MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED
ENTERPRISES
Information Technology
Industries
April
2003
Acknowledgements
|
4 |
Foreward
|
5 |
|
Executive
Summary |
6 |
|
Terms & Abbreviations |
14 |
|
CHAPTER 1: Overview of the China Telecommunications, Information
Technology, and E-commerce Markets |
18 |
|
CHAPTER 2: Telecommunications |
36 |
|
CHAPTER 3: Information Technology
(IT) |
54 |
|
CHAPTER 4: Electronic Commerce |
75 |
|
CHAPTER 5: Market Opportunities and Market Entry Strategies |
88 |
|
CHAPTER 6: The Role of the U.S. Department of Commerce |
100 |
|
APPENDICES |
|
|
A.
Information Technology Agreement Products by Harmonized System (HS)
Number |
112 |
|
B.
Regulations of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises
Regulations on Telecommunications of the PRC |
120 |
|
C. 2003
U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade Information Industry
Subgroup Work Plan |
141 |
|
D. Useful Contacts: United States and China |
144 |
|
E. Selected IT and Telecommunications Trade
Events in China |
154 |
|
F. List of Organizations Contributing
Information for this Report |
157 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The report was prepared by international trade specialists from Information Technology Industries offices in the Trade Development unit of the U.S. Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration (ITA): Jeffrey Rohlmeier and Tu-Trang Phan of the Office of Information Technologies and Electronic Commerce, and John Henry of the Office of Telecommunications Technologies. They were actively supported by U.S. Commercial Service staff in China, including Jianhong (Michael) Wang in Beijing, Scott Shaw, Christie Ho, and Ronnie Xu in Shanghai, Rose Nickel and Xu Tao in Chengdu, and Kent Gou in Guangzhou.
Information on the Office of Information Technologies and Electronic Commerce and the Office of Telecommunications Technologies can be found at: (http://www.export.gov/infotech).
FOREWORD
This report describes and analyzes the trends, key issues, and events in information technology, telecommunications, Internet and e-commerce adoption in China, to create a framework from which U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can make educated business decisions about entering these markets. The report analyzes the status of telecommunications liberalization, competition in telecommunications services and the deployment of new technologies, and how these changes are affecting the adoption of the Internet and e-commerce. It also analyzes the economic, cultural, and political factors influencing the adoption of information, Internet, and e-commerce technologies. The report highlights issues and market opportunities relevant to U.S. SMEs in the telecommunications, information technology (IT), and e-commerce areas. In addition, it provides suggested market entry strategies for SMEs, U.S. Department of Commerce and other resources to assist U.S. firms in market entry endeavors, and contacts in the United States and China.
The report is based on bilateral meetings conducted in China and the United States over the course of the past several years, as well as market research and analysis undertaken in China in June 2002 by international trade specialists from the Information Technology Industries unit of Trade Development within the Commerce Department's International Trade Administration (ITA): Tu-Trang Phan and Jeffrey Rohlmeier of the Office of Information Technologies and Electronic Commerce, and John Henry of the Office of Telecommunications Technologies. They interviewed software, Internet, and telecommunications equipment producers and services providers, trade associations, industry analysts, IT end-users, and government officials in China. The work was actively supported by market specialists in ITA's Commercial Service (US&FCS) in China. Information gathered from on-site interviews was supplemented with data from market research firms and an extensive review of available literature.
The information in this report was accurate to
the best of our knowledge at the time of drafting in March/April 2003. Certain changes to China's government
structure resulting from the March 2003 National People's Congress may not have
been known at the time this report was published and could not be incorporated
in this report. A supplement to this report
may be prepared at a later date to reflect new information.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
IT Industry
The IT industry remains a
pillar industry for the nation and should have a value-added output exceeding
$76 billion in 2003. The Chinese
government is very supportive of developing China’s information industry and
addressed this development for the first time in its Tenth Five Year Plan
(2001-2005). The plan includes
proposals to accelerate electronic commerce (e-commerce) development and
promote the use of information technology in sectors such as banking, finance,
taxation, and trade as well as in rural areas. The plan also calls for reform
of state-owned enterprises, promotion of science and technology research,
promotion of the development of the software and integrated circuit industries,
and the improvement of China’s information infrastructure. The Chinese government is establishing three
new high-tech “belts” located in the Zhujiang River Delta in South China, the
Yangtze River Delta region in Jiangsu province, and across Beijing to expand
electronics production. Since 1997, the
government has doubled its expenditure to $13 billion to promote science and
technology research and development, compared to the previous five-year period.
It believes the information industry will continue to grow at a rate three
times faster than that of the national economy. By 2005, the Chinese government expects that the industry will
account for over seven percent of GDP, of which telecommunications will
represent 4.7 percent and electronic products the remaining 2.5 percent.
Telecommunications Market
According to the Ministry
of Information Industry (MII), China will have an additional 33 million fixed
phone and 52 million mobile phone subscribers this year and record $198 billion
in sales of information products. It will also continue to invest more than $25
billion in fixed assets in the telecommunications sector. China’s telecommunications network growth
has exploded since 1990. With 214
million wireline subscribers and 207 million mobile subscribers as of year-end
2002, China now boasts the largest wireline and wireless networks in the
world. This tremendous growth can be
attributed to a number of factors. The
Chinese government has made telecom and IT development a national priority and
enacted preferential policy initiatives to promote telecommunications modernization. As China’s
economic development has progressed, it has generated increased demand for
additional communications services and equipment. The rise in living standards has also made it possible for a
growing number of Chinese citizens to afford telephones. Finally, technological
advances have contributed to network expansion by making available better
equipment at lower prices.
The Chinese telecom services market has been gradually restructured over the past decade. The former Ministry of Post and Telecommunications’ (MPT) monopoly status through China Telecom ended in 1994 when the China State Council approved the creation of China United Telecommunications, or China Unicom. It also established China Jitong Corporation in that year as a data communications supplier and charged it with developing a national “information highway” network, which was known as the Golden Bridge Network. Further industry restructuring occurred in 1999 when the Ministry of Information Industry (MII), which had been created by a merger of the MPT and the Ministry of Electronics Industry (MEI) the year before, spun off China Telecom’s wireless network into a new entity, China Mobile, and its satellite operations into China Satellite. MII also launched China Netcom later that year as China’s third telecom service provider and gave the Ministry of Railways a license in 2000 to provide all basic telecommunications services, except mobile services, through the newly-established China Railway Telecom. The State Council split China Telecom again in May 2002, allowing the company to retain its local loop networks in twenty-one of China’s southern provinces and municipalities, and combining China Netcom and China Jitong into a much larger China Netcom which would handle the local loop networks in ten northern provinces and municipal areas. The revenues of China’s telecom services providers were more than $55 billion at year-end 2002 after the restructuring concluded. China Mobile, the dominant player in mobile services with about two-thirds of the subscriber base, held over 37 percent of this total while China Telecom, the leading wireline provider, had a 33 percent share.
China has one of the most competitive telecommunications equipment markets which, along with the explosive growth of the country’s telecommunications networks, has drawn all of the major international equipment suppliers to establish joint venture manufacturing operations there since the 1980s. At the same time, the Chinese government has fostered the development of Chinese manufacturers through a wide range of tariff and non-tariff barriers (requirements that foreign suppliers establish joint ventures with Chinese partners, build manufacturing plants in China, transfer technology, and offset their imports of component parts with exports of finished products from the factory). Chinese manufacturers now compete more vigorously with foreign companies not only in the Chinese market, but also in third-country markets.
U.S. telecommunications equipment
exports to China have risen at an average annual rate of 8 percent each year
since 1993, reaching a peak of $1.1 billion in 2001. However, U.S. imports of these products from China grew more than
twice as fast (19 percent) each year during this same period to $ 3.2
billion. By year-end 2002, U.S. telecommunications
equipment exports fell sharply, losing over a third of their value, while
imports from China increased by nearly $1.4 billion. These significant changes in trade have led to a steadily
worsening U.S. telecommunications product trade deficit with this country.
There is currently intense interest and speculation surrounding China’s plans for third generation (3G) wireless technologies with three standards under evaluation by MII. The Chinese view WCDMA as a “European” standard, CDMA-2000 as an “American” one, and TD-SCDMA as “Chinese.” MII has indicated that it will issue four 3G licenses to Chinese wireless services providers and will allow each operator to choose its preferred standard. However, most observers believe that pressure will be exerted on at least one operator to go with the Chinese TD-SCDMA standard. The stakes will be very high, not only for operators, but for equipment vendors.
IT Market
China is one of the world’s fastest growing IT markets and has surpassed Australia to become the Asia-Pacific region’s second largest IT market after Japan. According to International Data Corporation (IDC), China’s market for IT products and services reached $22 billion in 2002 and is expected to exceed $40.2 billion by 2006, representing nearly a 16.3 percent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during these years. In 2002, hardware accounted for 73 percent of this overall market, followed by packaged software (10 percent) and IT services (17 percent). The Chinese government’s emphasis on expanding the use of information technologies in schools, public sector agencies, and businesses has led to increased spending on computer equipment and should continue to affect demand in the future. Personal computers (PCs) have been a major focus of China’s IT hardware spending activity. In 2001, China ranked fourth in the world for its installed base of PCs, ranked third in the world for its installed base in the government and education market segments, and sixth in the home segment. Due to industrial policies that have stimulated the development of China’s computer hardware industry, domestic manufacturers have captured more than 70 percent of Chinese PC sales while U.S. suppliers have held much of the remainder. China’s PC server, handheld computer device, and storage market segments are also expected to have high growth rates through 2006.
The volume in IT hardware trade between the United States and China has nearly tripled between 1998 and 2002. As in telecommunications equipment, U.S. computer exports to China have grown much more slowly than imports from that country---a CAGR of only 2 percent versus 34 percent---leading to a significant U.S. trade deficit with China in this product area. In 2002, the United States exported $579 million of IT hardware to China, making it the ninth largest customer for these exports. However, in that same year, China became the largest foreign supplier of computer equipment to the United States with its shipments totaling over $9 billion. China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 2001 will contribute to boosting this trade between the two countries by allowing U.S. and Chinese IT firms to take advantage of tariff reductions on certain IT hardware and to be subject to the same legal and regulatory requirements and benefits as domestic suppliers.
China has emerged as the second largest IT hardware producer in the world behind the United States and is followed by Japan and Taiwan, in that order. China’s IT hardware output doubled between 1999 and 2002 due to China’s lower production and labor costs, investment incentives, and relatively reliable infrastructure. U.S., Japanese, and especially Taiwanese suppliers have established a manufacturing presence in China to gain market access, but domestic firms, such as the Legend and Founder Groups, now present a significant competitive challenge to the foreign subsidiaries as a result of aggressive pricing tactics and their close-knit relationships with government buyers.
Although much smaller than the IT hardware sector, China’s software market has been growing much more rapidly and should increase to more than $5 billion by 2006, according to IDC. The main drivers behind this growth will be China’s successful bid for the 2008 Olympic Games and its membership in the WTO. Most of the software purchases in China have been in the low-end applications (e.g., accounting and financial management software) market segment which domestic suppliers dominate. However, as more Chinese consumers become exposed to international technology trends, China’s demand will become more sophisticated and move toward high-end applications (e.g., enterprise resources planning, customer relationship management, and supply chain management software) that foreign firms currently control. Other segments that have piqued the interest of Chinese end-users include IT security solutions, the Linux operating system, and applications developed for the Linux open source platform.
The Chinese government has recognized that China’s software industry lags significantly behind world market leaders and shifted its industrial policies to favor the development of domestic software capabilities. It has issued a number of policies ranging from export incentives to value-added tax rebates and financial assistance to small businesses and established eleven software development bases in relatively large cities, near universities and scientific institutions. China will attempt to increase its software industry’s sales from approximately $4 billion in 2001 to $31 billion by 2005 and more than double its share of the world software market to 3 percent during the same period. To meet this goal, China’s software industry will have to control over 60 percent of the domestic market, export $3 billion worth of products and services annually, and train 20,000 to 30,000 software professionals each year. The government has also promulgated laws addressing intellectual property protection since China has the second highest software piracy rate in the Asia-Pacific region and must attack this problem if it is to achieve its objective of creating a world-class software industry. Additional obstacles it must overcome are the relative poor quality of Chinese software developers and the lack of an entrepreneurial culture in China that fosters innovation.
China’s market for IT services is expected to reach $4.7 billion in 2003, representing an increase of nearly 25 percent over the previous year. In the next four years, China’s IT services market is expected to reach $11.7 billion, growing at CAGR of nearly 26 percent between 2003 and 2007. Implementation services represent the largest proportion of IT services market in China, followed by operations management services. While IT services represents a relatively small portion of the total IT market compared to hardware, this segment is expected to grow substantially as the notion of procuring IT services becomes more widely accepted in China.
Growth of the Internet
Use of the Internet in China has been expanding rapidly. The number of Internet users grew from only 15,000 in 1995 to 59 million (or 5 percent of China’s population) by January 2003. Most of these users currently access the Internet through a dial-up connection. However, Strategy Analytics, a market research firm, predicts that nearly 37 million homes will have a broadband connection by 2008. The increasing availability of broadband and cheaper charges for Internet access will be the key drivers to the development of China’s Internet in the future. One major barrier to the growth of Internet use could be the Chinese government’s continuing regulation of content.
Electronic Commerce
With its extremely large population, China may have the greatest potential of all Asia-Pacific countries to experience exponential growth in electronic commerce (e-commerce). China has not only had a dramatic increase in Internet use, but also in the number of electronic businesses (e-businesses) established. In fact, an estimated 78 percent of all Chinese websites are now operated by “enterprises” and 5 percent by “businesses.”[1] However, despite these developments, only 31 percent of Internet users in China are now purchasing goods and services online. Moreover, only 11 percent of Chinese “enterprise” websites and 45 percent of Chinese “business” websites offer “e-commerce services.” Among the reasons why Chinese businesses and consumers are not yet buying online are: the use of credit payment systems is not widespread; online merchants are not yet fully trusted; the security of electronic payments cannot be guaranteed; and delivery systems are inefficient throughout most of the country. China has also yet to develop a legal, regulatory, or policy framework conducive to the rapid growth of e-commerce. Laws recognizing the validity of “e-contracting” tools and stressing the importance of online security have been proposed, but not fully implemented.
Nevertheless, despite these challenges, the prospects for the expansion of e-commerce in China are good. While e-business in other countries has suffered due to the recent global economic downturn, some observers have estimated that China’s e-commerce sector (business-to-business and business-to-consumer) may grow from around $16 billion in 2002 to $99 billion in 2006. The Chinese government has taken action to encourage more businesses and consumers to go online by stepping up its national “informatization” campaign and to continue its efforts to construct an appropriate framework for e-commerce to flourish. Its efforts to expand online education services (e-learning) and to institute electronic government (e-government) have been largely successful as well.
WTO Accession
Through its accession to the WTO, China has committed to wide-ranging reforms affecting trade in IT and telecommunications equipment that should result in better access for foreign suppliers to the Chinese market. These reforms include agreeing to sign the Information Technology Agreement (ITA), thereby eliminating tariffs on all products covered by it (see Appendices); to allow imports and distribution of most products, particularly those covered by the ITA, into any part of China; and to remove quotas and local content, technology transfer, and export performance requirements. China also agreed to allow an increased level of foreign investment and/or open a larger geographic area to foreign participation through a staged implementation plan for its IT, Internet, and telecommunications services markets. For example, in the telecommunications services area, it will allow 50 percent foreign participation in value-added services two years after accession, 49 percent in mobile voice and data services five years after accession, and 49 percent in domestic basic services six years after accession. The Chinese government has further committed to undertake the pro-competitive obligations contained in the Reference Paper of the WTO Agreement on Basic Telecommunications Services, such as establishing an independent regulator, defining interconnection rights, and prohibiting anti-competitive practices. China’s accession to the WTO should stimulate greater foreign competition and investment in China’s e-commerce market as well which will spur the development and introduction of more efficient mechanisms for online payment, delivery, and security.
U.S. information and communications technology (ICT) exporters may find substantial market opportunities in China, but they also will face tremendous challenges. While their products are generally well regarded in this country, U.S. firms must compete with offerings from European, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, and Canadian companies as well as those of local Chinese manufacturers. As previously noted, local firms benefit from a variety of Chinese government policies that are designed to foster the development of an indigenous ICT industry. China’s accession to the WTO has helped to reduce or eliminate many of the market access barriers by U.S. exporters, but significant hurdles still remain.
In the telecommunications area, the build-out of 3G wireless networks will offer opportunities not only for U.S. telecommunications equipment vendors, but also for companies supplying a wide range of associated software applications, including roaming, billing, and user applications packages. China’s accession to the WTO has opened new opportunities for U.S. telecommunications service providers to invest in a Chinese market that had previously been closed to foreign participation. However, U.S. telecommunications firms should note that this market opening has been staged and that they should target value-added services first since this sector will open the fastest and will have the highest investment limit.
Four key factors are opening significant opportunities for U.S. IT hardware and software suppliers to take advantage of China’s vast consumer market. These are: 1) the government’s informatization drive, as stated in its Tenth Five-Year Plan, to spread the use of information technologies among communities, government agencies, and China’s traditional industries; 2) the “Go West” campaign to narrow the digital divide between Eastern and Western China; 3) China’s accession to the WTO; and 4) the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games and its particular focus on high-tech applications.
According to IDC, China’s increase in e-government spending of nearly 40 percent annually between 2001 and 2003 provides U.S. IT firms with the opportunity to introduce solutions that will help the national, provincial, and municipal governments offer online services to their citizens. These solutions include networking hardware and software, Chinese language database software, Chinese language content management tools, portal software, and network security solutions. Thanks to the market opening resulting from China’s membership in the WTO, U.S. IT suppliers will have new business prospects in traditional industries, such as manufacturing and banking, that need to upgrade their systems to become competitive internationally. These industries will require solutions (e.g., enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, and supply chain management packages) that will help them become more efficient in delivering products to customers and receiving inputs from their suppliers. U.S. IT companies should take advantage of China’s rapidly growing market for IT services by not only targeting the traditional industries, but also by assisting state-owned enterprises to increase their competitiveness through selecting the right combination of equipment and software.
U.S. IT suppliers should benefit from the $24 million investment that China’s Ministry of Science and Technology is making to bridge the country’s digital divide through the wide variety of programs that are a part of the “Go West” Initiative. IT solutions companies will be needed to educate communities, local governments, and businesses in Western China in various uses of information technologies and to train citizens on how to use computers and the Internet. Because of the large rural economy in this region, U.S. software firms will find substantial demand for Chinese-language software targeted at the agricultural sector and packages that would help farmers distribute their products more efficiently throughout China. In addition, U.S. Internet content providers will have an opportunity to develop Chinese-language content to increase the use of the Internet, especially for educational purposes in schools and hospitals, in Western China.
China’s successful bid for the 2008 Beijing Olympics will present U.S. IT companies with enormous opportunities to sell their equipment, software, and services. The IT projects envisioned by the municipal government of Beijing will require a wide range of products such as smart card technologies, broadband applications, database applications, e-commerce platforms, network security solutions, simulation software, games software relating to Olympic sports, and voice recognition software.
Finally, in the area of e-commerce, China’s business-to-business market should continue to offer U.S. IT firms the best prospects for exports. Demand for U.S. web developers, web hosting services providers, and e-commerce consultants is particularly high. E-commerce products and services localized for the Chinese users should enjoy the most success.
U.S. suppliers interested in pursuing opportunities in China’s ICT markets should recognize the differences in business and cultural styles between the United States and China and develop an appropriate market entry strategy. Some form of local presence is essential. Options include using agents and distributors; partnering with large IT firms, systems integrators, or consultants; partnering with like-minded Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with complimentary skills or products; or setting up a local office staffed by local employees to do marketing and training and to provide ongoing support. Even though China is a very large market of 1.3 billion people, it is essential that businesses understand consumer behavior in the provinces/regions they are targeting. For example, spending patterns and needs of ICT end-users in the Pearl River Delta Region are very different from those of end-users in the Yangtze River Delta Region and from those in Western China. Regardless of the market entry strategy, a variety of organizations, both public and private, can help U.S. ICT SMEs enter or expand their presence in China.
TERMS
AND ABBREVIATIONS
$ Unless otherwise noted, dollar figures cited in this report are U.S. dollars
2G second generation (mobile communications)
2.5G intermediate generation of mobile communications between 2G and 3G
3G third generation (mobile communications)
ADSL asymmetrical digital subscriber line
AMPS advanced mobile phone service
APEC Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
AQSIQ State General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine
ARPL average revenue per line
ARPS average revenue per subscriber
ARPU average revenue per unit
ASP application service provider
ATM asynchronous transfer mode
B2B business-to-business e-commerce
B2C business-to-consumer e-commerce
BDIC Business Development and Industrial Cooperation (Working Group of JCCT)
CAGR compound annual growth rate
CCC China Compulsory Certification
CDMA code division multiple access
CERNET China Education and Research Network
CERT computer emergency response team
CNCA Certification and Accreditation Administration of China
CNNIC China Internet Network Information Center
CORBA Common Object Request Broker Architecture
CRM customer relationship management
CSTNET China Science and Technology Network
DSL digital subscriber loop
ECBA E-commerce Business Alliance
ECSG E-commerce Steering Group
ECOTECH Economic and Technical (Cooperation in the Field of E-commerce)
EDGE enhanced data for GSM evolution
EDI electronic data interchange
EMS enhanced messaging service
ERP enterprise resource planning
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FDI foreign direct investment
FITE foreign invested telecommunications enterprises
G2B government-to-business e-commerce
GDP gross domestic product
GPA Government Procurement Agreement
GPRS general packet radio service
GPS global positioning system
GSM global system for mobile communications
HDTV high definition television
HDSL high bit rate digital subscriber line
IC integrated circuit
ICP Internet content provider
ICT information and communications technologies
IDC International Data Corporation
II information industry
IP Internet protocol
IPO initial public offering
IPR intellectual property rights
IP/VPN Internet protocol-based virtual private network
ISA industry sector analysis
ISDN integrated services digital network
ISO International Organization for Standardization
ISP Internet service provider
IT information technology
ITA Information Technology Agreement
ITA International Trade Administration
ITU International Telecommunications Union
JCCT Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade
kpbs kilobits per second
LAN local-area network
MEI Ministry of Electronic Industry
MMS multimedia message service
MVNO mobile virtual network operator
NPC National People’s Congress
NTDB National Trade Data Bank
OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
OMG Object Management Group
PC personal computer
PDA personal digital assistant
PRC People’s Republic of China
R&D research and development
RMB RenMinBi (Chinese currency unit, 1 RMB = 1 Yuan; approximately 8.2 RMB or
Yuan = U.S. $1)
SAC Standardization Administration of China
SARFT State Administration for Radio, Film, and Television
SCITO State Council Informatization Office
SCM supply chain management
SDPC State Development Planning Commission
SETC State Economic and Trade Commission
SI systems integrator
SIM subscriber identification module (as in smart cards)
SIPO State Intellectual Property Office
SME small and medium-sized enterprise
SMR special mobile radio
SMS short message service
SOE state-owned enterprise
SPPA State Press and Publication Administration
TBT Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement
TEL Telecommunications and Information (Working Group under APEC)
TDMA time division multiple access
TD-SCDMA time division synchronous code division multiple access
TRIMS trade-related investment measures
TRIPS trade-related intellectual property rights
UMTS universal mobile telecommunications system
USEAC U.S. Export Assistance Center
USITO U.S. Information Technology Office
USTR Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
VAS value-added services
VAT value-added tax
VC venture capitalist
VOIP voice over Internet protocol
VSAT very small aperture terminal
WAN wide-area network
WAP wireless application protocol
WLAN wireless local area network
WLL wireless local loop
WTO World Trade Organization
Yuan Chinese currency unit; see also “RMB”
Y2K Year 2000
Chapter 1: Overview
With 1.3 billion inhabitants, China is the most populous country in the world. Roughly one out of five people live in China. The country’s expanding economy has brought economic stability to a region that was plagued with a financial crisis in 1997 and the stagnation of the Japanese economy.
According to China’s State Statistical Bureau, China’s economy grew 8 percent in 2002, compared to 7.3 percent in 2001. China’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is estimated to be $1.3 trillion in 2002 and GDP per capita to be $1000, which is the highest it has ever been in China’s economic history. Increased foreign investment and exports are among the drivers for the nation’s continued economic growth. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the information technology (IT) sector has been instrumental in China’s economic expansion. For example, Motorola (United States) is China’s largest single company foreign investor with investment totaling $3.4 billion. Its facilities include a $1.9 billion semiconductor plant in Tianjin and a telecommunications manufacturing plant in Hangzhou. The company plans to invest a total of $10 billion in China by 2006.
The State Development Planning Commission speculates that if China can maintain economic growth at 7 percent, GDP per capita will rise to $1200, improving the quality of life significantly for the nation’s citizens. There is no question China’s economy is expanding, but many economists are skeptical about the real rate of growth being as high as reported. In 2002, thirty-one provincial authorities and municipalities reported growth figures that exceeded the national average (Figure 1-1).

![]()

![]()

China’s leaders still face challenges as the country continues to transition
from a centrally planned to a market-based economy. The unemployment rate is becoming a problem, rising from 3.1
percent in 2000 to 4 percent in 2002.
The privatization and reform of state-owned enterprises as well as
China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 2001 will
attract more foreign investment and create more employment for the population
as a whole.
The IT industry continues to be a pillar industry for the nation. China’s IT industry’s value-added output is expected to exceed $76 billion in 2003. According to the Ministry of Information Industry, China will have an additional 33 million fixed phone and 52 million mobile phone subscribers this year, and sales of electronic information products will reach $198 billion. China will continue to invest in excess of $25 billion in fixed assets in the telecommunications sector.
The National Party Congress is the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) legislature and leading authority. The Congress is convened by the Central Committee and is held once every five years. Since its inception in 1921, the CPC has met sixteen times. The most recent meeting took place in November 2002. The Standing Committee convenes the National People’s Congress (NPC) during the first quarter of each year. The NPC has the authority to enact and amend the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, to select and remove leadership positions within the Chinese government, to formulate policy, and to supervise the implementation of the Constitution. The most recent meeting of the NPC occurred in March 2003.
During the National Party Congress, the Communist Party appointed Vice President Hu Jintao to replace Jiang Zemin as General Secretary and he was confirmed as the new President during the National People’s Congress (Table 1-1). This is the first change in General Secretary leadership in thirteen years. In addition to confirming Vice President Hu’s appointment as President, the Congress also announced Vice Premier Wen Jiabao as Premier Zhu Rongji’s successor, and Vice Premier Wu Bangguo to replace Li Peng as NPC Chairman.
For the IT and telecom sectors, Wang Xudong, former Communist Party Chief of Hebei Province, was appointed Party Secretary of the Ministry of Information Industry (MII) in November 2002 and was named to replace Minister Wu Jichuan as the Minister of Information Industry in March 2003. The development of the IT and telecommunications industries will continue to be a priority for China’s leaders.
|
Table 1-1:
China’s Politburo Standing Committee |
||
Position |
Old
Leadership |
New
Leadership |
|
President
and General Secretary |
Jiang Zemin |
Hu Jintao |
|
Premier |
Zhu Rongji |
Wen
Jiabao |
|
Communist
Party Affairs Chief |
|
Zeng
Qinghong |
|
NPC
chairman |
Li
Peng |
Wu
Bangguo |
|
First
Vice-Premier in charge of the economy |
|
Huang
Ju |
|
Secretary
of the Political and Legal Affairs Commission |
|
Luo
Gan |
|
Chairman
of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference |
Li Ruihuan |
Jia Qinglin |
|
Central
Commission for Disciplinary Inspection |
Wei
Jianxing |
Wu
Guanzheng |
|
Politburo
Standing Committee Member |
Li Lanqing |
Li Changchun |
There are at least ten Chinese government bodies influencing the development of the IT sector in China (Figure 1-2). Many of these agencies have broader responsibilities beyond the ICT and Internet sectors, but the brief descriptions below are limited to their relationship to the ICT industry.
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) – MII is responsible for regulating ICT products and services. The ministry was created in 1998 as a result of a merger between the former Ministry of Electronics Industry (MEI) and the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications (MPT). MII develops policies to promote the development of the information technology and telecommunications industries, tests and administers approval marks for products that affect the nation’s telecommunications networks, issues licenses for basic and value-added telecommunications services, and regulates IT products. The provincial telecommunications authorities and municipal government’s IT offices also report to MII, as well as their respective local government authorities.
Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) – The Ministry of Science and Technology is responsible for developing national policies for science and technology development, supporting the commercialization of new technologies, promoting technology innovation, and administering China’s high-tech programs, such as the Torch and Spark Programs. Like MII, MoST also has science and technology offices throughout the provincial and municipal regions that report to both the local government and to MoST in Beijing.
State Council Informatization Office (SCITO) - The State Council Informatization Office (SCITO) was set up in August 2001 as an inter-agency coordinating body to oversee China's regulatory and commercial developments in the information technology and telecommunications sectors and implement the central government's policies and measures that drive informatization. In this capacity, SCITO directs and supervises all relevant ministries that affect these developments. This office is the executive body for the State Informatization Steering Group headed by Premier Zhu Rongji. The Steering Group focuses on policy planning, applications promotion and network security. Its chair is Zhu Rongji and five vice-chairs are Hu Jintao, Li Lanqing, Wu Bangguo, Ding Guan'gen, and Zeng Peiyan. SCITO also has municipal level informatization and IT offices throughout China that focus on implementing informatization programs.
Ministry of Public Security (MPS) – The Ministry of Public Security is responsible for security of computer and communications networks. The Ministry also regulates the development and sale of network security products and encryption technologies in China. The local bureaus of MPS, referred to as Public Security Bureaus, control the distribution of “harmful” content by monitoring Internet Service Providers as well as Internet cafes.
State Development Planning Commission (SDPC)[2] – SDPC was created in 1998 as an outgrowth of the State Planning Commission. SDPC develops policies to stimulate China’s economic and social development, formulates pricing policies, and approves all major IT projects. SDPC officials also drafted China’s Tenth Five-Year Plan, which serves as the blueprint for China’s economic and social development from 2001to 2005. See following section on Tenth Five-Year Plan for more details on China’s IT-specific goals.
State Economic Trade Commission (SETC)[3]
– SETC is responsible for assisting in the
restructuring and reform of state-owned enterprises and approving the
establishment of trade associations in China.
In addition, SETC has an office focused on providing assistance to small-
to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and promoting informatization among SMEs in
rural and urban regions of China.
Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation (MOFTEC)’s2 E-commerce Administration Department – MOFTEC’s E-commerce office is responsible for coordinating e-commerce regulations and policies throughout the Chinese government. For example, MOFTEC is responsible for drafting China’s e-signature legislation. MOFTEC’s E-commerce office represents China in the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation’s (APEC) E-Commerce Steering Group (ECSG) and China’s interests on e-commerce issues within multinational fora. MOFTEC’s WTO office is also the inquiry point for China’s WTO compliance efforts.
FIGURE 1-2: PARTIAL ORGANIZATION CHART ON PRC GOVERNMENT AGENCIES INVOLVED IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES
APEC ECSG: APEC E-commerce Steering Group JCCT: U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade CLWG: Commercial Law Working Group BDIC: Business Development Industrial Cooperation Working Group II Subgroup: Information Industry Subgroup (co-chaired by DOC and MII) APEC TEL: APEC Telecommunications Working Group * Listing is not
comprehensive
![]()
GLOSSARY OF
TERMS

![]()

![]()
State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) – SIPO is responsible for drafting and publishing policies relating to patents and intellectual property rights (IPR) and is also the primary agency for international cooperation on IPR-related matters.
National Copyright Administration (NCA) – NCA is responsible for copyright administration and enforcement. NCA is also responsible for nationwide copyright issues, including investigating infringement cases, administering foreign-related copyright issues, developing foreign-related arbitration rules and supervising administrative authorities.
State Press and Publication Administration (SPPA) – SPPA investigates copyright infringements and censors content in publications, including Internet publishing. In January 2000, the SPPA began drafting rules on Internet news content that required private news websites to obtain permission before publishing news stories not already published by official news organizations. In addition, portals were forbidden from providing links to outside news sources such as those in Hong Kong and Taiwan. In August 2002, MII and SPPA jointly issued the Provisional Measures on the Management of Internet Publications. Internet publishers are now required to receive approval from SPPA before publishing their content online. SPPA is also responsible for monitoring their online contents according to the relevant laws and regulations in China.
State Administration for Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT) – SARFT is responsible for controlling content on radio, film, and television as well as access to satellite and cable networks. SARFT also oversees the operation of China Central Television (CCTV), China’s national TV network.
State General Administration of Quality Supervision,
Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) – AQSIQ
administers China’s entry-exit commodities inspection and implements
certification, accreditation, and standardization regulations. The
Standardization Administration of China (SAC), administratively under AQSIQ,
develops national standardization policies and represents China at the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and other international standardization
organizations. The Certification and Accreditation Administration of China
(CNCA), also administratively under AQSIQ, enforces policies governing the
import and export of IT-related products and issues the China Compulsory
Certification (CCC) mark for 21 IT and telecom products.[4] AQSIQ officials represent China at meetings
on the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT).
The relationship between China’s IT-related trade associations and MII is unclear. Many of the former and current senior level Ministry officials also represent industry trade associations in leadership positions (Table 1-2). The trade associations do consist of private sector companies, and the extent to which the industry representatives influence IT policymakers and vice-versa is not clearly defined. Recently, Chinese government officials have shown interest in learning more about the role of trade associations and how associations are structured in other countries, including the United States.
TABLE 1-2: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IT TRADE ASSOCIATIONS AND GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES |
|||
|
Trade
Association |
Name |
Role
in Trade Association |
Role
in Chinese Government |
|
China
Information Industry Trade Association (CIITA) |
Zhang
Qi |
Chairwoman |
MII
Director General for Information Products |
|
China
Electronic Commerce Association (CECA) |
Song
Ling |
Chairwoman |
Former
MII Director General for Informatization |
|
China
Software Industry Association (CSIA) |
Chen
Chong |
President |
MII
Deputy Director General for Software Products |
|
China
Semiconductor Industry Association (CSIA) |
Yu
Zhongyu |
President |
Chief
Engineer at MII |
The year 2002 was a monumental one for China’s IT and telecommunications industry and market. China has become the world’s second largest IT hardware producer, the third largest electronic component and equipment producer, and is the second largest personal computer (PC) market. China has surpassed the United States in having the largest number of wireline and wireless subscribers, making it the fastest growing market for telecommunications services in the world.
The Chinese government is very supportive of developing China's information industry. The government's Tenth Five-Year Plan (2001-2005) will address the development of the country's information industry for the first time. During the Fifth Plenary Session of the 15th Central Committee of the Communist Party meeting in 2000, the Party acknowledged the importance of informatization to China’s economic and social development by approving the plan. The plan includes proposals to accelerate electronic commerce development and promote the use of information technology in sectors such as banking, finance, taxation, and trade, and to bring these technologies to rural areas. The plan also calls for reform of state-owned enterprises, promotion of science and technology research, promotion of the development of the software and integrated circuit industries, and the improvement of China’s information infrastructure.
The Chinese government believes that the information industry will continue to grow at a rate three times faster than that of the national economy. By 2005, the government expects the industry to account for 7 percent of GDP, of which the telecommunications industry will represent 4.7 percent, while the electronic products industry will account for 2.5 percent. Table 1-3 summarizes China’s goals for its domestic information industry by 2005. A more detailed discussion of what steps the Chinese government has taken to accomplish these goals can be found in the telecommunications chapter (Chapter 2) and the information technology chapter (Chapter 3).
|
Communications
Capacity |
|
|
Optical
cable |
2.5
million km in length |
|
Fixed
telephones |
300
million subscribers |
|
Wireless
network |
360
million subscribers |
|
PCs
online |
40
million |
|
Internet
subscribers |
200
million |
|
Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) and Internet Content Providers (ICPs) |
5000 |
|
Production
Volume |
|
|
Integrated
Circuits |
20
billion pieces |
|
Electronic
components |
500
billion pieces (of which 80 percent are chips) |
|
Cellular
phones |
100
million sets |
|
Optical
fiber |
20
million km |
|
Sales
of network equipment |
37
billion RMB (approximately $4.5 billion) |
|
Sales
of software |
250
billion RMB (approximately $30.5 billion) |
|
Service
Penetration |
|
|
Telephone
subscription |
40
percent penetration rate in China Telephone
connection to 95 percent of administrative villages |
|
Fixed
telephone subscription |
20
percent of world subscribers |
|
Mobile
subscription |
25
percent of world subscribers |
|
Radio
broadcasting and cable TV subscribers |
150
million |
Most of China’s population resides along the eastern coastal region (Figure 1-3). According to the University of Washington, over 90 percent of China’s population resides on 40 percent of the land. Half of China’s 1.3 billion people are under age 24. More than 98 million of those are under age 5. China has 166 cities with more than a million people. China also has 450 cities with a population of at least 250,000—compared to 68 cities in the United States with at least a quarter of a million people.
Figure 1-3: China's
Population Density in 2001


Source:
University of Washington
China’s Western region includes twelve provincial administrative regions that account for two-thirds of the land and one-third of the population. While China’s economic growth over the past twenty years has been impressive, most of its wealth has been along the Eastern coastal regions of China where the majority of China’s population resides. During the period of 1983 to 2001, the Eastern and Southern coastal regions mainly benefited from the $400 billion of new investment in China. The Eastern region attracted 88 percent of FDI, while the Central and Western regions attracted the remaining nine and three percent, respectively of total FDI[6]. As a result, there is a large income disparity between the two regions. Ninety percent of China’s poorest people live in the West. The income gap has widened over the years as well. For example, in Gansu Province, per capita income declined from 84 percent of the national average in 1980 to 56 percent in 1999.
The Chinese government has recognized this disparity and launched a “Go West” campaign in 2000 to help narrow the economic gap between Eastern and Western China. The State Council issued regulations on December 27, 2000, that officially granted preferential policies to Western China for investment, banking, credit, taxation, land and natural resources. Foreign investment in the region is also strongly encouraged, with more favorable policies in the West than in other parts of China. The policies are to be effective for ten years in the provinces of Gansu, Guizhou, Qinghai, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Yunan, the municipality of Chongqing, and the autonomous regions of Ningxia, Xinjiang and Tibet. Since 1999, the government has invested more that $48 billion on infrastructure, environmental protection, and technology-related projects in the West. The government is also revising its income tax policy to increase revenue to the region.
The Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) will invest another $24.2 million into programs aimed at narrowing the digital divide between Western and Eastern China. These programs will include public information forums, network education, increasing information technologies in the agricultural sector, and digitization of manufacturing.
After several years of planning and supporting the modernization of its economy and science and technology base, China targeted the development of its own national information infrastructure when it launched its five major Golden Projects at the beginning of the Ninth Five-Year Plan (1996 to 2000). The projects were designed to stimulate the nation’s information economy. The initial projects were Golden Bridge, Golden Card, Golden Customs, Golden Tax, and Golden Macro. Other minor projects were proposed covering areas ranging from building materials to public health (Table 1-4). These efforts are largely under the control of the Ministry of Information Industry and the National Promoting Office of Electronic Information Systems. They have set up Jitong Communications Company, a consortium of 25 Chinese companies, to handle the overall design, planning, and implementation of the projects.
|
Table 1-4:
Summary of China’s Golden Projects |
||
|
Name |
Official
Name |
Responsible
Ministries and Organizations |
|
Golden
Bridge |
National
Public Economic Information Communication Network |
Ministry
of Electronics Industry [7],
State Information Center, Jitong Company |
|
Golden
Card |
Electronic
Money Project |
People’s
Bank of China, Ministry of Electronics Industry6, Ministry of
Internal Trade[8],
Great Wall Computer Company |
|
Golden
Customs |
National
Foreign Economic Trade Information Network Project |
Ministry
of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade[9],
Customs Department, Jitong Company |
|
Golden
Macro |
National
Economic Macro-Policy Technology System |
China
Export-Import Bank, Ministry of Finance, State Information Center |
|
Golden
Tax |
Computerized
Tax Return and Invoice System Project |
Ministry
of Finance, Ministry of Electronics Industry6, National Taxation
Bureau, Great Wall Computer Company |
|
Golden
Sea |
|
State
Statistical Bureau, People’s Bank of China, State Information Center |
|
Golden
Intelligence |
China
Education and Research Network (CERNET) |
State
Education Commission |
|
Golden
Enterprise |
Industrial
Production and Information Distribution System |
State
Economic and Trade Commission |
|
Golden
Agriculture |
Overall
Agricultural Administration and Information Service System |
Ministry
of Agriculture |
|
Golden
Health |
National
Health Information Network |
Ministry
of Health |
|
Golden
Information |
State
Statistical Information Project |
State
Statistical Bureau |
|
Golden
Cellular |
Mobile
Communications Production and Marketing Project |
Ministry
of Electronics Industry6 |
|
Golden
Switch |
Digital
Switch 2000 Switch Systems Production Project |
Ministry
of Electronics Industry6, Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications6 |
Source: Ministry of Information Industry |
||
According to the MII, China is developing three electronic and information “belts” located in the Zhujiang River Delta in south China, the Yangtze River Delta region in Jiangsu Province, and across Beijing, Tianjin and Tanggu in north China. Guangdong Province in Southern China produced nearly $47 billion worth of electronics and IT products in 2002, making it the highest producing region in China. Jiangsu Province’s output value increased 21 percent from 2001, reaching $31 billion. The integrated circuit, computer, and digital audio and video devices industries have become a pillar sector for the region. Beijing’s output of electronics and IT products reached $722 million in 2002, representing a 6 percent increase from the previous year.
Since 1997, MoST has doubled its expenditure to 104 billion RMB (approximately $13 billion) to promote science and technology research and development (R&D), compared to the previous five-year period. Corporate R&D accounted for 65 percent of total spending. Among new technology innovations are the development of China’s mobile standard, time division synchronous code division multiple access (TD-SCDMA). In the next five years, the Ministry plans to significantly increase its spending to nearly $85 billion.
MoST is responsible for developing and administering many of the national initiatives to improve national economic development through science and technology. Below are brief overviews of some of the programs:
The 863 Program was initiated in 1986 to develop large scale technologies targeted for both military and civilian use in the biology, space, information, laser, automation, and energy technologies sectors.
The Spark Program was also formally implemented in 1986 to help the rural economy adopt appropriate technologies to improve the agrarian economy, promote rural productivity, and relieve poverty.
The Torch Program began in 1988 and was designed to promote R&D of new and advanced technologies, to foster an entrepreneurial spirit among researchers and engineers, and to assist researchers in commercializing new technologies. The Torch Program focuses on the following key fields: new materials, biological engineering, electronics and information, and energy saving and environmental protection technologies. As part of the Program, MoST has created several New Technology Development Zones throughout China to encourage the development of these new technologies.
After 15 years of negotiations, China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) on December 11, 2001. China’s membership in the WTO will reduce uncertainties in the Chinese market as China upholds its commitments at the international level. At the same time, its membership will strengthen Chinese companies to become more competitive in the world economy in the long term. China's WTO commitments will yield the following benefits for the U.S. IT and telecom sectors:
For enterprises and individuals that are not invested in China, the right to import and export will be granted in a non-discriminatory and transparent manner. Any requirements will be for customs and fiscal purposes only.
Furthermore, prior to its accession, China did not generally permit foreign companies to distribute products through wholesale and retail systems in China or to provide related distribution services, such as repair and maintenance services. These prohibitions will be phased out over three years for most products, including those covered by the ITA.
4) Elimination of investment restrictions and technology transfer and local content requirements - China will no longer condition importation or investment approvals on whether competing domestic suppliers exist or on performance requirements of any kind, such as export performance, local content, technology transfer, offsets, foreign exchange balancing, or research and development.
5) Improvement of intellectual property protection through immediate accession to the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) Agreement - In accordance with the TRIPs, China is obligated to comply with internationally accepted norms for protecting and enforcing the intellectual property rights (IPR) of U.S. and other foreign companies and individuals in China.
China has modified its intellectual property laws and regulations, including those relating to patents, trademarks, trade secrets, test data, integrated circuits, and copyrights. In addition, China has committed to strengthen the enforcement of these laws and regulations by its courts and the responsible administrative agencies.
China has further agreed that it will only
impose, apply, or enforce laws, regulations, or other measures relating to the
transfer of technology that are consistent with the WTO Agreement on
Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) and the TRIPs Agreement.
6) Adoption of technical standards and conformity assessment procedures will be more consistent with international practices - China must bring all of its technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures into conformity with the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). The same processing periods and fees will apply to both imported and domestic products and the choice of the assessment body or agency will be at the discretion of the importer.
China must apply the same technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures to both imported and domestic products by authorizing agencies to assess both types of products during an 18-month transition period.
Multiple and duplicative assessment procedures will be eliminated[10].
China will only test imported products for conformity with contractual terms at the request of the parties to the contract and will not require further conformity assessment procedures (except for random sampling) for products certified by a body that China recognizes.
China must now base technical regulations on international standards. These regulations must be developed in a transparent manner and applied equally to domestic and foreign products.
7) National treatment for internal taxes - China has agreed to ensure that its laws, regulations, and other measures relating to internal taxes and charges levied on imports comply with WTO rules and are applied uniformly to both foreign and domestic enterprises. This obligation applies not only to national taxes, but to provincial and local taxes as well.
8) Elimination of export and import subsidies - China has agreed to eliminate all subsidies on industrial goods that are prohibited under WTO rules, i.e., export and import substitution subsidies.
Table 1-5 outlines some of the agreements under the WTO that were part of China’s accession package. Although the Chinese government has made great strides in revising their laws to become WTO-consistent, structural challenges still remain, including the lack of sufficient IPR enforcement, lack of rule of law, and lack of transparency. The U.S. government is working closely with several ministries to provide technical assistance for China’s implementation of its commitments.
China will host the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. The 2008 Games will present IT and telecommunications companies with tremendous opportunities to display their products and services for the “Digital Olympics.” The Beijing Municipal Government’s Informatization Office (BIO) plans to invest $3.6 billion in information services, expand its fiber optic networks to cover all Olympic sites, introduce a mobile communication network capable of handling 500,000 calls in the Olympic site area, establish a digital network capable of high-definition television (HDTV) transmission for all Olympic venues, and install Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to cover transport routes to be used both for the Olympics and public transport. The Beijing Olympics will also be the first Olympic Games to enjoy wireless broadband third generation (3G) technology. For a more detailed discussion on Olympic Games opportunities, see Chapter 5 on Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies.
The Information Industry (II) Subgroup is one of several industry subgroups organized under the Business Development and Industrial Cooperation Working Group (BDIC) of the U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT). The II Subgroup covers the following sectors: telecommunications equipment and services, computer hardware and software, information services, semiconductors, and a variety of related electronic components. The goal of the Subgroup is to promote the development of commercial relations and bilateral trade between the United States and China in the information technology and telecommunications sectors, respectively. This is accomplished by exchanging data related to information technology; resolving commercial issues of concern to IT and telecom firms in the U.S. and China; identifying, organizing and supporting trade missions, exhibitions, conferences, seminars, and similar trade events; and considering other commercial programs that might contribute to furthering the growth and development of commercial relations between the two countries.
The U.S. co-chair is the Department of Commerce’s Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Technology Industries. The Chinese co-chair is the Director General of the Department of Foreign Affairs at the Ministry of Information Industry. Some of the primary issues the Subgroup has addressed and will continue to address include intellectual property rights protection, technology transfer requirements, Internet issues, market development, and market access improvement. The Subgroup meets on an annual basis and signs a work program that includes a combination of trade promotion events and trade policy seminars. The 2003 II Subgroup Work Plan is in the Appendix.
The APEC TEL was formed in 1990 and addresses issues such as human resource development, technology transfer and regional cooperation, and telecommunications standardization. Both government officials from APEC member economies and private sector representatives can participate in the TEL meetings and workshops, which take place biannually. The Ministry of Information Industry represents China at the APEC TEL meetings. On the U.S. government side, the State Department, the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration (ITA) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Federal Communications Commission attend the TEL meetings.
The APEC ECSG was established in 1999 after the APEC Senior Officials Meeting in Wellington, New Zealand. The ECSG meets twice a year and addresses issues such as data privacy, paperless trading, and consumer protection. Similar to the TEL, both government and private sector representatives participate in the ECSG meetings and workshops. The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation’s (MOFTEC)2 E-commerce Administration office has represented China in the ECSG. The Commerce Department’s ITA and the Federal Trade Commission participates in the ECSG. The Department of Commerce leads the U.S. delegation to the to APEC ECSG meetings, and currently serves as the chair of the Steering Group. China, Thailand, and Australia are the current vice-chairs.
Chapter 2: Telecommunications
The Chinese government has long recognized the importance of a modern telecommunications network to overall economic development and has devoted considerable attention to fostering the development of the nation’s telecommunications sector. Telecommunications was designated as one of the “pillar industries” of economic reform and over the past 10-15 years China has accomplished the largest telecommunications infrastructure build-out in world history. While this has created tremendous opportunities for foreign suppliers, those opportunities have been tempered by Chinese economic, political, and national security policies designed to promote the development of an indigenous industry and minimize the reliance on foreign vendors. Given the importance of government regulatory policies in the telecommunications sector, an understanding of the regulatory environment is a useful tool for foreign firms interested in competing in China’s telecommunications marketplace.
The Ministry of Information Industry (MII) is the principal regulatory agency for China’s telecommunications industry. MII is subject to oversight by the State Council. MII was created in March 1998 by merging the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications (MPT) with the Ministry of Electronics Industry (MEI). Wu Jichuan, who was Minister of Posts and Telecommunications at the time, became the new Minister of Information Industry. He served in that position until his retirement in March 2003, when he was replaced by Wang Xudong (see bios below).
The Ministry of Information Industry (www.mii.gov.cn) is charged with a wide variety of responsibilities. As MII states in its 2001 Annual Report, “the Ministry of Information Industry is a regulatory body in charge of the manufacture of electronic and information products, communications and the software industry, as well as the promotion of informatization of the national economy and social services in the country.” Its many duties include the development and management of China’s communications networks as well as the nation’s telecommunications and information technology equipment manufacturing industries. MII is responsible for developing equipment standards, allocating spectrum, managing satellite orbital slots, developing tariff rates for telecom services, managing emergency and disaster relief related communications systems, and managing the telecommunications numbering system and Internet domain name registration, among other duties.
MII’s responsibilities occasionally conflict and may preclude the Ministry from functioning as a truly independent regulator. Its responsibility to foster the development of China’s IT and telecom equipment industries, for example, can result in MII applying pressure to network operators to purchase Chinese-manufactured equipment rather than imported equipment.
Wu Jichuan, the former Minister of Information Industry who retired in March 2003, was the principal architect of China’s remarkable telecommunications infrastructure build-out. Wu is a graduate of the Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT) who joined MPT’s Planning and Construction Department in 1965, eventually working his way up to vice minister in 1984. He was appointed Executive Vice Governor of Henan Province in 1990 but came back to MPT as Minister in 1993 and then became the Minister of Information Industry when that agency was created in April 1998.
In his position as Minister of Posts and Telecommunications, and later Minister of Information Industry, Wu took a very conservative approach to telecommunications liberalization and deregulation. He believed in utilizing foreign capital, technology and experience to strengthen China’s own self-reliance, thus “maintaining the national sovereignty and security.” Under his guidance, MPT pursued a policy of trading market access for technology transfer in the telecom equipment sector and laid down a strict prohibition on foreign ownership, operation or management of telecommunications services operations in China. Many of these policies are being revised in the wake of China’s accession to the WTO, but the effects are likely to linger long after the policies are changed.
Wang Xudong, the former party secretary of Hebei Province
The State Administration for Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) is responsible for overseeing the operation of China’s radio, film, and television operations. This includes licensing radio and television broadcast stations, film distribution, and the country’s cable television networks. SARFT is also responsible for monitoring the content that is distributed via these media. SARFT has sought to expand the capabilities of cable television networks to provide Internet access and telecommunications services. These efforts have brought it into conflict with MII, which claims to be the only entity authorized to issue licenses for telecom and Internet service provision. Conversely, MII has indicated an interest in licensing radio and television networks, while SARFT has opposed such efforts. It is expected that the State Council will determine the future rights and responsibilities of each ministry, and ultimately, the future of the convergence of the various services.
Market
Characteristics
China’s
telecommunications equipment market is characterized by rapid growth, intense
competition, and a multitude of complex, multi-layered, political and economic
factors that must be carefully and successfully evaluated in order to achieve
success. It is important to recognize
that, while the Chinese government appears committed to foster a more competitive
telecommunications service environment, this commitment does not necessarily
mean that equipment vendors with the best technology and/or lowest prices will
succeed in the Chinese marketplace.
As
previously noted, MII is charged with promoting the development of an
indigenous information and communications technology industry in China. Prior to its WTO accession, China maintained
a number of explicit policies that were designed to limit the nation’s
dependence on foreign technology and protect China’s nascent manufacturing
industry. These included requirements
for foreign vendors to establish joint ventures with Chinese partners and to
build manufacturing facilities in China. Market access was usually conditioned
on technology transfer - the higher the level of technology a foreign company transferred
to its joint venture in China, the more market share it would be granted in
China. Imports of component parts to
feed the factories in China would often have to be offset by exports of
finished products from the factory.
A
March 1999, report by the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service office in China
noted that MII had outlined the following principles to Chinese equipment
manufacturers:
--
Investment in research will be increased to develop Chinese telecommunications
products so that China will become less dependent on imported technology;
--
Chinese telecom operators should give priority to domestic products when the
price and quality are similar to imported products;
--
Chinese-foreign joint ventures are expected to speed up technology transfer to
their Chinese partners, increase the proportion of locally sourced raw
materials, and develop new products to meet market demand.
The
effect of these policies has been demonstrated in China’s central office
switching market. Prior to 1996, foreign
suppliers and Chinese-foreign joint ventures were the dominant players in
supplying central office switching equipment for China’s network. By 1998, foreign vendors had seen their
market position seriously eroded by Chinese manufacturers.
Telecommunications Equipment Trade
China
has one of the world’s most competitive telecommunications equipment
markets. The explosive growth of the
country’s telecommunications networks long ago attracted the attention of all
the major international equipment manufacturers and all have established joint
venture manufacturing operations in China.
Motorola, Ericsson, Siemens, Alcatel, Lucent, Nokia, and Nortel are well
known in China, and a growing number of Chinese firms have developed to compete
with them. The Chinese government has
fostered the development of Chinese manufacturers through a wide range of
tariff and non-tariff barriers, and Chinese manufacturers now compete with
foreign companies, not only in the Chinese market, but in third-country markets
as well. Huawei, ZTE, Shanghai Bell,
and Datang are among the better known Chinese equipment manufacturing
companies.
U.S.
telecommunications equipment exports to China have risen at an average annual
rate of 8 percent each year since 1993, reaching a peak of $1.1 billion in
2001. However, U.S. imports of these
products from China grew more than twice as fast (19 percent) each year during
this same period to $ 3.2 billion. By
year-end 2002, U.S. telecommunications equipment exports fell sharply, losing
over a third of their value, while imports from China increased by nearly $1.4
billion. These significant changes in
trade have led to a steadily worsening U.S. telecommunications product trade
deficit with this country (Table 2-1).
TABLE
2-1: U.S. TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
TRADE
WITH CHINA, 1993-2002 ($ MILLIONS)
|
Year |
U.S.
Exports |
U.S.
Imports |
Balance |
|
1993 |
589.5 |
820.5 |
(231.0) |
|
1994 |
630.8 |
1284.2 |
(653.4) |
|
1995 |
863.3 |
1372.9 |
(509.6) |
|
1996 |
752.8 |
1201.7 |
(448.9) |
|
1997 |
780.6 |
1486.8 |
(706.2) |
|
1998 |
780.5 |
1821.6 |
(1041.1) |
|
1999 |
553.4 |
2329.9 |
(1776.5) |
|
2000 |
757.9 |
2967.5 |
(2209.6) |
|
2001 |
1120.4 |
3219.4 |
(2099.0) |
|
2002 |
723.9 |
4611.6 |
(3887.7) |
Source:
Compiled by the Office of Telecommunications Technologies,
using trade and tariff data from the
U.S. Department of Commerce,
U.S. Treasury, and U.S. International
Trade Commission.
Growing the Network
According to MII, the first telephone was installed in China in 1882. However, China’s telecom network grew very slowly and amounted to only 4 million lines as recently as 1980, or less than one telephone for every 232 people. Growth accelerated through the 1980s. By 1990, China had 12 million lines, but this was still only one telephone per 100 people. Since that time, network growth has been explosive, and China now boasts the largest wireline and wireless networks in the world. MII reported that China had 214.4 million wireline subscribers and 206.6 mobile subscribers, as of year-end 2002 (Figure 2-1). This equates to a telephone penetration ratio of approximately 16 percent for wireline and 15.5 percent for wireless, although these figures can be misleading since teledensity rates tend to be much higher in urban areas of China and significantly lower in rural areas. There is also reflected in a geographical disparity between the more densely populated eastern part of the country and the less densely populated western provinces.
The tremendous growth in China’s telecommunications network can be attributed to a number of factors. First, the government recognized the importance of telecommunications development to overall economic development. It made telecom and IT development a national priority and enacted preferential policy initiatives to promote telecommunications modernization. Second, as China’s economic development has progressed, the country’s rapidly expanding business sector has generated increased demand for additional communications services and equipment. The rise in living standards also made it possible for an increasing number of Chinese citizens to afford telephones. Finally, technological advances have contributed to network growth by making available better equipment at lower prices.

Service Providers - A Brief History
Prior to 1994, China followed the traditional model of a government-owned-and-managed “post and telecom authority” with the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications administering the nation’s postal and telephone systems. The telephone service provider operated as a national monopoly through a hierarchical structure, rising from municipal and county offices to provincial offices to the Ministry in Beijing. The first steps towards telecom sector reform occurred in the 1988 to 1991 period, when a restructuring of MPT was initiated to begin to separate the various functions of the agency into different offices. Enterprise offices were separated from government functions, separate directorates-general were established for post and telecom operations, and a variety of decision-making responsibilities were shifted from central headquarters to provincial and municipal operating entities. Reforms continued from 1991 to 1993. Provincial and municipal operators were permitted to purchase network equipment from a variety of competing MPT-approved suppliers (many of them Chinese joint ventures with some of the world’s leading manufacturers) and the terminal equipment market and the paging services sector were opened to competition, and competition was introduced in the paging services sector.
MPT’s monopoly status in the Chinese telecom services market ended in 1994 when China’s State Council approved the creation of China United Telecommunications, or China Unicom. China Unicom was supported by the Ministry of Electronics Industry, the Ministry of Railways, the Ministry of Electric Power, and approximately a dozen other state-run enterprises that had an interest in entering China’s telecom services market.
As originally proposed and approved by State Council Directive 178, China Unicom was expected to use the capacity of the pre-existing internal communications networks of the Electric Power and Railway Ministries, and equipment manufactured by MEI, to construct a network that would provide telecom service to areas of China that were not being served by MPT’s network. In turn, the establishment of this new network was generally expected to spur MPT to accelerate its infrastructure construction and service delivery schedule, which many in the Chinese government did not believe was proceeding at a satisfactory pace.
Shortly after Unicom was approved, it became obvious that its backers had much higher aspirations for the company. Rather than build a network to complement the MPT network, which essentially would mean serving only rural areas, Unicom wanted to compete with MPT in more lucrative urban markets, as well as in wireless and international communications. Unicom was seriously disadvantaged in its endeavor by the fact that MPT not only opposed its objectives, but was also the industry regulator and could stack the deck against the firm.
By early 1996, Unicom had constructed cellular networks in ten Chinese cities, but was faced with MPT’s refusal to allow Unicom to connect them to the public switched telephone network (PSTN). MPT also refused to grant Unicom a license to provide international service. When it became obvious that Unicom would not get any satisfaction from MPT, the company took its complaints to sympathetic members of the State Council, who forced MPT to connect Unicom’s cellular network to MPT’s national network.
In March, 1997, a Chinese policy research group, comprised of officials from the State Planning Commission, State Economic and Trade Commission, and the State System Restructuring Commission, recommended that the State Council issue a new directive that would recognize Unicom as a carrier authorized to compete with MPT.
The Unicom situation was apparently discussed at the 1997 National Party Congress. At the National People’s Congress in March, 1998, the creation of the new Ministry of Information Industry was announced and was charged with administering the development of both China Unicom and China Telecom.
While this government restructuring helped to level the regulatory playing field for China Unicom, it did not address one of the other major problems facing the company -- raising capital. China Unicom had a long history of difficulties in financing its infrastructure build-out and had turned to foreign firms for assistance. Since it was illegal for foreign firms to invest in telecom networks in China, Unicom resorted to a model that had been developed in China’s power sector.
Known as the China-China-Foreign (CCF) model, it required a potential foreign investor to form a joint venture with a Chinese firm to provide consulting and other related services. Under Chinese law, that joint venture was considered a “Chinese” company that then could enter into a contract with China Unicom to provide consulting and other telecommunication related services. The fee that China Unicom paid under the service contract to the JV was tied directly to the revenue generated by the actual operation of the network. It was this fee structure that provided MII with the justification that this CCF arrangement effectively constituted equity ownership, control, and operation of the network, in violation of Chinese law.
Although this model was obviously a circumvention of the intent of the Chinese prohibition on foreign participation in China’s telecom service sector, Chinese authorities turned a blind eye to the practice for several years. During this period, which ranged from 1995 through mid-1998, Unicom reportedly attracted approximately $1.4 billion in foreign investments through approximately 50 CCF deals, despite the fact that these arrangements were made in a gray legal environment.
In mid-1998, foreign investors began to receive word that their CCF investments were illegal and would have to be terminated. This policy change ultimately became the subject of intense discussion between not only Unicom and its foreign partners, but also between Chinese government officials and foreign government officials whose companies were affected by it. Ultimately, all of Unicom’s CCF deals were dissolved, reportedly on terms that were not very favorable to the foreign investors.
In early 1999, MII appointed a new management team to China Unicom, consisting of very senior officials from the Ministry, with experience in management, operations, and finance. At the time, this move was viewed as evidence that MII was committed to turning Unicom into a well-managed and viable enterprise.
Yang
Xianzu, former Executive Vice Minister of MII, was appointed Unicom Chairman
and President. Wang Jianzhou, former
Director-General of Planning Department in MII, was appointed Unicom Executive
Vice President.
Shi
Cuiming, former Chairman of China Telecom Hong Kong and former Director-General
of the Financial Department of MPT, was appointed Unicom Vice President. This appointment was widely considered by
outside observers to foretell plans to take China Unicom public, since Mr. Shi
had experience in this regard during his tenure with China Telecom Hong
Kong. See further discussion under
“Stock Offerings,” below.
The creation of China Jitong Corporation was another element of structural reform in China’s telecom sector. Authorized by the State Council in 1993, the company was established in Beijing in 1994. Jitong was charged with developing a national “information highway” network, which was known as the Golden Bridge Network. The network originally provided services to Chinese government agencies, but began offering commercial service in October 1996. In addition to the Golden Bridge project, Jitong was also given responsibility for managing a data network connecting agencies responsible for handling foreign trade data, the Golden Customs Project, and a national credit and banking card network, the Golden Card project. Although Jitong’s initial focus was on data communications, it branched out into voice services in 1999 when it began offering voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) service via pre-paid phone cards.
While MII was getting re-organized, it was also considering ways in which to implement its mandate from the State Council to create a more competitive telecommunications environment and reduce China Telecom’s market dominance. In late 1998, rumors began to circulate that China Telecom would be broken up, which were followed by restructuring the following year. China Telecom’s wireless network was spun off as a new entity, China Mobile, and the satellite operations were spun off as China Satellite. The paging business was transferred to China Unicom, thus providing a steady cash flow to that company while it was in the throes of terminating its CCF joint ventures. See discussion under “China Unicom,” above.
China Netcom, launched in late 1999, was billed as China’s “third” telecom service provider after China Telecom and China Unicom. At the time of its creation, Netcom had four principal backers: the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the State Administration of Radio, Film & Television (SARFT), the Ministry of Railways, and the Shanghai Municipal Government. The company’s business plan was predicated on the provision of VOIP services via a high-speed fiber optic network, which would enable it to provide long distance service at significantly lower rates than were being offered by China Telecom and Unicom.
The Ministry of Railways received a license from MII in late 2000 to provide all basic telecommunications services, except mobile services. The Ministry launched China Railway Telecom (CRT) with a plan to utilize its in-house telecom network to provide service to outside customers (which sounds remarkably similar to the original plan behind the creation of China Unicom). At the time it was granted its license, CRT reportedly had 40,000 kilometers of fiber optic cable installed along its 120,000 kilometers of railroad lines.
In the latter half of 2001, the State Council announced plans to split China Telecom, which still controlled the nation’s public wireline network, into two companies. China Telecom would retain the local loop networks in twenty-one of China’s southern provinces and municipal areas, while the local loop networks in ten northern provinces and municipal areas would be combined with China Netcom and China Jitong to create a much larger company that would be called China Netcom. After several months of planning for the restructuring, the split became effective in May, 2002. An interesting feature of the split was the division of China Telecom’s backbone network: China Telecom retained 70 percent of the capacity of the network, while China Netcom received the remaining 30 percent. This division effectively gave each company a presence in the other’s territory, thus setting the stage for what the government hoped would be effective competition.
As of year-end 2001, MII reported the following revenues for Chinese telecom service providers (Figure 2-2):

At year-end 2002, following the
restructuring of the industry, the Ministry of Information Industry reported
the following market shares for Chinese telecom service providers, in terms of
revenue (Figure 2-3):

Source:
Ministry of Information Industry
There
are currently only two companies authorized to provide mobile communications
services in China: China Mobile and
China Unicom. China Mobile, which was
spun-off from China Telecom in 1999, is the dominant player in the market, and
has about two-thirds of the country’s 200+ million mobile subscribers (as of
year-end 2002). The company operates a
nationwide cellular network based on the GSM (global system mobile) standard.
China
Unicom had almost 70 million subscribers at year-end 2002. The firm also operates a nationwide GSM
cellular network, but in 2001 it began deploying a second wireless network
based on the CDMA (code division multiple access) standard. As of year-end 2002, Unicom claimed to have
about 7 million CDMA subscribers, representing about 10 percent of its total
subscriber base.
In
addition to the mobile networks operated by China Mobile and China Unicom,
China Telecom and China Netcom operate wireless networks based on the PHS
(personal handy phone) standard. These
systems are officially classified by MII as an extension of fixed line networks
and have the same rates as fixed line service.
Although the systems do not permit roaming from one service area to
another, they do offer mobile service within the municipal system in which they
are licensed. They are generally
marketed as a less expensive alternative to China Mobile’s and China Unicom’s
wireless services. As of year-end 2002,
there were reported to be approximately 15 million subscribers to these
services. China Mobile and China Unicom
have begun to express concerns to MII that these services are a violation of
the mobile licensing restrictions imposed on China Telecom and China Netcom.
There
is currently intense interest and speculation surrounding China’s plans for 3G
(third generation) wireless technologies.
There are reportedly three standards being evaluated by the MII: WCDMA, CDMA-2000, and TD-SCDMA. The Chinese view WCDMA as a “European”
standard, CDMA-2000 as an “American” standard, and TD-SCDMA as a “Chinese”
standard, and these perceptions are expected to influence the licensing of 3G
technologies.
Recent
press reports have cited MII officials as indicating that four 3G licenses will
be issued (to China Mobile, China Unicom, China Telecom and China Netcom) and
that each operator will be free to choose its preferred standard. Most observers, however, believe that
pressure will be exerted on at least one of the operators to go with the
TD-SCDMA standard. The stakes will be
very important, not only for operators, but also for equipment vendors, most of
which have cast their lots with one or another, or sometimes multiple,
standards.
Stock Offerings
In an
effort to raise outside capital to finance additional infrastructure build-out,
MPT put forward a proposal in 1997 to list the assets of a limited number of
its China Telecom mobile operations on foreign stock exchanges. This model proved to be quite successful in
raising capital without ceding any management control to outside
interests. The initial public offering
(IPO) of China Telecom assets was not only expanded, but was followed by
additional offerings from other companies.
Following is a brief summary of these exercises.
China
Telecom (Hong Kong)/China Mobile (Hong Kong)
(www.chinamobilehk.com)
In
1997, MPT received permission from the State Council to merge the assets of two
of its most profitable provincial cellular operations, Guangdong Mobile and
Zhejiang Mobile, into a new entity that would be listed on the Hong Kong and
New York stock exchanges. The new
company was incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong on September 3, 1997, as
“China Telecom (Hong Kong) Ltd. (CTHK).
MPT retained control of 75.1 percent of the shares of the company while
the remaining shares were sold via an IPO in October, 1997, that netted
approximately $4.2 billion. This
listing was considered very successful for MPT. It raised significant funds without giving up any management control
of the assets, but also raised the very real question of what the outside
investors were actually receiving for their money.
In
1998, China Telecom (Hong Kong) added Jiangsu Mobile to its holdings for
approximately U.S. $4 billion and, in 1999, bought three more provincial mobile
networks -- Fujian Mobile, Henan Mobile and Hainan Mobile -- while raising an
additional $2.5 billion in a stock and bond offering. By year-end 1999, CTHK’s six provincial networks accounted for 36
percent of China’s total mobile subscribers.
In May, 2000, the company changed its name to China Mobile (Hong Kong),
following the restructuring of the mainland China Telecom into four separate
operating units. The new mainland China
Mobile Communications Corp. was granted the ownership of China Mobile (Hong
Kong).
China
Mobile (Hong Kong) has continued to acquire additional networks and, as of
year-end 2002, owned mobile networks in 21 provinces, municipalities and
autonomous regions in China, including Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Fujian,
Henan, Hainan, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Shangdong, Guangxi,
Anhui, Jiangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Hubei, Hunan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi.
The
Company's major shareholder is China Mobile (Hong Kong) Group Limited, which,
as of July 1, 2002, indirectly held an
equity interest of approximately 75.7 percent in the Company through a
wholly-owned subsidiary, China Mobile Hong Kong (BVI) Limited. Public investors
hold the remaining stock in the company, estimated at 24.3 percent.
China
Unicom Ltd.
(www.chinaunicom.com.hk)
China
Unicom Limited was incorporated in Hong Kong in February 2000. The initial assets of the company included
GSM cellular networks in twelve provinces, its nationwide paging businesses,
and its nationwide wireline assets.
Unicom issued stock on the New York and Hong Kong exchanges in June,
2000, raising $5.65 billion. The public
stock offering represented 22.5 percent of the company’s shares; the remaining
77.5 percent of shares were controlled by the mainland parent company.
In
September 2002, China Unicom launched a domestic IPO on the Shanghai exchange,
raising $1.4 billion for 23.4 percent of shares in the company’s China
assets. The funds raised were
reportedly to be used to expand the company’s CDMA network.
The “new” China Telecom went public with a listing of its four most profitable provincial networks on the Hong Kong and New York stock exchanges in November 2002. The company was forced to scale back its plans to raise $3.68 billion with the offering, but did raise $1.43 billion. In January 2003, the South China Morning Post reported that the company planned to purchase 5 more provincial networks, for an estimated price of $4 billion, in mid-2003.
Telecommunications Products
China
has agreed to wide-ranging reforms affecting trade in goods through its
accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). These changes should result in better access for foreign
suppliers to the Chinese market by eliminating various trade-restrictive
requirements and incentives that favored domestic Chinese-manufactured
goods. Below are some of the changes
that will affect the telecom and IT sectors.
See the overview chapter (Chapter 1) for a more detailed discussion on
the impact of China’s WTO membership on IT and telecommunications products.
Tariffs: China agreed to sign on to the Information
Technology Agreement (ITA) on accession, thereby committing to eliminate
tariffs on all products covered by the ITA. Tariff reductions from its previous
applied average of 13% were initiated upon accession. Tariffs on two-thirds of
the ITA products were eliminated by January 1, 2003, and tariffs on all the
remaining products will be eliminated by January 1, 2005.
Local Content: China agreed to
eliminate local content requirements immediately after accession to the World
Trade Organization and not to enforce provisions in existing contracts that
impose this requirement.
Technology Transfer: China will eliminate
technology transfer requirements and offsets as a condition for investment
approval or importation. The terms and
conditions of any transfer of technology will be agreed between the parties to
a contract and not imposed by the government.
Exports
from the United States will no longer face this barrier, and companies that
want to invest
in
China can negotiate these terms without interference from the Government of
China. China will also have to provide
better intellectual property protection for technology that is transferred and
eliminate requirements mandating that the Chinese partner in a joint venture
gains ownership of trade secrets after a certain number of years.
China has divided its telecommunications services sector into four categories: value-added services, paging services, mobile services, and other basic services. Each category, except mobile communications, has a 3-stage implementation plan. Mobile communications has a 4- stage implementation plan. Each stage allows an increased level of foreign investment and/or opens a larger geographic area to foreign participation.
The implementation schedules for value-added services and paging services in stage one of China’s WTO accession commitments allow foreign entities to hold up to a 30 percent share of a joint venture with Chinese partners and offer services in the three cities of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, effective on the date of accession (December 2001). Stage two became effective in December 2002 (one year after the date of accession) and allows foreign entities to hold up to a 49 percent share of a joint venture offering value-added or paging services in the preceding 3 cities, plus 14 additional cities (Chengdu, Chongqing, Dalian, Fuzhou, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Ningbo, Qingdao, Shenyang, Shenzen, Xiamen, Xian, Taiyuan, and Wuhan). Stage three becomes effective in December 2003 and will allow foreign entities to own a 50 percent share in a joint venture that will be permitted to offer value-added or paging services with no geographical restrictions.
The implementation schedule for foreign investment in mobile services allows, as of the date of China’s accession to the WTO, foreign entities to hold a 25 percent share of a joint venture offering mobile service in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. As of December 2002, foreign entities can hold a 35 percent share in a joint venture offering service in the original three cities plus the 14 additional cities listed above. In December 2004, the allowable foreign investment share rises to 49 percent of a joint venture, but the service area remains restricted to the 17 cities. In December 2006, the geographic restrictions are lifted, but the foreign investment limit remains at 49 percent.
The basic telecommunications services sector remains closed to foreign investment until December, 2004. At that time, foreign entities may hold up to 25 percent of a joint venture offering service in the three cities of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Two years later, in December, 2006, the foreign investment ceiling rises to 35 percent and the 14 additional cities become open to service. The final stage, effective in December, 2007, raises the foreign investment ceiling to 49 percent with no geographic restrictions.
The following paragraphs summarize these commitments:
For value-added services (electronic mail, voice mail, on line information and database retrieval, electronic data interchange, enhanced facsimile, code and protocol conversion, on-line information and data processing, including transaction processing) and paging services:
Phase Date of effect Foreign investment limit Applicable to the geographic areas of:
1 Upon accession 30 percent Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou
2 One year after 49 percent Above plus 14 additional cities*
accession
3 Two years after 50 percent All of China
accession
For mobile voice and data services (analog and digital cellular services, personal communications services):
Phase Date of effect Foreign investment limit Applicable to the geographic areas of:
1 Upon 25 percent Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou
accession
2 One year after 35 percent Above plus 14 additional cities*
accession
3 Three years after 49 percent Same as above
accession
4 Five years after 49 percent All of China
accession
For domestic basic services (voice services, packet switched data transmission services, circuit switched data transmission services, and facsimile services) and international basic services (voice services, packet switched data services, circuit switched data services, facsimile services, and international closed user group voice and data services):
Phase Date of effect Foreign investment limit Applicable to the geographic areas of:
1 Three years after 25 percent Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou
accession
2 Five years after 35 percent Above plus 14 additional cities*
accession
3 Six years after 49 percent All of China
accession
* Chengdu, Chongqing, Dalian, Fuzhou, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Ningbo, Qingdao, Shenyang, Shenzen, Xiamen, Xian, Taiyuan, and Wuhan
In addition to permitting foreign investment in its telecommunications services sector, China also agreed to undertake the pro-competitive regulatory obligations contained in the Reference Paper of the WTO Agreement on Basic Telecommunications Services. The Reference Paper includes obligations to establish an independent regulator, define interconnection rights, and prohibit anti-competitive practices.
China’s accession agreement includes the following footnotes:
1. China’s commitments are scheduled in accordance with the consensus of the parties to the WTO Agreement on Basic Telecommunications Services that services may be offered on a facilities or resale basis and via any technology (technology neutral).
2. All international telecommunications services shall go through gateways established with the approval of China’s telecommunications authorities, which will act as an independent regulatory authority in accordance with the principles of paragraph 5 of the Reference Paper.
3. Further liberalization of this sector, including with respect to the foreign equity participation permitted, will be discussed in the services negotiations during the round of trade talks initiated in Doha.
Foreign Investment Regulations
In accordance with China’s commitment to open its telecommunications services sector to foreign investment, the State Council issued State Council Order 333, Regulations on Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (FITE), in December 2001, that became effective January 1, 2002. These regulations define the terms for foreign companies that want to invest in China’s telecommunications services sector.
Any foreign investment in China’s telecommunications services operation is required to be in the form of a joint venture with a Chinese partner, in accordance with China’s WTO commitments, and is defined in the Foreign Investment Regulations as a “foreign invested telecom enterprise,” or FITE.
The Foreign Investment Regulations divides FITEs into two categories: those that provide basic telecom services and those that engage in value-added services. Each of these categories is further subdivided into two further categories: those that provide services on a national basis, or between provinces, autonomous regions and municipal entities; and those that provide service within a province, autonomous region, or municipal entity.
Each of these four types of FITEs is required to meet specific requirements in terms of registered capital, ranging from 1 million RMB for an intra-provincial value-added services provider to 2 billion RMB for a nationwide or inter-provincial/autonomous regional/municipal basic telecom service provider.
The regulations also outline specific requirements for the principal Chinese and foreign entities in the FITE. Both the principal Chinese and foreign investors in a basic telecom services FITE must “have capital and professionals necessary for the services provided.” Foreign investors in either basic or value-added FITEs are required to “have a record of sound performance and operating experience in providing” basic or value-added services.
The regulations outline the procedures and requirements for applying for service licenses and the government’s review and approval process. As of year-end 2002, MII reported that no applications for FITEs had been filed. While the exact reasons for this inactivity are not known, several possibilities have been proposed. The most widely accepted rationale is that the worldwide slump in the telecommunications industry, combined with what are generally regarded as steep capitalization requirements for establishing a FITE and foreign investment limits of less than 50 percent, have limited the ability and interest on the part of qualified foreign firms to invest in the Chinese telecom services market.
The foreign investment regulations for telecom services clearly illustrate the old maxim that “the devil is in the details.” For example, China’s WTO offer on basic services simply states that foreign companies will ultimately be allowed to invest up to 49 percent in a Chinese telecom company providing infrastructure-based services, but the foreign investment regulations stipulate that the joint venture must have 2 billion RMB in registered capital. The regulation requiring that foreign investors “have a record of sound performance and operating experience in providing” basic or value-added services is not defined, and raises questions as to what constitutes a “record of sound performance and operating experience.”
Telecommunications
Law
The
development of China’s telecommunications law has been a long and laborious
process and is not yet finished. The State Council originally tasked MPT with
developing a national telecommunications law approximately ten years ago. Over the course of time, the development
process had almost become an annual ritual.
MPT
(and later its successor organization, the MII) would deliver a draft law to
the State Council for consideration.
Other ministries and agencies would object to the law because it
generally did little more than enshrine the status quo -- i.e., China Telecom
would remain the dominant national carrier and MPT would look after China Telecom’s
interests. The State Council would send
the draft law back to MPT with instructions to come up with more
pro-competitive regulations. And the
whole process would be repeated the following year.
In
2000, MII released a document titled “Regulations on Telecommunications of the
People’s Republic of China.” This document is generally regarded as a precursor
to what will become China’s telecommunications law. The “Regulations” have been implemented and their effects are
being carefully monitored to determine whether any fine-tuning will be
necessary before they are submitted to the State Council for adoption as law.
The
regulations discuss the lines of responsibility and authority for managing
China’s telecommunications sector, define basic and value added services, and
outline the rules for business licensing, interconnection requirements,
tariffs, and resource allocation.
The regulations also specify the obligations of telecom service providers to their customers and the public interest, the infrastructure and facilities build-out requirements, and the rules governing network protection, public safety, fair competition and privacy. Penalties for violations of the regulations are also spelled out.
Given
the long history of foot-dragging by MPT (and to a lesser extent, its
successor, MII), most outside observers viewed the new regulations with
pleasant surprise. The regulations
provided some real evidence that the MII had shifted its focus from being a
champion and protector of China Telecom to becoming an independent regulatory
agency that would promote fair and open competition among all players.
According to the International Data Corporation (IDC), China’s market for IT products and services reached $22 billion in 2002 and is expected to exceed $40.2 billion by 2006, representing nearly a 16.3 percent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during these years. Meanwhile, in that same period, the Asia-Pacific region will grow at 6.5 percent CAGR. In 2002, China surpassed Australia to become the Asia-Pacific region’s second largest IT market, after Japan, representing nearly 14 percent of the regional spending.
China Ranks Third in Electronics and Second in
Worldwide IT Hardware Production
One year after accession to the WTO, China has surpassed Taiwan to become the
world’s third largest electronic information producer with sales volumes of 1.4
trillion RMB (approximately 170 billion U.S. dollars).[12] MII predicts that in 2003, China’s exports
of electronic and information products[13]
will reach $100 billion and those of the software and integrated circuit (IC)
industry will reach $14.5 billion.
Figure 3-2: IT Hardware
Production, in the United States, China, Japan, and Taiwan, 1999-2002

Source:
JEITA, The Yearbook of World Electronics Data, EIAK, MIC, November 2002

China’s industrial policies have favored the development of the computer hardware industry, leading to the emergence of successful personal computer (PC) makers, such as the Legend and Founder Groups. Their success is evidenced not only in China but also throughout the Asia-Pacific region. In 2002, Legend and Founder were among the top five PC makers in the region, along with multinationals Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Dell (Table 3-1). In the same year, China surpassed Japan to become the second largest PC market in the world, behind only the United States.
Table 3-1: Top 5 PC Makers in
Asia-Pacific Region (excluding Japan) in 2002
|
Company
by Rank Order |
Market Share (percent) |
|
13 |
|
9 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
5 |
Source:
IDC, 2003
Competition in China’s domestic PC market is fierce, with domestic PC makers, such as Legend, Founder, and Tsinghua Tofang, maintaining half of the market share. Legend Computer alone dominates the domestic PC market with a 30 percent market share. Foreign PC makers, such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard, had to form joint ventures in the past in order to gain market access into China. Even today, as China is transitioning into a market economy, these same multinationals, some of which have wholly-owned establishments in China, still face challenges in pricing and competing with the local PC makers’ close-knit relationships with government buyers. In 2002, Dell Computer was selling a low-end model on the market for 4,798 RMB (approximately $586) and cut prices on mid- to high-end models as well in order to gain market share. These price cuts resulted in an increase of 38 percent in PC units sold over the previous year and an 8 percent growth in sales in the first nine months of 2002. Dell’s strategy to lower prices has also been countered by Legend’s 14 percent price cut on its high-end Tianlin PC to 7,999 RMB (approximately $976), which underscores the degree of competition in China as Legend and the other domestic PC makers maintain the lion’s share of the domestic PC market.[14]
The government’s emphasis on increasing the use of information technologies in schools, government, and businesses has led to increased spending on computer hardware. In 2001, China ranked fourth in the world for installed bases in PCs, ranked third in the world for installed bases in the government and education segments of the market, and sixth in the home segment.[15]
The combination of worldwide PC price declines and the government’s support of e-government and distance learning have spurred the increase of PC sales. A nationwide sampling survey showed that by the end of 2001, 38 percent of households in the provincial capitals and municipalities owned computers, compared to 28 percent in 2000.
MII estimates that unit PC sales have risen at a 67 percent average annual rate since 1993. According to the China Center for Information Industry Development (CCID) under MII, China’s output of desktop PCs reached 6.7 million units in 2001, an increase of nearly 11 percent over the previous year, accounting for 76 percent of China’s domestic computer systems market. Northern, Eastern, and Southern China (coastal areas) represented the majority of the purchases. Domestic manufacturers have captured more than 70 percent of desktop sales while U.S. firms have held much of the remainder.
However, competition among desktop PC manufacturers will intensify as the demand for notebooks increase and desktop makers expand their product lines to include notebook computers. The notebook PC market in China is growing rapidly at an annual rate of nearly 40 percent according to the Gartner group. CCID estimates that more than 365,000 notebooks were sold in the first six months of 2002, representing a 44 percent increase over the same period last year. The demand for portable computers is spurred by consumers’ desires for mobility, adoption of wireless products, and price declines due to cheaper component costs. According to IDC, the average price of notebooks decreased 18 percent from $2,261 in 2000 to $2,171 in 2001. In 2001, many vendors also introduced notebooks priced at less than 10,000 RMB (approximately $1220). Intense competition in this segment has driven some major local vendors such as Great Wall, Hisense, and Langchao out of the notebook PC market due to difficulties in gaining market share. The distinguishing factor for market leaders Legend, IBM, Toshiba, and Dell has been their ability to provide reliable after-sales service in addition to price and product quality.
CCID also predicts that the PC server market will grow steadily at 26 percent CAGR between 2002 and 2006. Commercial users are still the major users in China's server market, followed by the education and government segments. According to the China Economic Information, multinationals such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard still maintain the market lead in the high-end server market, whereas domestic server makers control the middle- to low-end markets. The major driver for further growth in this sector is the government’s emphasis to increase the use of information technologies among universities, government agencies, and business enterprises.
Local producers, such as Minren, Legend (30 percent market share), and Hi-Tech Wealth, dominate China’s handheld market due to the Chinese language interface requirements and the need for foreign vendors to localize their solutions. In order to penetrate the China handheld market, foreign companies, such as Palm of the United States, are creating strategic partnerships with local producers. Palm will license its operating system platform to companies such as Legend to develop localized versions of software solutions to run on its platform.
According to IDC, the data storage market in China totaled $474 million in 2002, and is expected to reach $800 million by 2006, representing a CAGR of 14 percent during this period. Growth in this market will be driven by China’s successful bid on the 2008 Olympic Games and the deployment of digital television programs which will require an enormous amount of storage capacity, as well as scheduled upgrades in storage capabilities in the healthcare and education segments of the economy.
Table 3-2: Market Share for
Handheld Computer Devices in Asia-Pacific, 2002
|
|
Country by Rank
Order
|
Market Share (percent)
|
1.
China
|
69
|
2.
South Korea
|
8
|
3.
Taiwan
|
6
|
4.
Hong Kong
|
5
|
4.
Singapore
|
5
|
Rest
of Asia-Pacific
|
8
|
Source: IDC, 2002
|
|
The volume of trade in IT hardware (computer systems and peripherals) between China and the United States has nearly tripled between 1998 and 2002. During this period, U.S. imports have increased significantly at a CAGR of 34 percent, compared to U.S. exports which increased at only a 2 percent CAGR. In 2002, the United States exported $579 million of computer equipment to China while importing over $9 billion worth of hardware. In that same year, China was the ninth largest export market for U.S. computer equipment, while ranking first among hardware suppliers to the United States. Although the volume of trade has increased significantly over the years, the trade deficit has quadrupled since 1998 (Figure 3-3). U.S. imports from China increased 53 percent in 2002 while U.S. exports to China decreased 26 percent that year. China’s accession to the WTO will contribute to the increased volume of trade between the two countries as U.S. and Chinese IT suppliers will be able to take advantage of the tariff reductions on certain IT equipment and receive equal legal and regulatory treatment as domestic suppliers.
Figure 3-3: U.S. Trade with
China in Computer Equipment
and Peripherals

Source:
Official statistics from the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Treasury,
and the International Trade Commission.
The Chinese market for IT hardware is relatively open compared to that for services. The maturity of China’s manufacturing capabilities, public sector support for investment in the sector, and the growth of the domestic industry are contributing factors to the Chinese government’s willingness to allow greater competition in the hardware segment. With China’s accession to the WTO, foreign hardware producers anticipate equal access to and treatment in the China market as enjoyed by their local competitors in certain areas such as tariffs and certification requirements.
Reduced Tariffs. Between 1992 and 1999, China reduced its tariff rates five times, from an average rate of 43 percent to 17 percent. Upon accession to the WTO in December 2001, China agreed to sign the Information Technology Agreement (ITA). This means that China will eliminate tariffs on two-thirds of the products under the ITA by January 1, 2003 and for all the remaining products by January 1, 2005. Industry estimates that U.S. IT firms will save nearly $500 million in tariffs in 2002 alone. According to MII, 122 ITA products have already been exempted from duties since January 1, 2002, and that tariffs have been reduced on average from 12.5 percent to 3.5 percent by the beginning of 2002.
Certification requirements. Prior to China’s accession to the WTO, U.S. IT companies selling their products in China required two marks – one to satisfy China’s import requirements (CCIB mark) and one to permit the sale of the product in the domestic market (CCEE or Great Wall mark) for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and safety. The two marks have been merged into a new China Compulsory Certification (CCC) mark, required on all products - domestic and imports - on a 132-product list. There are 12 IT products affected by the CCC mark.[16] The Certification and Accreditation Administration of China (CNCA), under the State General Administration for Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ), administers the CCC mark. The new system became effective May 1, 2002 and grants existing CCIB and CCEE mark approved products a 12-month conversion period (Figure 3-4).
Figure 3-4: Examples of the CCC Mark
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Source: CNCA,
2002
|
|||
China’s software market has experienced steady growth, exceeding 30 percent year-on-year since 1999. According to IDC, China’s packaged software market reached $2.1 billion in 2002. By 2006, the segment is expected to more than double in size to $5.3 billion. Despite this growth, the software segment will still be less than one-sixth of the overall IT sector (Figure 3-5).

Source: IDC, 2003

CCID estimates that in 2001, 64 percent of the software market was comprised of applications, 30 percent consisted of platform software, and the remainder was middleware.
Most of China’s software purchases have been in the low-end applications market, as only 10 percent of Chinese enterprises have deployed enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions and only 6 percent are using supply chain management (SCM) solutions. However, these trends in the market are quickly changing as China’s consumers become more exposed to international technology trends. According to CCID Consulting, sales of ERP software reached 870 million RMB (approximately $106 million) in 2001, representing 71 percent increase over 2000.
As the number of Internet users continues to rise, the demand for security-related software has also grown. According to the Hong Kong Trade Development Council, China’s firewall and anti-virus software market represented 33 percent and 39 percent, respectively, of the overall software segment of the IT market. The number of domestic software vendors offering solutions has also increased significantly in a very short period of time. Jiangmin, Kingsoft, and Rising are among the domestic market leaders. These solutions providers are targeting two main clienteles – those who play games regularly on the Internet and government agencies requiring network security.
China’s successful bid for the 2008 Olympic Games as well as its membership in the WTO will be the main drivers for the growth in the software market and industry over the next several years. The heavy IT purchasers in the banking and telecommunications sectors are also becoming more sophisticated in their requirements. In late 2001, some of China’s telecommunications companies began to require Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) compliance from their software suppliers.[17] As domestic companies become more attuned to the technology demands of their customers, software vendors selling in China will need to meet these needs. Domestic software developers, in particular, will need to improve their software development skills to compete effectively in the domestic market against the more experienced foreign software vendors.
On the supply side, most domestic software developers have focused on developing low-end applications software (e.g., accounting and financial management software), where they have captured 90 percent of the market, according to China Economic Information. Local companies have been able to control the market with niche applications, such as accounting software, because accounting methods in China differ from other parts of the world. They are able to provide the best and most appropriate solutions for consumers in this functional area. Foreign software companies continue to control the high-end market, such as the customer relationship management (CRM) and supply chain management (SCM) segments. Companies such as SAP (Germany) and Oracle (United States) maintain a strong presence in the market because their complete product lines allow customers to not only manage their financial systems centrally, but also manage their supply chain and plan future production.
According to CCID Consulting, the platform software market reached 8.6 billion RMB in 2001 (approximately $1 billion). The open source platform movement has caught the attention of Chinese government leaders in the past few years. IDC predicts that client-based Linux usage will grow 39 percent, compared to 11 percent for Windows usage, and server-based Linux usage will grow 41 percent annually compared to only 8 percent for Windows servers. Authorities have found the Linux open source model appealing compared to proprietary software such as those marketed by Microsoft and other Unix suppliers because it allows them to monitor what computer users are doing more closely, and the source code is free. In addition, because the source code can be viewed and further developed by anyone, authorities also believe that Linux applications could more quickly help spur the growth of a more sophisticated domestic software industry and enhance the development of China’s own operating system.
As a result, MII and the Chinese Academy of Sciences have invested in a Linux-based software distribution company, named Red Flag Linux. As an effort to widely distribute Linux throughout the country, Red Flag Linux will donate 2,000 copies of the Linux operating system to schools throughout China. Despite the popularity of the open source model among government authorities in China, Microsoft Windows operating systems will continue to maintain the dominant share in the platform market due to their user-friendliness and the variety of Chinese-language applications developed for them. In addition, China’s rampant piracy problems will prevent the widespread use of Linux. Experts estimate that 90 percent of Windows operating systems are unlicensed copies that sell for less than one dollar on the black market. Microsoft has recognized the Chinese government’s interest in the open source platform, and during Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates’ meeting with President Jiang Zemin in late February 2003, he agreed to provide the Chinese government access to the Windows source code. On February 28, 2003, China’s Information Technology Security Certification Center signed an agreement with Microsoft to participate in the company’s Government Security Program. This program permits government officials to receive controlled access to the Windows source code and other technical information to address their national security concerns.
Over the years, China has cultivated a successful domestic hardware industry through state-funded research and development of new technologies, as well as tax incentives. In addition, hardware producers have traditionally bundled software into the hardware as part of the total package to be sold on the market. As a result, the software industry in China lags significantly behind world market leaders. China’s top leaders have recognized this disparity and have shifted industrial policies in favor of the development of the software industry (Table 3-3). China has issued a number of policies ranging from export incentives to value-added tax rebates and financial assistance to small businesses, as well as laws addressing intellectual property rights protection.
Table 3-3: Examples of Regulations Governing the
Software Industry in China, 2000 - 2002 |
||
|
Law |
Issuing
Agency |
Summary |
|
Clarification
on Restriction on Use of Encryption Products (2000) |
General Office of the State Encryption Administration Commission |
Provides
clarification to October 1999 encryption regulations requiring all products
with encryption technology be registered with the State Encryption
Administration. The clarification
notice states that only products that include encryption as their core
technology will require registration.
In other words, wireless handsets and operating systems software would
not require registration. |
|
Notice
of Certain Policies to Promote the Software and Integrated Circuit Industry
Development (2000) |
State Council |
Outlines
a number of incentive policies to encourage the development of a domestic
software and integrated circuits industry, including: a venture capital
mechanism to help finance software companies, establishment of software
parks, and value-added tax rebates to be used for research and development of
targeted industries.[18] |
|
Software
Enterprise Recognition Standards and Administration Measures (2000) |
Ministry of Information Industry, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Administration of Taxation |
Describes
the rules and procedures under which software companies can qualify for
incentives under the “Notice of Certain Policies to Promote the Software and
Integrated Circuit Industry Development.”
Computer software industry associations are authorized as the
“recognition bodies.” Among
requirements of a qualified software company include a 35 percent annual
income comprised of software sales. |
|
Notice
Concerning Issues Related to the Export of Software (2001) |
Ministry of Information Industry, Ministry of
Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, State Administration of Taxation,
General Administration of Customs, State Administration of Foreign Exchange,
State Statistics Bureau |
Describes
incentives to encourage software exports.
These incentives include export rights, financial incentives for
small- to medium-sized businesses, financial assistance to receive Capability
Maturity Model (CMM) certification, and favorable rules for foreign exchange
obtained from exports. |
|
Registration
of Copyright in Computer Software (2002) |
National
Copyright Administration |
Registration
of copyright in software of exclusive license and assignment contracts;
qualifying software must be independently developed or have significant
value-added functionality after receiving permission from the original
copyright holder. |
Source: China
Legal Change
|
|
|
China’s goal is to increase its share of the world’s software market from its current share of 1.2 percent to 3 percent by 2005. Chen Chong, President of the China Software Industry Association, predicts that China’s software and related services industry will be worth 250 billion RMB (approximately $30.5 billion) by 2005. In addition, China will have over 20 software companies with annual revenues exceeding 1 billion RMB (approximately $125 million) and will popularize brand names for over 100 software products. In order to accomplish this goal, China’s software companies would need to control over 60 percent of the domestic market and export $3 billion annually. China will also train to produce 20,000 to 30,000 software professionals annually in order to realize this goal.
According to Chen, the domestic software industry’s sales rose 39 percent in 2001 to 33 billion RMB (approximately $4 billion). China has over 10,000 enterprises and 400,000 people engaged in the software and software services industry. By 2002, China had 1,023 higher education institutions that offered computer and software programs, recruiting a total of 586,000 students. The Ministry of Education and the State Development Planning Commission have also established 35 software colleges to train and develop a skilled base of software programmers.[19]
In June 2001, the State Development Planning Commission (SDPC)[20] and MII granted licenses to eleven software bases to speed up the development of the domestic software industry. All eleven software bases are located in relatively large cities, near universities and scientific institutions.[21] Prior to the establishment of the software bases, China already had approximately 48 software parks that were part of high-tech zones spread throughout the country and administered by the Ministry of Science and Technology through China’s Torch Program (see “Overview Chapter”) to develop the high-tech industry.
China is increasingly becoming known for software outsourcing. India, the second largest software exporting country after the United States, is watching the development of the Chinese software industry very closely to gauge how soon China will become a significant threat to India’s own industry. Although China’s leaders are attempting to duplicate the Bangalore software development model, many structural impediments remain in the short-term that will inhibit fast growth of the industry.
First of all, the majority of software programming in China is for the outsourcing segment. The quality of software developers is not comparable to that of professionals in more mature software markets. Only a few domestic software companies have received the capability maturity model (CMM) certification, which is an internationally accepted standard for assessing the level and quality of software development processes.
Secondly, China currently lacks an entrepreneurial environment that fosters innovation. Software programming and development require imagination as well as business intuition. The product life cycle of software is so short that, in order to beat the competitor to the marketplace and fulfill the needs of the consumers, innovative software developers are increasingly required for suppliers to effectively survive in the software market. Even though China has established several software colleges and software bases to encourage innovation, it still remains to be seen whether training programs will effectively foster the entrepreneurial spirit seen in the “Silicon Valleys” of the world.
While China has established several software parks, encouraged universities to develop software training programs, and provided tax and investment incentives for software development, the government has also recognized that the alarming piracy rate remains the most outstanding hindrance to the growth of China’s software industry.
Piracy is still a serious problem.
According to the Business Software Alliance’s June 2002 Piracy Study, China had a 92 percent business software piracy rate in 2001, accounting for nearly $1.7 billion in retail software revenue losses due to copyright violations (Figure 3-6). Although the piracy rate did decrease two percentage points from 2000, the dollar value of losses increased by over $500 million. Since 1996, China has not been able to reduce its piracy rate to below 90 percent. It had the second highest piracy rate in the Asia-Pacific region, which averaged 54 percent in 2001, and accounted for 35 percent of the revenue losses in the region due to piracy. In comparison to other parts of the world with strong software markets, such as North America and Western Europe where the piracy rates in 2001 averaged 26 percent and 37 percent, respectively, China needs to strengthen its intellectual property rights protection laws and enforcement mechanisms at the national, provincial, and municipal levels significantly to develop a domestic software industry and compete internationally.
Figure 3-6: Piracy Rate in
China vs. Revenue Lost Due to Piracy, 1996-2001

Source:
Business Software Alliance
The largest obstacle to deterring piracy in China is corporate end-user piracy. While PC prices have declined significantly over the years, packaged software prices have not. Using pirated versions of applications software sold on the black market for a fraction of the cost of the legal licensed version is a regular practice among most businesses. The Computer Software Protection Regulations define rights and obligations of computer software use but do not explicitly prohibit software piracy. Copyright authorities at the local level are usually small offices, making enforcement quite difficult. China’s accession to the WTO and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) will pressure China to become more aggressive in enforcing its intellectual property rights protection laws.
Despite China’s membership in the WTO and the creation of policies that encourage investment in the software sector, government authorities have created situations that favor state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in some cases. As part of a government contract, a government agency could require companies to obtain a Certification of Capability and Quality that is issued by MII at the national, provincial, and municipal levels.[22] Whether MII will grant this certificate depends on a firm’s total net assets, registered capital, and annual revenues, rather than the ability of the company to complete the work requested. By most accounts, it is very difficult for a private sector company to receive such a certificate based on these standards.[23]
According to IDC, China’s market for IT services is expected to reach $4.7 billion in 2003, representing an increase of nearly 25 percent over the previous year (Figure 3-7). In the next four years, China’s IT services market is expected to reach $11.7 billion, growing at CAGR of nearly 26 percent between 2003 and 2007.
FIGURE 4-7:
IT SERVICES MARKET AND GROWTH, 2002-2007

Source:
IDC. 2003
Implementation services represent the largest proportion of IT services market in China (Figure 3-8), followed by operations management services. In 2002, implementation services reached nearly $1.8 billion, which represents 38 percent of the total IT services market. By 2007, this segment will exceed $5.5 billion and account for 47 percent of the total market. While IT services represents a relatively small portion of the total IT market compared to hardware, this segment is expected to grow substantially as the notion of procuring IT services becomes more widely accepted in China.
FIGURE 3-8: IT SERVICES MARKET IN CHINA BY SEGMENT
IN 2002 AND 2007 (MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS)

Source:
IDC. 2003
Local companies, such as Digital China and Legend, control the IT services market in China. In 2002, eight Chinese companies were among the top ten IT services providers. Their established sales networks among banks, manufacturers, and government agencies for computer hardware helped strengthen their client base for IT services. IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and EDS are among the major U.S. players in this market segment.
According to the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), China’s total bandwidth has reached 2.8 giga bits per second (Gbps). China currently has five Internet backbones: China Telecom’s ChinaNet, China Unicom’s UniNet, China Golden Bridge Network (China GBNet), China Science and Technology Network (CSTNet), and China Education and Research Network (CERNet). Two of the five networks are run by commercial operators - China Telecom’s ChinaNet, which is the largest backbone network, and GBNET, built by China Jitong.
Only 5 percent of China’s population has access to the Internet, but user base growing rapidly
The growth of the Internet in China has been astounding. The first commercial Internet accounts were established in 1995 when MII and China Telecom set up the first commercial network, called ChinaNet. At that time, only 15,000 people were online. By January 2003, the number of Internet users in China reached 59.1 million, representing nearly 5 percent of China’s population of 1.3 billion, and making China the second largest home Internet population after the United States. The number of Internet users increased 75 percent since the beginning of 2002. Even taking into account the rapid growth of the Internet population in China, there remains a huge potential market for the remaining 95 percent of the population who still have not accessed the Internet.
The majority of Internet users (57 percent) accessed the Internet through a dial-up connection (Figure 3-9), followed by leased lines at 28 percent. The way people access the Internet is beginning to diversify in China. The number of users using leased lines increased over 200 percent since January 2002, while the number of dial-up users increased 91 percent in this same period.
Figure 3-9: Methods of
Internet access in China

Source:
CNNIC, January 2003
Although broadband access is still low (only 4 percent of the total Internet population), Strategy Analytics, a market research firm, predicts that nearly 37 million homes in China will use broadband by 2008, compared to the 2.9 million households in 2002 (Figure 3-10). The majority of broadband users will subscribe to digital subscriber loop (DSL) services. The market research firm, In-stat/MDR, predicts that China will lead the Asia-Pacific region in the number of broadband subscribers, reaching 30 to 40 million subscribers by 2006. The Chinese government has cited broadband development and deployment in the Tenth Five-Year Plan as one of the key drivers to encourage innovation and growth of the IT industry.
Figure 3-10: Residential
Broadband Households in China, 2001 - 2008

Source: Strategy Analytics, October 2002
PC desktops are still the main access device for Internet users, representing over 97 percent of Internet access devices. The number of hours spent online per week has decreased from an average of 17 hours since the beginning of 2002 to 10 hours by January 2003. The primary reason for accessing the Internet is still for information gathering. The most popular online services used include e-mail, search engines, software uploading and downloading, and chatting. Cheaper charges for Internet access along with faster connections to the Internet (increased broadband deployment) will be key drivers to the development of China’s Internet market.

Figure
3-11: Proportions of Main Internet Access Locations (in percent)
Source:
CNNIC, 2003
China’s regulation of Internet content has been widely monitored by the international business community with shutdowns of Internet cafes, censorship of websites that the government considers “harmful content,” and the temporary takedown of search engines such as Google in September 2002. According to a study on China’s Internet filtering practices conducted by Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, the Chinese government is blocking close to 10 percent of websites. China’s continual filtering of content on the Internet could hamper the innovation and entrepreneurial spirit that has helped grow the Internet economy throughout the world.
The Provisional Regulations for the Administration of Internet Publishing was issued by the State Press and Publications Administration and MII on June 27, 2002 and became effective August 1, 2002. According to the English-language China law publication, China Legal Change, "Internet publishing" is defined to mean “the online transmission acts by Internet information service providers of posting on the Internet, or sending to user terminals through the Internet, after selection and editing, works created by themselves or others for browsing, reading, use or downloading by the public”. The regulations also included provisions on the types of content that are prohibited on the Internet.
Government authorities’ attempts to regulate the Internet have been countered by hackers who use proxy servers as gateways to sites that have been blocked by the government. A Chinese Academy of Sciences study in 2000 revealed that 25 percent of China’s Internet users accessed blocked sites through proxy servers. Internet users have also used freeware, such as Safeweb’s Triangle Boy, that they can download for free and whose technology can trick the government’s electronic filters.
In March 2002, approximately 300 enterprises signed China’s first Internet self-discipline pledge, called the “Public Pledge on Self-discipline for China Internet Industry.” The main purposes of the pledge are to promote Internet use, prevent cyber crime, encourage healthy industry competition, and prevent intellectual property rights violations. The pledge does, however, include language supporting the Chinese government’s censorship of the Internet. For example, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are responsible for removing harmful content on websites they host. Signatories to the pledge must remove harmful content from their website(s) or be removed from the group.
Among the most popular Internet Content Providers (ICPs) are sohu.com, sina.com, and 163.com. The range of Chinese language content available on “.cn” websites is limited due to the government’s control of content, and ISPs’ and ICPs’ liability for this content. As a result, the demand for uncensored Chinese language content is high, and many Internet users in China access Chinese language websites that originate outside of the Chinese government’s control. Some portals have Chinese language sites that can be accessed from their U.S. server.
According to China’s regulations, ISPs are categorized as providing value-added services. Wholly owned foreign ISPs are not permitted in China. Most foreign companies can only access China’s Internet market through joint ventures with a local partner. For example, in June 2001, AOL-Time Warner signed a $200 million joint venture with China's major PC producer, the Legend Computer Group. Each party contributed $100 million to set up a new company that provides interactive services to Chinese consumers through Legend's FM365.com portal site. Up until now, AOL-Time Warner has mainly contributed technical and consulting services for this site. In early 2003, AOL-Time Warner and the Legend Group announced that they will put this deal on hold to review to develop a viable business model post-WTO. China permits private companies to operate ISPs, although ultimately all bandwidth is leased from licensed Internet gateways. Competition in the ISP market is fierce with narrow profit margins. Internet access charges to consumers are relatively low compared to operating costs.
Prior to China’s accession to the WTO, foreign companies could not participate in China’s Internet market. As part of China’s accession package, foreign companies can apply for a value-added services license through a joint venture with a Chinese partner. China defines value-added services as telecom and information services that are delivered via the fixed-line network, mobile phone network, and Internet and other data transmission networks. Upon accession, foreign firms were allowed a 30 percent stake in a joint venture that is licensed to operate in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. In 2002, the foreign company’s equity stake could increase to 49 percent and the geographical easing of restrictions was expanded to 14 major cities in China[24] in addition to the above cities. By 2003, equity can increase to 50 percent and the remaining restrictions on other geographic areas will be completely lifted. For more details, see Chapter 2 on Telecommunications.
CHAPTER
4: ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
With a population of 1.3
billion, China may have the greatest potential of all Asia/Pacific countries to
experience exponential growth in its e-commerce sector. In recent years, China has witnessed a
dramatic increase in its population’s use of the Internet. According to the China Internet Network Information
Center (CNNIC), in January 2003, there were 59 million Internet users in China,
a growth of nearly 73 percent since June 2001.[25] In addition, E-businesses in China are
multiplying almost as fast as Internet users.
An estimated 78 percent of all Chinese websites are now operated by
“enterprises” and 5 percent are operated by “businesses”.[26]
Despite these
developments, only 34 percent of Internet users in China are currently
purchasing goods and services on-line.[27] Moreover, only 11 percent of Chinese
“enterprise” websites and 45 percent of Chinese “business” websites offer “e-commerce
services”.[28]
There are several reasons
why Chinese consumers and businesses are not yet buying online in large
numbers. The use of credit payment
systems is not widespread in China; online merchants are not yet fully trusted;
security of electronic payments cannot be guaranteed; and inefficient delivery
systems prevail in most of the country.
Moreover, China has yet to develop a legal framework conducive to the
rapid growth of e-commerce in the country.
Laws recognizing the validity of “e-contracting” tools such as
electronic signatures and authentication technology, as well as the importance
of online security, have been proposed, but not fully implemented.
As a result of these
factors, neither the Business-to-Consumer (B2C) nor the Business-to-Business
(B2B) e-commerce sectors in China have been able to reach their full potential.
Nevertheless, despite the challenges faced by China’s e-commerce sector, there
is reason to be optimistic. While other
countries have experienced a marked decline in the growth of e-commerce due to
the recent global economic downturn, some observers have estimated that China’s
e-commerce sector (B2B and B2C) is expected to grow from $15.6 billion (2002)
to $98.8 billion in 2006.[29]
Furthermore, the central government has stepped up its national “informatization” campaign and is continuing its work on developing a legal framework for e-commerce. These steps should encourage more Chinese businesses and consumers, as well as the government itself, to go online. Finally, China’s recent accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) should result in greater foreign competition and investment in China’s e-commerce market, thereby spurring the development and introduction of more efficient mechanisms for online payment, delivery and Internet security.
Business –To-
Business Electronic Commerce
While B2B e-commerce in
China remains small in comparison to other countries, there is evidence that
the market continues to expand. In
2000, it was estimated that there were an estimated 370 B2B websites in
operation in China and that the size of the B2B market was approximately $9
billion.[30] In addition, 16 percent of all “business”
websites and 5 percent of all “enterprise” websites in China now offer B2B
e-commerce services.[31] Since some observers are now predicting that
B2B will account for 88 percent of all global online sales in 2006,[32]
it is likely that the B2B market in China will follow this trend. In fact,
recent studies indicate that the Chinese B2B market will continue to expand
rapidly, perhaps totaling as much as $22 billion by 2006.[33]
While many organizations,
including state enterprises and joint ventures, have begun to implement B2B
strategies, the vast potential for B2B e-commerce in China has not yet been realized. The current B2B market in China is
exemplified by a small number of innovative firms that have begun to supply
e-business infrastructure products and solutions as an extension of their
normal operations. One such company is
Digital China, a division of Legend Holdings Limited, China’s largest
manufacturer of personal computers.
Digital China has recently developed China’s largest B2B
web-platform. Digital China’s B2B activities
have enabled the company to become one of the largest information technology
distributors in the Asia/Pacific region and the company estimates that it will
reach sales revenue of $4 billion by
2005.[34]
Another example of B2B
success in China is the China National Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs
Corporation (COFCO), a distributor of various food products that has recently
teamed with several U.S. firms, including Archer Daniels Midland Company, on an
e-commerce platform, foodchina.com. The
company is also currently developing an e-procurement system, with the
assistance of IBM. COFCO expects that
its online B2B systems will better facilitate trade between the company, its
suppliers, and customers.[35]
However, while the
potential remains high for B2B in China, there are a number of factors
inhibiting further growth in the sector.
Perhaps the greatest obstacle to the development of e-commerce in China
is the country’s traditional “cash and carry” culture and the lack of online
payment use. While the use of bank
debit cards has increased significantly in recent years, few businesses (or
consumers) utilize credit cards, thereby inhibiting the efficient payment of
B2B goods and services (See Figure 4-1).

Source:
CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the Development of China’s Internet (January 2003), http://www.cnnic.net.en/develst/repindex-e.shtml
In addition, China lacks
a postal/package delivery network suited for large-scale e-commerce. The
national postal system, ChinaPost, has a reputation for slow service and
express delivery companies are still in short supply and limited to the main
urban centers (See Figure 4-2).
Furthermore, Chinese businesses (as well as consumers) continue to
express a lack of confidence in the overall security of doing business online,
an issue that the central government has only recently begun to address. Nevertheless, as China responds to the
traditional and legal challenges posed by the growth of e-commerce, it is
expected that B2B will enjoy increased acceptance in the country.

Source:
CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the
Development of China’s Internet
(January 2003), http://www.cnnic.net.en/develst/repindex-e.shtml
Business –To-
Consumer Electronic Commerce
As previously noted,
while recent surveys indicate that an increasing number of Chinese are using
the Internet, only a small number of the country’s consumers are actually
purchasing good and services online. In
addition, the CNNIC has estimated that only 18 percent of Chinese “business”
websites and 6 percent of all “enterprise” websites are providing B2C
e-commerce services.[36] Nevertheless, while the B2C market may
appear comparatively small in China, the sheer size of the potential B2C market
in the country warrants the attention of online merchants.
Despite the relative size
of the current B2C market in China, there are indications that an increasing
number of Chinese, particularly those in the large cities of Beijing, Shanghai,
and Guangzhou, are beginning to favor e-commerce over traditional methods of
purchasing goods and services.[37] Chinese consumers are increasingly going
online to purchase books and magazines, computer equipment, mobile phones, and
to a lesser extent, medical and financial services.[38] In addition, the development of B2C Internet
portals, such as Sohu.com and Sina.com, are making e-commerce more convenient
and efficient than ever for consumers.
As is the case with B2B
e-commerce, several factors have conspired to hamper current development of the
B2C market in China. In particular,
Chinese consumers have indicated several obstacles to online purchase,
including security concerns, inconvenience of payment, late delivery, and
unreliability of the merchant (See Figure 4-3). However, an increasing number
of Chinese consumers appear to recognize the benefits of e-commerce, including
reduced cost, efficiency and the enjoyment and curiosity of shopping online.[39] As the use of the Internet continues to
increase, and as businesses in China continue to respond to changing consumer
habits, B2C e-commerce will likely become more prevalent in the country.

Source: CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the
Development of China’s Internet (January 2003),
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/develst/2002-7e/index.shtml
Financial Services
In recent years, China’s
banking and security brokerage communities have begun to realize the value of
the Internet. Commercial banks and securities firms in China are now providing
their customers with an increasing variety of online services, including electronic
inter-bank transfers, online account inquiries, and Internet shopping
options. However, while the application
of e-commerce to the financial services sector holds great promise, online
banking and brokerage services in China are currently focused almost
exclusively on the B2B market.
In late 2001, China’s
central bank, the People’s Bank of China, issued regulations governing online
banking activities. These regulations
are intended to provide certain assurances to banks that would like to provide
Internet banking services, but are hesitant because of concerns related to the
security of their customers’ data.[40] The regulations require banks to install
certain security and encryption technologies, and to inform customers of the
potential trading risks. Banks that comply with the regulations receive a
certificate from the central bank in Beijing.
While the regulations
provide a certain degree of assurance for banks and their relations with their
business clients, a personal data protection law may be required before
Internet banking in China is extended to personal banking.[41] The lack of Internet security for personal
banking is one reason why online banking in China is limited to enterprises.[42] Additional obstacles inherent in the
Chinese market also prevent consumers from utilizing online banking. These include the infrequent availability of
e-payment solutions, the inability of banks to conduct credit analyses on their
customers, and limited telephone and Internet links in some areas of the
country.[43]
These factors appear to
have conspired to limit opportunities in China’s online securities sector as
well. While an estimated $5.13 billion
in shares were traded online during the first two months of 2002 in China,[44]
that figure accounts for only 6 percent of all shares traded at China’s two
stock exchanges.[45]
Nevertheless, all
indications are that China will continue to experience growth in both its
Internet banking and online brokerage sectors.
As China seeks to overcome traditional barriers to doing business
online, and as the central government further develops its legal framework for
e-commerce, more Chinese businesses and consumers are increasingly likely to
apply Internet solutions to their financial transactions.
Furthermore, pursuant to
its WTO accession, China has agreed to significant liberalizations and
reductions of market restrictions in a number of service sectors, including
banking. As China continues its reforms
in this regard, it will establish a more transparent and predictable regime for
business dealings,[46]
which should particularly benefit the application of the Internet to the
financial services sector, and expand foreign opportunities in China’s
e-commerce market.
Electronic Learning
While Chinese consumers,
in general, have refrained from purchasing goods and services online, Chinese
students are widely engaging in online education services, or
“e-learning.” Computer and
television-hosted distance education networks are expanding rapidly to China’s
remote regions and at least 40 Chinese universities are now providing online
education. In fact, it is estimated that 5 million college students in China
will use online education services by 2005.[47]
There are two main
reasons why e-learning has become so popular in China. First, the State Council and Ministry of
Education have placed great emphasis on online education, particularly at the
college and university level. In 2000,
the Ministry of Education authorized 31 universities to provide online
education and began to train teachers to produce Internet courses and online
textbooks. Secondly, Chinese parents
have always placed a premium on education and have had a great willingness to
pay for online courses for their children and to purchase the required computer
equipment.[48]
In addition to distance
learning services, Chinese universities are incorporating Internet tools into
their classrooms and have begun to focus on e-commerce studies within their
curricula. For example, Xi’an Jiaotong
University in Shaanxi province has enabled its students to complete assignments
through e-mail, chat-groups, Internet classrooms, and a digital library. The school also offers courses in e-business
and Internet law and has sponsored national e-commerce seminars that have drawn
participants from across the country.[49]
While e-learning has
gained in popularity in China, there are a number of factors currently
inhibiting its further growth. Many
Chinese schools, including colleges and universities, lack appropriate
facilities for conducting online education and suffer from faculty that have
not been trained to provide online instruction. In addition, few students in
China have broadband access and the cost of accessing the Internet is simply
too high for some students, particularly those in rural areas.[50] However, as the central government and
provincial authorities continue to dedicate resources to online education and
expand the country’s Internet infrastructure, e-learning opportunities will
likely expand for Chinese students.
Legal, Regulatory
AND Policy Framework for Electronic Commerce
In recent years, China’s
central government has instituted a nationwide “informatization” campaign aimed
at developing the nation’s IT infrastructure and encouraging consumers,
businesses and the government itself to go online. As part of its overall strategy, Beijing has enacted a series of
laws and regulations designed to address legal issues specific to e-commerce
and to stimulate its growth in the country.
However, while China has addressed some legal issues brought on by the
growth of e-commerce issues, it currently lacks a national framework
comprehensive enough to many aspects of e-commerce.
While the theme of
“informatization” is ubiquitous in China, there is no clear delineation of
responsibilities for e-commerce policy in the country. The State Council has
recently created an Informatization Office that has been tasked with the
overall responsibility of China’s e-commerce and e-government policies.
However, there are a number of additional agencies participating in that work,
including the Ministry of Commerce, the State Development and Planning
Committee (SDPC), the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), the Ministry
of Information Industry (MII), the Ministry of Finance (MOF), and the Party’s Propaganda
Department.
In addition, provincial
and local governments have initiated their own “informatization” and e-commerce
programs. The regions encompassing Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou have been
particularly active in encouraging development in e-commerce and in enacting
local policies/regulations to address key legal issues.[51]
Central and/or local government authorities have instituted (or are developing) legal, regulatory and policy initiatives in the following key areas:
E-Government:
In 1999, China introduced
its “Government Online” program that was aimed at making central and local
government information and services accessible via the Internet. Subsequent initiatives have been focused on
encouraging schools to go online and offering businesses and consumers the
ability to obtain licenses and permits from various authorities, as well as pay
taxes, electronically.
Recent studies indicate
that China’s efforts to institute e-government have been largely
successful. In 2001, it was estimated
that over 3,300 websites in China use the “.gov.cn” domain name.[52] In addition, local governments have made
considerable progress in applying information technologies to their
programs. For example, Shanghai has
created “Portal Shanghai” a web platform that links government regulations and
information from across the region. The
city has also begun to issue “smart cards” to its citizens for use in public
transportation and for social security purposes.[53]
Additionally, provincial
governments have begun to sponsor e-government workshops. In June 2002, Sichuan province sponsored one
such workshop in Chengdu. Several U.S.
companies, including IBM, participated in the program.
Digital Divide:
Guangdong province,
Beijing, and Shanghai account for over 30 percent of China’s total online user
population, while Qinghai, Ningxia, and Tibet collectively account for less
than 1 percent.[54] In addition, over 40 percent of all domain
names in the country have been allocated to websites in China’s three largest
cities.[55]
As China moves forward with its
“informatization” program and accelerates the growth of e-commerce, it
must also find a way to bridge the digital divide that exists between the major
urban centers and outlying provinces.
Central government
programs have been limited in this regard, but China has recently instituted a
“Go West” campaign, part of which encourages e-businesses to relocate to
western provinces, including Shaanxi and Sichuan. Thus, as government and enterprises build further awareness of
the Internet in rural areas, the digital divide in the country will likely
diminish.
Certification Programs for Enterprises Engaged in
E-Commerce:
In 1999, China introduced
its “Enterprises Go Online” program to encourage Chinese businesses to utilize
the Internet and to engage in e-commerce.
Thus far, the program has proven a modest success. As previously mentioned, 77 percent of
Chinese websites are now operated by businesses.[56]
In order to help more
enterprises to go online, MII has introduced a pilot certification program for
businesses that wish to engage in e-commerce.
While the overall objectives and requirements of the program remain
unclear, MII has indicated that the program is intended to improve efficiency,
competition and capability in China’s e-commerce sector by offering
participants training in e-business techniques and tools.[57] The program has recently been extended to
several outlying provinces, including Shaanxi.[58]
Electronic Payments:
As mentioned, one of the
greatest obstacles to the more rapid growth of e-commerce in China is the fact
that online payment mechanisms are not widely developed or used in the country.
For instance, while Visa and MasterCard have distributed credit cards in
conjunction with several Chinese banks, including the Bank of Communications,
credit cards have not gained widespread acceptance. In addition, while bank-issued debit cards are increasingly
favored by Chinese, they still constitute a low percentage of all modes of
payment used in the country. For most
businesses and consumers in China, “cash and carry” is still the preferred
means of purchasing goods and services.
One reason why e-payment
instruments are not widely used in China is that the central government has
insisted on conducting numerous studies on e-payment mechanisms before it
decides to implement a national financial network that would encourage the use
of efficient payment mechanisms or instruments, including credit cards. In addition, very few banks currently have
the ability to conduct credit analyses.
Finally, the government has yet to completely address information
security, an issue that concerns Chinese consumers and businesses and
contributes to a diminished demand for online payment solutions.
Digital Signatures:
In June 2002, the
predecessor to the Ministry of Commerce, the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation (MOFTEC), announced
that it intended to appoint experts to draft a comprehensive Electronic
Signature Regulation for China. The law
would provide legal effect for digital signatures, electronic tools that can be
used as evidence of a document’s transmission as well as verification of the
authenticity of the document’s sender.
The law would also
address a major shortcoming of China’s legal treatment of e-commerce. Chinese law currently does not recognize the
validity of digital signatures and similar authentication technology. While
many details of the proposed legislation have not been released, a comprehensive,
balanced and “technology-neutral” digital signature law might further assist
the development of China’s Internet economy, particularly in the country’s
financial services sector.
Information Security:
In September 2000, the
central government enacted an Internet security law aimed at guaranteeing
information security in the telecom and e-commerce sectors. The law sets forth basic principles for
enterprises and the government concerning Internet and telecom security. However, the law stops short of imposing
civil and criminal penalties for most cyber-security violations. Chinese
officials have indicated that enforcement of the law has been inconsistent and
that it is often difficult for authorities to find evidence against
cyber-criminals.[59] The problem is compounded by the fact that
the law has not yet been implemented in all of the country.
Data Privacy Protection:
China has yet to enact
legislation that would provide the country’s Internet users with any measurable
degree of personal data protection. In
December 2002, China released details of its first draft civil code, which
emphasizes the protection of privacy rights.[60] The draft code defines privacy “as private
information, activities and space” and bans people “from infringing on other’s
privacy by watching them, tapping their phones or disclosing their personal
information.”[61]
Nevertheless, it remains unclear how this code will be applied to personal data
exchanged online; whether China is willing to enforce the code against
organizations that violate an individual’s right to privacy; and if the code is
intended to apply to data collected by Chinese authorities as well as private
organizations.
In addition to its work
on the draft civil code, China has implemented information security and data
protection training for enterprises via the government’s pilot e-commerce
certification program. However, it is not yet clear whether this program can
offer any real assurances to Chinese Internet users that have hesitated from
going online due to Internet security or personal data protection concerns.
Content Restrictions:
In recent years, Chinese
authorities have responded to the increasing popularity of the Internet by
enacting a series of measures ostensibly to bolster Internet security in the
country to prevent cyber-crime. However, many of these initiatives have also
been chiefly designed to restrict the ability of users’ to view online content
that the government deems “harmful.”
In July 2002, MII
published the Measures for the Administration of Internet Access Facilities,
the central government’s latest attempt to restrict the activities of the many
licensed and unlicensed Internet cafes in the country. In particular, the new law requires the
operators of Internet service facilities to record information on Internet
access and to provide those records to authorities upon request. Authorities
have also begun a more concerted effort to shut down Internet cafes that state
security believes are allowing access to “subversive” websites, including those
affiliated with the banned Falun Gong religious movement, pornography, and
democracy movements inside and outside the country.[62]
Intellectual Property Rights Protection:
Before the U.S. and China
signed a series of bilateral intellectual property rights (IPR) agreements in
the 1990s, China was widely considered to be one of the world’s largest
exporters of pirated goods. The problem
was so rampant in China that many foreign companies were unable (or unwilling)
to enter China’s e-commerce market for fear that their products, including
digitally delivered software, would be copied and illegally produced.
In recent years, the
situation has improved somewhat. In
2001, China amended its Copyright Law and extended IPR protections for works
published and distributed via the Internet, thereby providing some measure of
assurance for rights-holders.
Additionally, many
consider China’s accession to the WTO as another positive step towards
addressing IPR violations in the country. Full implementation of the TRIPS
agreement, required upon accession, will likely enhance IPR protection for
high-tech goods, including digitally delivered products. Nevertheless, despite these positive steps
towards meaningful IPR protection in China, it is believed that the real proof
of China’s progress in this area will lie in the central government’s
willingness to prosecute those who violate the laws through enhanced
enforcement activities.
Taxation of E-Commerce:
In July 2000, the central
government appointed a task force to look into the possibility of imposing
taxes on electronic transactions in an effort to boost the government’s
finances. At the time, China’s chief
tax official had indicated that tax exemptions for e-commerce were draining
potential revenue from the country.[63] However, despite that announcement, China
has refrained from imposing duties on e-commerce. China will likely continue
this policy, at least in the short term, while its “informatization” efforts
proceed and while it seeks to implement WTO-compatible laws and trade practices.[64]
Bilateral and
Multilateral Cooperation
In recent years, China
has become more involved in bilateral and multilateral policy initiatives
concerning electronic commerce. This
increased willingness to cooperate globally on e-commerce issues is somewhat
reflective of its overall strategy of increased openness and transparency
concerning its trade laws and economic policies. This is particularly the case as China implements its WTO
accession commitments and seeks to further promote foreign investment.
To date, China’s
involvement in multilateral e-commerce discussions has been led by the Ministry
of Commerce (formerly MOFTEC). In
particular, the Ministry of Commerce has represented China’s interests on
e-commerce issues in the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) E-Commerce
Steering Group (ECSG). In 2001-2002,
China served as co-chair of the ECSG with Canada.
In recent years, China
has shepherded two major initiatives in the ECSG:
·
In August 2001 in
Dalian, China, the Chinese delegation submitted a proposal to form the
E-Commerce Business Alliance (ECBA), which would provide APEC with a business
community forum exclusively devoted to the exchange of views on issues related
to e-commerce. ECBA was approved by the
ECSG in August 2002 in Acapulco, Mexico, and the first official meeting is
scheduled for April 22-24, 2003 in Yantai, China.
·
The Chinese also
proposed the Action Plan on Economic and Technical Cooperation in the Field of
E-Commerce (ECOTECH) in August 2001. A modified version of this proposal,
emphasizing future work on international harmonization of e-commerce statistics
and online payments issues was accepted by the ECSG at the August 2002 meeting.
Additional ECSG work
items may prove useful areas for cooperation between China and other
nations. The ECSG Privacy Forum, held
in February 2002, inspired a work plan on data privacy protection, including a
survey of APEC laws and policies related to online privacy. The 2002 forum was
followed by an APEC privacy workshop in Thailand in February 2003. Since APEC’s
work on data privacy protection is a large undertaking, China’s involvement in
the project would prove instrumental.[65]
In addition, in recent
years, the U.S. Department of Commerce has participated with China in
E-Commerce summits in 2000 and 2001.
These were sponsored by MII and the China Electronic Commerce
Association and provided valuable opportunities to further U.S.-China dialogue
on a number of key e-commerce topics, including taxation, Internet security and
IPR.
Finally, in March 2002,
the U.S. Department of Commerce and China’s State Council Informatization
Office sponsored a joint roundtable on e-commerce in Washington, D.C., which
featured U.S. and Chinese industry and government representatives. Issues discussed included telecom
infrastructure, network security, verification, and intellectual property
rights protection. Further U.S.-China
roundtables on e-commerce may occur.
U.S. exporters may find substantial market opportunities in China, but they will face tremendous challenges as well. While U.S. information and communications technology (ICT) products are generally well regarded in China, U.S. firms must compete with the best that the rest of the world has to offer. European, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, and Canadian companies are all vying for a piece of the China market, along with local Chinese manufacturers. Local firms benefit from a variety of Chinese government policies that are designed to foster the development of an indigenous ICT industry. As previously noted, China’s accession to the WTO has helped to reduce or eliminate many of the market access barriers faced by U.S. exporters to China, but significant hurdles still remain.
It is easy to look at China’s population of 1.3 billion people and assume that there will be a commensurate demand for ICT products and services. But approximately 800 million people in China are farmers and peasants, unable to afford many of these new technologies. China is still a developing country, and much of the country’s wealth is concentrated in the coastal provinces.
Opportunities in Telecommunications
China’s telecommunications equipment market is highly competitive, but opportunities do exist for new players. The country’s “Go West” Initiative places a premium on bringing telecommunications service to the under-served western provinces. There is also a strong demand for cost-effective solutions for rural applications.
The recent split of China Telecom into two enterprises, China Telecom and China Netcom, should create new opportunities for vendors of “last-mile” solutions. Both firms were granted a share of the nationwide fiber-optic backbone network, but China Telecom retained the local loop infrastructure in the southern part of China, while China Netcom was awarded the local loop infrastructure in the north. Each company is now looking for ways to connect to customers in their competitor’s territory. There are a variety of wireless applications, such as new 802.16 technologies, that would appear to meet this need.
China Telecom and China Netcom are also expected to aggressively market mobile services as soon as they are granted licenses by MII. The exact timing for the granting of such licenses is the subject of much speculation and conflicting reports from MII officials. It appears that MII will issue four 3G licenses in late 2003 or 2004 and that these licenses will go to the two existing mobile carriers, China Mobile and China Unicom, and to China Telecom and China Netcom. In the meantime, China Mobile and China Unicom have been aggressively deploying their “xiaolingtong” wireless networks, which offer limited mobility within a specific municipal area and are considered extensions of fixed line service.
The build-out of 3G networks will offer opportunities not only for equipment vendors, but also for companies offering a wide range of associated software applications, including roaming, billing, and user applications software.
China’s accession to the WTO has opened new opportunities for foreign suppliers to invest in China’s telecommunications services market, which had previously been closed to foreign participation. However, China divided its telecom services market into four sectors and agreed to open each sector in a series of steps that will permit foreign investment levels and service areas to increase over time. See “Chapter 2: Telecommunications” for further details.
As of January 2003, foreign companies may hold up to a 49 percent share in a joint venture offering value-added or paging services and/or up to a 35 percent share of a joint venture offering mobile services in any or all of 17 designated cities in China. Foreign investment in basic services will not be permitted until 2005. Because foreign investment limits are capped at 50 percent for value-added and paging services and 49 percent for mobile and basic services, there has been limited foreign investor interest in the China market thus far. Value-added services, which offer the highest investment limit and the fastest market-opening schedule, have attracted the most interest from foreign firms to date.
Four key factors are opening significant opportunities for U.S. IT suppliers to take advantage of China’s vast consumer market. These are: (1) the government’s informatization drive as stated in its Tenth Five-Year Plan to spread the use of information technologies among China’s traditional industries; (2) the “Go West” campaign to narrow the digital gap between Eastern and Western China; (3) China’s accession to the WTO; and (4) the focus of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games’ organizing committee on high-tech applications.
The government recognizes IT as a driver for economic growth and has placed tremendous emphasis on encouraging communities, the government, and traditional industries to use more information technologies. This priority is clearly stated in the Chinese Tenth Five-Year Plan (2001-2005).
According to IDC, China is expected to show the greatest growth in e-government spending among several Asian economies, including Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia. China’s e-government spending is growing nearly 40 percent annually between 2001 and 2003. This rapid increase in spending provides U.S. IT hardware and software suppliers with the opportunity to introduce solutions that will help the national, provincial, and municipal governments provide online services to their citizens. These solutions include networking hardware and software, Chinese language database software, Chinese language content management tools, portal software, and network security solutions.
China’s membership in the WTO offers new business prospects to U.S. IT firms. Traditional industries, such as manufacturing and banking, will need to upgrade their systems to become competitive internationally as China opens its market by joining the WTO. For example, a recent study by the consulting/research firm, Celent Communications, determined that China's banking industry invested nearly $5 billion in information technologies in 2001, and projected that ICT spending would rise each year to nearly $11 billion in 2005. Other industries, especially manufacturing, will require solutions, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), and supply chain management (SCM), to become more efficient in delivering products to their customers and receiving inputs from their suppliers. Not only will U.S. IT companies benefit from tariff reductions and equal treatment with domestic producers, but Chinese companies across all industries will also now have access to the 142 other WTO members’ markets. This means that many of these companies will need to evaluate trends in their respective industries and better understand how their rivals are leveraging new technologies to remain competitive and succeed both domestically and internationally.
U.S. IT services companies that have significant international experience and specialize in technology solutions for vertical industries can provide these companies valuable guidance. Gartner Dataquest predicts that China will become the world's second-fastest growing market for IT services in 2003. China’s IT services market is expected to reach nearly $5 billion this year, representing an increase of 19 percent from 2002. By 2006, IT services revenues could reach nearly $9 billion. In addition to targeting China’s traditional industries, IT consulting companies and systems integrators can also play a crucial role in assisting state-owned enterprises increase their competitiveness by selecting the right combination of equipment and software solutions. The privatization and reform of state-owned enterprises is another goal stated by the government in the Tenth Five-Year Plan.
“Go West” Initiative to narrow the gap between Eastern
and Western China
The Chinese government has targeted narrowing the income and digital gap between the wealthier Eastern cities and mostly agrarian Western provinces through its “Go West” initiative. The Ministry of Science and Technology will invest $24 million to help close this gap. This funding will be devoted to a variety of programs in which U.S. IT suppliers could participate. This includes educating communities, local governments, and businesses about the various uses of information technologies and training citizens on how to use computers and the Internet. U.S. IT solutions providers with training programs on the use of their technologies can leverage these types of initiatives and introduce their products and services to Western China. In addition, because of the large rural economy in the West, Chinese language software targeted for the agricultural sector and software that would help farmers more efficiently distribute their products throughout China could improve local economies.
China has more than 54 million Internet users and nearly 21 million computers connected to the Internet. This brings opportunities for Internet Content Providers to develop Chinese language content to increase the use of the Internet among China’s enormous population. Although China does have certain content restrictions (see “Chapter 3: Information Technology”), many opportunities still remain for Chinese language content developed for educational purposes in schools and hospitals. As more citizens gain access to computers and the Internet in the West, they will be able to benefit from the same content taught in educational institutes and consultations in hospitals in Eastern China and throughout the world.
China’s successful bid for the 2008 Beijing Olympics will offer opportunities for U.S. IT equipment and software companies to help provide services for the Games. Part of the Beijing Informatization Office’s “Digital Beijing” initiative is the proposal to have a Digital Olympics. The Digital Olympic project includes three main components:
(1) areas directly serving the Olympic Games - The Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games (BOCOG) and the official Olympic Committee will directly manage these types of projects. For example, this group will handle the systems integration contracts for the entire Games;
(2) applications, including all information services for use by visitors and athletes; and
(3) the supporting platform for Beijing’s infrastructure to promote informatization. The Beijing Informatization Office manages the second and third components of the Digital Olympics project. According to this office, their greatest challenge will be identifying key applications that athletes and visitors will use, rather than building the information infrastructure to support these applications.
Table 5-1 highlights some of the IT projects envisioned by the municipal government of Beijing. These projects provide a wide variety of opportunities for U.S. IT companies that can provide smart card technologies, broadband applications, database applications, e-commerce platforms, network security solutions, simulation software, games software relating to Olympic Game sports, and voice recognition software, among many other products and services. More information about the Beijing Olympics can be found on the official website at http://www.Beijing-2008.org.
|
Table 5-1: The 16 areas of work specified by
Beijing Informatization Office for the 2008 Digital Olympics |
|
1.
Plan and build a symbolic building or group of office buildings (for instance, “Olympic 2008 Plaza” or
Olympic 2008 Control Center, equipped with broadband network, command system,
and dispatching system); 2.
Plan and build Olympic-related basic telecom pipelines to ensure
deployment of all telecom networks for the Olympic Games; 3.
Tighten control over radio communications resources to ensure the
frequency allocation for, and normal operation of, all radio communication
equipment; 4.
Build up an advanced telecom infrastructure and provide world class
telecom services; 5.
Transform the analog television system to digital television system
so as to be able to provide digital television programs and other related
value-added services; 6.
Develop information systems required by the Olympic Games; 7.
Build up and improve the supporting environment for e-commerce to
meet the business demands during the Olympic Games; 8.
Make sure that all the stadiums and facilities meet the International
Olympic Committee’s requirements and improve the intelligence level of all
related facilities; 9.
Build up a project management information system to improve project
management in relation to the Olympic Games; 10.
Build a multi-language intelligent network so that there will be no
“language barriers” during the Olympic Games; 11.
Promote the use of IC cards and credit cards during the Olympic
Games; issue “2008 Beijing Olympic Games Cards”; 12.
Highlight “Digital Olympics” at the opening and closing ceremonies; 13.
Build up an information security system to ensure the security of all
Olympic Games-related networks and information, and provide information and
technological support to the overall security effort during the Olympic
Games; 14.
Speed up the construction of the urban information system so as to
create a better urban
information and telecom infrastructure, which will support the Olympic Games; 15.
Develop key information technologies related to the Olympic Games (for instance, simulation training
system, games, etc.), and eventually
lead to the emergence of a sports information industry; 16. Build up an integrated, effective, multimedia, and visualized decision-making and commanding information system to ensure the success of the Olympic Games 2008. |
|
Source:
Beijing Informatization Office (translation of text provided by the U.S.
Embassy in Beijing) |
As previously mentioned, several institutional and societal factors (such as low Internet penetration in rural areas, lack of credit card usage and inefficient delivery systems) have combined to restrain more rapid growth of e-commerce in China. However, while the B2B and B2C e-commerce markets in China remain relatively small, U.S. e-commerce companies should note the shear size and overall potential offered by the Chinese market.
China’s B2B market will likely continue to offer U.S. companies the greatest opportunity for export sales. An increasing number of Chinese firms are eager to implement Internet and e-commerce strategies and products, particularly e-procurement and e-sales technologies. U.S. web developers and web-hosting services, as well as e-commerce consultants, are also in high demand. E-commerce products and services localized for the Chinese market should enjoy the most success.
In general, the Chinese B2C e-commerce market will offer less opportunity than B2B. Until e-payment mechanisms, including credit cards, enjoy more usage in the country, the potential as compared with the B2B market will remain small. In addition, content restrictions (and site blocking) imposed by the Chinese government may continue to hamper the ability of U.S. companies to market certain goods, including books, periodicals, and music.
MARKET ENTRY STRATEGIES
U.S. firms interested in pursuing opportunities in China’s ICT markets should recognize the differences in business and cultural styles between the United States and China and develop an appropriate market entry strategy. An excellent place to start is with the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service’s publication, the China Country Commercial Guide (http://www.usatrade.gov/website/ForOffices.nsf/WebCCG/China).
As the following excerpt from the China Country Commercial Guide illustrates, it is extremely important that American companies carefully research their prospective opportunities in China before entering the market. “American companies continue to have mixed experiences in China. Some have been extremely profitable, while others have struggled. To be a success in China, American companies must thoroughly investigate the market, pre-qualify potential business partners, take steps to assure that they will be paid, and craft contracts which minimize misunderstandings between the parties.
“The problems of doing business in China can be grouped in four large categories:
IT industry experts
interviewed in China stress that for smaller U.S. firms, some form of local
representation is essential. Business in the country is very
relationship-oriented and “face-to-face” interactions are much more important
in China than in the United States. A local partner will give a U.S. firm a
local “face” and will use personal ties to locate and approach new customers
more effectively. Local representation will give small U.S. firms more
credibility, help U.S. SMEs overcome a lack of brand recognition, and make
potential customers more comfortable as well. Working through a local firm also
offers easier access to knowledge of the local market, such as sales cycles,
economic issues, regulatory issues, and cultural factors and tastes. According
to industry observers, there reportedly is wariness in China of foreign firms
that want to sell a product or service without a local presence. A local
presence shows customers that they will not need to call the United States if they
have problems or need technical or customer support. However, companies
planning to establish help desks in China should first ascertain that there is
sufficient local talent available to staff the operation and should take an
active role in properly training the staff.
What Form of Local Representation?
Firms with the necessary
financial resources and understanding of the Chinese market may wish to set up
a local office and hire local employees to do marketing, training, and provide
ongoing support for the company’s technologies. However, for most small
companies looking to enter the China market, the most popular option is to find
a local partner. One option is to
partner with a large, established IT supplier, systems integrator, or
consulting firm that is already active in China. Another is to partner with a
like-minded Chinese IT SME with complementary skills and technologies. Other options include agents, distributors,
or other representatives who can represent the U.S. firm and support its customers.
Local industry experts stress that prior to choosing a local presence strategy,
such as a partner or representative, it is important for the U.S. firm to visit
the target market and try to understand “firsthand” the local market and
business culture.
Small companies in the
international marketplace often lack the brand recognition and delivery
channels enjoyed by larger companies. Working with more established, larger foreign
IT and telecommunications firms, systems integrators, or consultants already
doing business in China can help a U.S. SME with its initial expansion into the
country. The larger companies are often able to integrate the smaller firm’s
technologies into their product or service suites, allowing the SME to reach
customers they might not otherwise be able to access. Many small firms enter the Chinese market because one of their
U.S. customers becomes active in China and asks the small firm to follow it to
China. Many Chinese IT suppliers,
systems integrators, and consultants are constantly looking for new
leading-edge technologies from small U.S. firms. See below.
Chinese SMEs in the IT
sector are eager for U.S. partners, and U.S. companies may want to consider
collaborating with small local firms with complementary products or
services. Many IT experts interviewed
in China recommend strategic alliances or partnerships as an effective way for
U.S. IT SMEs to penetrate the China market.
Depending on the culture and organizational goals of each company, an alliance could be
very formal, with
well-established responsibilities, or less formal, depending on each company’s
corporate culture and goals. Chinese IT firms seek partnerships with U.S. firms
for various reasons, including access to: 1) technologies necessary to execute
ideas; 2) trained and knowledgeable people; 3) training; and 4) perhaps most
importantly, additional financial resources.
Many Chinese SMEs have
ideas, but lack the hardware, software, and technical knowledge to create the
intended solution. In particular, small
local systems integrators and consultants desire to partner with similar U.S.
firms to provide services such as systems integration, and Internet and
e-commerce strategy consulting. Chinese start-ups know that being
first-to-market with the latest technologies is critical, and that the IT
industry’s rapid pace of technological development and short product life
cycles require partnering to obtain these technologies and expertise, instead
of trying to develop them “in-house.” Further, because U.S. firms have the
reputation of being at the forefront of these technologies, partnering with
U.S. IT SMEs provides Chinese IT firms with technological legitimacy.
U.S. partners are
desirable for their human resources as well.
Chinese firms in the industry report that finding talented management
and quality staff is a factor limiting the growth of local firms. Therefore, many Chinese companies are seeking
quality training in the technologies necessary for the partnership to succeed.
In many cases, Chinese companies may be more favorably inclined to purchase
equipment and services from foreign suppliers if training is included.
Agents and distributors,
another possible approach to local representation, can offer cost-effective
entry into new markets for U.S. IT firms. Like other partners, they can assist
the U.S. company with their knowledge of the intricacies of the target market,
such as regulations and taxes.
Agents and distributors differ slightly. Agents generally take orders for and sell a product or service, but do not take possession of a product and are not directly responsible for payment. In most countries, an agent has more than one client and, therefore, may sell products or services from companies that compete with each other. A distributor is typically responsible for the payment of a product that is exported. Distributors sometimes combine their own product with that of the U.S. exporter, which makes the distributor more committed to selling the exporter’s product.
Lists of agents and
distributors can usually be found in the appropriate Industry Sector Analysis
(ISA) reports published regularly by U.S. Department of Commerce’s foreign
trade specialists in China, although these lists may not always be current due
to the rapid rate of change in the industry.
Agents or distributors may also be located by searching advertisements
in specialized magazines in the target country, similar to industry journals in
the United States. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s U.S. and Foreign
Commercial Service can assist U.S. firms in locating agents and distributors in
China through its International Partner Search program.[67]
According to a report
issued by the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service office in Guangzhou, China,
in September 2002, the following four companies were the top ICT distributors
in China in 2001:[68]
Spun off from Legend Computer in 2000, Digital China went public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on June 1, 2001 (stock quote: 861HK). The company still maintains its operational headquarters in Beijing with distribution networks throughout China. According to their public financial statement, Digital China’s annual sales in 2001 reached $1.35 billion, accounting for an estimated 28 percent of the market share in ICT distribution. The company currently distributes AGFA, Alcatel, Cannon, Cisco, Compaq, EMC, Epson, HP, IBM, Kodak, Motorola, Netscreen, Nokia, Oracle, Sun, Toshiba.
Ingram Micro China, headquartered in Shanghai, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ingram Micro, the world’s largest ICT distributor. Ingram Micro China’s origin can be traced back to a local Chinese company named Even-Hi Computer. In 1993, Even-Hi became one of the two Intel distributors (the other is Legend, now Digital China) in China. With sales of Intel CPUs skyrocketing in China, Even-Hi grew rapidly and inevitably had to look for outside financing to support its expansion. They soon found Singapore Headquartered Electronics Resources (ER), then one of the major distributors in South East Asia. By 1997, ER had acquired all of Even-Hi’s shares and established ER China. In the same year Ingram Micro started discussion with ER Singapore to acquire the Singaporean firm. In January 1999, Ingram Micro completed its acquisition of ER, including ER China. Ingram Micro, through acquisition, suddenly became the second largest distributor in the China market, with 13 warehouses throughout the country and annual sales reaching an estimated $900 million. Mr. Fan Zhang, General Manger since the Even-Hi days, is still IM China’s chief executive today.
PCI was established in the southern city of Guangzhou in 1992. The company began as a small retailer and system integrator in a wholesale market located in this city. Mr. Wei Liu, founder and CEO, led the company to become one of the top distributors in the market. The company is ranked by IDC as the third largest ICT distributor in China with a 14 percent market share. In 2001, the company’s annual sales reached $430 million with a network of 8 offices and 11 warehouses across China. In December 2001, ECS Holding Ltd., a Singapore Stock Exchange-listed company, acquired 51 percent ownership in PCI. Solectron, the world’s largest contracted equipment manufacturer, with 19.3 percent ownership of ECS shares, became one the major shareholders of PCI. Solectron brings to PCI its long-standing business relationships with all the top ICT vendors and its renowned supply-chain management expertise. The company currently distributes the following brands: Adobe, APC, Apple, AutoCad, Autodesk, BEA, Cisco, Greatwall, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Sun, and Veritas.
In 1991, Mr. Li Wu founded the then-trading company, Dawncom Company, in the Northeastern city of Shenyang with an initial investment of about $60,000. Dawncom today is a Shenzhen Stock Exchange listed company (quote 0863) with annual sales of about $100 million in 2001. Dawncom’s line includes IBM, Microsoft, Compaq, HP, Huawei, Panduit, Nortel Networks, and Oracle.
Regardless of how agents
or distributors are found, it is important that they be qualified to ensure
they understand the U.S. firm’s product and can provide after-sales service, if
necessary. For SMEs with highly
sophisticated technologies, agents and distributors may not be the best market
entry option. After-sales service, which sometimes includes working closely
with the customer on technology issues, is critical in the IT industry and is a
function that may be best handled by the exporting firm or its local partner.
Develop Relationships – Personal relationships in business are critical. The Chinese feel more comfortable dealing with “old friends,” so it is important for exporters, importers, and investors to establish and maintain close relationships with their Chinese counterparts and relevant government agencies. It is equally important that American exporters encourage strong personal relationships between their Chinese agents or distributors and buyers and end-users. A web of strong personal relationships will help ensure smoother development of business in China.[69]
Be Patient – It generally takes more time to conduct business transactions in China than in the United States. The Chinese tend to take more time than Americans when making major decisions and such decisions usually must be approved by a consensus of several people, rather than a single decision-maker.
Protect your Intellectual Property Rights – IPR violations are a very serious concern in China, so U.S. firms should take precautions to utilize appropriate contractual and legal measures to protect their intellectual property.
Get to Know your Local Trade Associations and
Government Offices
There are a number of trade associations that may be useful to U.S. ICT firms doing business in China, including the United States Information Technology Office (USITO), the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham), and the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC).
There are also a number of Chinese government offices that oversee the activities of foreign firms in China so it is important for U.S. firms to develop a good working relationship with them.
Overviews of the trade associations and Chinese government agencies are included in Chapter 1. The names and addresses of contacts in these associations and government agencies can be found in the appendices of this report.
Trade shows provide a
good opportunity to learn more about China’s ICT market sectors. There are several national
telecommunications and information technology exhibitions each year, which
provide attendees a good overview of the various products and technologies
currently available in the China market.
Trade shows that focus on specific vertical industries are an excellent
avenue for SMEs that offer niche-market or vertical industry-specific products
or services. A partial list of key
trade shows is also available in the appendices of this report.
The U.S. Department of
Commerce organizes each year a variety of trade missions and matchmaker events
in China. U.S. Department of Commerce
personnel participate in many foreign trade fairs with, or on behalf of, U.S.
firms, offering companies market exposure at prices far below regular trade
fair participation costs. International
trade specialists in the Department manage trade missions and matchmakers.
These trade events can be an excellent avenue for SMEs to gain knowledge of a
foreign market, including making valuable business contacts in a very short
period of time. For a partial list of telecommunications, IT, and e-commerce
related trade fairs in China and elsewhere that are supported by the U.S.
Department of Commerce’s U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service, visit the
US&FCS Web site (http://www.usatrade.gov). The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Information
Technology Industries offices’ Web site (http://www.export.gov/infotech/) lists
IT- and telecom-related trade events.
CHAPTER 6: THE
ROLE OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The mission of the U.S. Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration (ITA) is "to create economic opportunity for U.S. workers and firms by promoting international trade, opening foreign markets, ensuring compliance with trade laws and agreements, and supporting U.S. commercial interests at home and abroad.” The Trade Development (TD) and the U.S. Commercial Service (US&FCS) divisions of ITA are responsible for export promotion. For more information on ITA, visit http://www.trade.gov. For more information on how the U.S. Government assists U.S. businesses export, visit http://www.export.gov.
Export.gov is a multi-agency trade portal that brings together U.S. Government export-related information under one easy-to-use web site, organized according to the intended needs of exporters, especially small businesses. Whether a company is exploring the possibility of exporting, searching for trade partners, seeking information on new markets, or dealing with trade problems, this web site can help. Additionally, the site has easy links to information on advocacy, trade events, trade statistics, tariffs and taxes, market research, export documentation, financing export transactions, and much more. For more information, visit the Web site at: http://www.export.gov.
TRADE DEVELOPMENT
ITA's Trade Development (TD) unit is the Commerce Department's link to U.S. industry. TD provides industry and market analysis, export promotion services, advocacy for U.S. companies bidding on foreign government contracts, and support for trade negotiations. TD offers an array of services to help small businesses increase their export potential.
TD's industry expertise encompasses the majority of U.S. business sectors. Industry sector specialists provide U.S. firms with: information and analysis of domestic and foreign industry trends; foreign market conditions and opportunities for specific products or services; information on foreign market tariffs and non-tariff barriers and regulations; advocacy assistance; business and cultural practices; and advice on business and cultural practices.
TD's industry expertise is the primary source used in trade negotiations by the President of the United States and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR). TD's close interaction with industry, understanding of restrictions on market access, product standards and testing requirements, and knowledge of trade data assist negotiators in the drafting of trade agreements with maximum benefits for U.S. firms. Additionally, TD industry experts help monitor and enforce foreign governments' compliance with trade commitments through collaboration with other ITA units, including the US&FCS and Market Access and Compliance (MAC) regional desk officers, as well as the USTR.
TD's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Technology Industries (ITI) oversees the activities of the three (3) high-tech industry-focused offices: the Office of Information Technologies and Electronic Commerce (OITEC); the Office of Telecommunications Technologies (OTT); and the Office of Microelectronics, Medical Equipment, and Instrumentation (OMMI).
OITEC focuses on numerous IT industry segments including but not limited to: computers and peripherals; software; networking equipment; and Internet and e-commerce technologies. The office conducts market research and provides general trade and policy analysis of the IT industry, including policy reviews of foreign countries' e-commerce laws and initiatives.
OITEC actively supports U.S. IT firms' efforts to expand their business overseas. Industry specialists track the growth and competitiveness of domestic and foreign IT industries; counsel U.S. businesses on overseas market conditions and the practical aspects of exporting their products; identify market barriers as they affect IT exports; and work closely with USTR to negotiate the removal of such barriers. The office’s export promotion activities include trade missions, trade fairs, catalog shows, and technical seminars that introduce U.S. businesses to end-users and potential trading partners located overseas.
OITEC also fosters a favorable policy environment by focusing on keeping both the
Internet and foreign markets open to private sector-driven global growth. OITEC participates in various fora such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC), the U.S.-Japan information technology working group under the Regulatory Reform Initiative, the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) negotiations, as well as bilateral free trade agreements with Australia, Chile, and Singapore. The office oversees the Administration's E-Commerce Joint Statements with other governments, manages the Industry Functional Advisory Committee (IFAC-4 ) on E-Commerce, and participates in formal as well as informal policy dialogues with other nations.
Industry specialists compile and disseminate detailed information and analyses on the IT industry sectors they cover, contribute to the Department of Commerce U.S. Industry & Trade Outlook publication that describes current and future IT industry and market trends on a domestic and global basis and prepare with other ITI offices ExportIT reports on key foreign markets. These specialists also work to update and expand the export.gov/infotech Web site with information on foreign markets and regulations, including tariff and tax rates for IT products, U.S. and foreign policies that affect IT exports, upcoming trade events, and additional government and private sector resources. The office also distributes a free electronic newsletter highlighting trade leads, partnering opportunities, and trade events.
To obtain more information, including a list of OITEC international trade specialists and the regions/industry sectors they cover, contact:
Office of Information Technologies and Electronic Commerce (OITEC)
U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2003
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
Tel: (202) 482-0216
FAX: (202) 482-5522
Internet: http://www.export.gov/infotech
OTT's mission is to support the growth and competitiveness of the U.S. telecommunications equipment and services industries in foreign markets.
OTT provides business counseling to U.S. telecommunications firms seeking to enter or expand in specific markets by developing and disseminating information on the telecommunications market in foreign countries based upon information from US&FCS and a wide range of other industry resources. The office promotes international trade and investment opportunities for the U.S. telecommunications industry by sponsoring events that offer direct contact with foreign government and industry officials. OTT, in conjunction with sister ITA units and government agencies, acts as an intermediary between U.S. firms and foreign governments to provide advocacy on behalf of U.S. companies bidding on public projects abroad. It supports the USTR in trade negotiations to open foreign markets for U.S. telecommunications equipment and services exports. Additionally, OTT monitors both bilateral and multilateral telecommunications agreements and provides input to the USTR regarding compliance by foreign countries.
OTT conducts market research and statistical analysis of the domestic and international telecommunications industry and posts a variety of industry information to the export.gov/infotech Web site. The office distributes complimentary electronic newsletters that deliver up-to-date information on foreign market opportunities and changes affecting the industry. OTT contributes the telecommunications chapters featured in the Department of Commerce U.S. Industry & Trade Outlook publication.
To obtain more information, including a list of OTT international trade specialists and the regions/industry sectors they cover, contact:
Office of Telecommunications Technologies (OTT)
U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4324
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
Tel: (202) 482-4466
FAX: (202) 482-5834
Internet: http://www.export.gov/infotech
Office of Microelectronics, Medical Equipment, and
Instrumentation (OMMI)
OMMI covers electronic components such as electron tubes, printed circuit boards, semiconductors, capacitors, resistors, transformers, and connectors, as well as semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Additionally, the office supports several industry sectors with high IT content, including medical and dental equipment and electronic medical apparatus, process control instruments, laboratory analytical instruments, optical instruments, and instruments used to measure electricity and electrical signals.
OMMI's primary mission is to promote exports and increase the international competitiveness of U.S. industry working in these sectors. It counsels U.S. firms on foreign market conditions and the specifics of exporting, using information from overseas US&FCS offices and a wide range of industry-related resources. OMMI staff work with private sector and Department of Commerce colleagues to develop trade missions, trade fairs, catalog shows, seminars, and other trade events that offer direct contact with foreign government officials, industry representatives, and end-users. In cooperation with other parts of ITA and U.S. government agencies, the office participates in trade negotiations and supports USTR efforts to eliminate or reduce regulatory and other types of barriers that hinder trade and investment in these industries.
OMMI staff gathers and disseminates market research and statistical analyses of the domestic and international microelectronics, medical equipment, and instrumentation industries. Trade and industry reports, trade statistics, information on foreign markets and regulations, U.S. and foreign policies that affect exports, trade events, and links to additional government and private sector resources are available on the export.gov/infotech Web site. OMMI industry specialists profile current and future industry and market trends on a domestic and global basis in the Department of Commerce U.S. Industry & Trade Outlook publication.
To obtain more information, including a list of OMMI international trade specialists and the regions/industry sectors they cover, contact:
Office of Microelectronics, Medical Equipment, and Instrumentation (OMMI)
U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 1015
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
Tel: (202) 482-2470
FAX: (202) 482-0975
Internet: http://www.export.gov/infotech
TD's Trade Information Center (TIC) is an excellent first stop for new-to-export companies seeking export assistance from the federal government. TIC Trade Specialists: 1) advise exporters on how to find and use government programs; 2) guide businesses through the export process; 3) provide country and regional business counseling, foreign import tariff/tax rates and customs procedures, trade opportunities and best prospects for U.S. companies, distribution channels, standards, and common commercial difficulties; 4) provide information on domestic and overseas trade events; and 5) provide sources of public and private sector export financing. TIC trade specialists also assist exporters in accessing reports and statistics from the computerized National Trade Data Bank and direct them to state and local trade organizations that provide export assistance. To contact the TIC, call 1-800-USA-TRADE; FAX (202) 482-4473; e-mail: TIC@ita.doc.gov; or visit the Web site http://tradeinfo.doc.gov.
The Advocacy Center (AC) aims to ensure that U.S. companies of all sizes are
treated fairly and evaluated on the technical and commercial merits of their
proposals for foreign government tenders. Advocacy assistance is wide and
varied, but often involves U.S. companies that must deal with foreign
governments or government-owned corporations. Assistance can include the visit
of a high-ranking U.S. government official to a key foreign official; direct
support by U.S. officials (including Commerce and State Department officers)
stationed overseas at the U.S. Embassies and Consulates; or, coordinated action
by U.S. government agencies to provide maximum assistance. The AC is at the
core of the President's National Export Strategy and its goal is to ensure
opportunities for American companies. Since its creation in 1993, the AC has
helped hundreds of U.S. companies in various industry sectors win foreign
government contracts valued at more than $2.5 billion. For more information,
visit the AC's Web site: http://www.trade.gov/advocacy.
Working in coordination with the private sector and the US&FCS, TD industry analysts help plan, organize, and execute trade events, including high-level executive missions with the Secretary or Under Secretary of Commerce. Additionally, there are a host of trade conferences and shows held throughout the U.S. and abroad. A searchable list of all ITA trade events can be found at http://www.usatrade.gov.
ITA's Small Business Program is the focal point for trade policy issues concerning SMEs. The program brings the small business point of view to international trade policy discussions, primarily through the Industry Sector Advisory Committees (ISAC) on Small and Minority Business for Trade Policy Matters (ISAC 14), the only advisory committee to the U.S. Government on small and minority business export concerns. The Small Business Program also provides outreach to and plans events for small, women-owned, and minority-owned firms.
Additional information can be found on the Industry Consultations Program's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/td/icp, or by contacting the:
Industry Consultations Program
U.S. Department of Commerce
Tel: 202-482-3268
FAX: 202-482-4452
E-mail: Trade_Advisory_Center@ita.doc.gov
Industry has a voice in U.S. trade policy formulation through the Industry Consultations Program (ICP). The ICP includes more than 500 members and is comprised of seventeen (17) Industry Sector Advisory Committees (ISACs) on Trade Policy Matters and four (4) Industry Functional Committees (IFACs) on Trade Policy Matters. The ISACs represent industry sectors of the U.S. economy, including IT and small and minority businesses. The IFACs address crosscutting issues affecting all industry sectors - customs, standards, intellectual property rights, and e-commerce. Advisors on these committees have direct access to trade policymakers at the Department of Commerce and the USTR and help develop their industry's positions on U.S. trade policy and negotiation objectives.
Additional information can be found on the ICP's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/td/icp, or by contacting the:
Industry Consultations Program
U.S. Department of Commerce
Tel: 202-482-3268
FAX: 202-482-4452
E-mail: Trade_Advisory_Center@ita.doc.gov.
The Office of Export Trading Company Affairs (OETCA) promotes the formation and use of export trade intermediaries and the development of long-term joint export ventures by U.S. firms. OETCA administers two programs available to all U.S. exporters. The Export Trade Certificate of Review Program provides antitrust protection to U.S. firms for collaborative export activities. The MyExports.com™ program is designed to help U.S. producers find export partners and locate export companies, freight forwarders, and other service firms that can facilitate export business. For more information, visit http://www.trade.gov/oetca and http://www.myexports.com.
MDCP is a competitive matching grants program that builds public-private partnerships by providing federal assistance to nonprofit export multipliers such as states, trade associations, chambers of commerce, world trade centers, and small business development centers. These multipliers are particularly effective in reaching and assisting SMEs. Applicants use their own creativity to design projects that will help SMEs to enter, expand, or maintain market share in targeted overseas markets. MDCP awards help underwrite the start-up costs of new export marketing, ventures which these groups are often reluctant to undertake without federal government support. For more information, visit http://www.trade.gov/mdcp.
THE U.S. COMMERCIAL SERVICE (US&FCS)
The US&FCS, one of TD's sister units in ITA, assists U.S. firms in realizing their export potential by providing: 1) exporting advice; 2) information on overseas markets; 3) assistance in identifying international trading partners; 4) support for trade events; and 5) advocacy, among other services. US&FCS trade specialists work in more than 100 Export Assistance Centers across the United States and in more than 150 overseas posts, in approximately 80 foreign countries, which combined represent more than 96 percent of the world market for exports. Lists of trade specialists by U.S. city or country can be found at http://www.usatrade.gov.
Overseas US&FCS offices are housed in U.S. Embassies and Consulates where Commercial Officers serve as intermediaries to businesses and government officials in foreign markets. US&FCS staff members are industry-focused and offer numerous products and services that assist U.S. companies to enter or expand their sales in a particular market. The main activities of these offices include establishing key industry and foreign government contacts, helping match U.S. suppliers with local buyers, developing market research, and organizing or facilitating trade events. Contact information for US&FCS trade specialists who cover the IT, telecommunications, and e-commerce sectors in China is listed in the appendices of this report.
The US&FCS provides export counseling and marketing assistance to the U.S. business community through its 1,800 trade experts working in more than 100 domestic Export Assistance Centers (USEACs) located across the country. USEAC staff coordinate work closely with their US&FCS colleagues stationed overseas to match U.S. suppliers with foreign buyers. USEACs help firms enter new markets and increase market share by identifying the best markets for their products and services, and developing an effective market entry strategy informed by input generated in the overseas offices. They also advise clients on practical exporting matters such as distribution channels, programs and services, and relevant trade shows and missions, as well as assisting with trade finance programs available through federal, state, and local entities.
Industry Sector Analysis (ISA)
ISAs are structured market research reports produced on location in leading overseas markets and cover market size and outlook, with competitive and end-user analysis for the selected industry sector. ISAs are available through the U.S. Commercial Service's Web site http://www.usatrade.gov and are a component of the National Trade Data Bank (NTDB) subscription service detailed below.
International Marketing Insight (IMI)
IMIs are written by overseas and multilateral development bank staff and cover information on the dynamics of a particular industry sector in one foreign market. IMIs are available through the U.S. Commercial Service's Web site (http://www.usatrade.gov) and are a component of the NTDB subscription service detailed below.
Country Commercial Guide (CCG)
CCGs are prepared annually by U.S. Embassy staff and contain information on the business and economic situation of foreign countries and the political climate as it affects U.S. business. Each CCG contains the same chapters, covering topics such as marketing U.S. products, foreign trade regulations and standards, investment climate, business travel, and in-country contact information. CCGs are available through the U.S. Commercial Service's Web site (http://www.usatrade.gov) and are also a component of the NTDB subscription service noted below.
National Trade Data Bank (NTDB)
The U.S. Commercial Service contributes to the NTDB, a one-stop source of international documents, including market research reports, trade leads and contacts, statistical trade data collected by federal agencies that contains more than 200,000 trade-related information, and Country Commercial Guides. The NTDB subscription may be purchased on CD-ROM, accessed through the Internet (http://www.stat-usa.gov), or is accessible free of charge at federal depository libraries. Call 1-800-STAT-USA for more information and ordering instructions.
The Platinum Key offers customized, long-term assistance to U.S. companies seeking to enter a new market, win a contract, lower a trade barrier, or resolve complex issues. Fees depend on the scope of work.
The Gold Key is a custom-tailored service for U.S. firms planning to visit a country. This service provides assistance in developing a sound market strategy, orientation briefings, introductions to pre-screened potential partners, interpreters for meetings, and effective follow-up planning. The fees range from $150 to $700 (for the first day) per country.
Flexible Market Research (FMR)
FMR provides customized responses to questions and issues related to a client's product or service. Available on a quick turnaround basis, the research addresses overall marketability of the product, key competitors, price of comparable products, customary distribution and promotion practices, trade barriers, potential business partners, and more. Fees vary according to scope of work.
International Partner Search (IPS)
IPS provides a customized search that helps identify well-matched agents, distributors, licensees and strategic alliance partners. A fee of $600 per country is charged.
BuyUSA.com (http://www.buyusa.com) provides a one-stop international marketplace for U.S. small to medium-sized enterprises to identify potential international partners and transact business on-line. The BuyUSA.com e-marketplace includes pre-screened trade leads from around the world, as well as automated searching and sourcing of sales offers on-line. BuyUSA.com is the only Web site of its kind to combine an on-line interface with a worldwide network of one-on-one trade counselors.
International Buyer Program (IBP)
IBP, supporting 28 major domestic trade exhibitions annually, undertakes for each show a worldwide promotional campaign aimed at maximizing international attendance through work with the overseas network of Commercial Service and Embassy offices. Qualified buyers and prospective distributors, many brought as part of delegations led by overseas commercial staff, are assisted in meeting with interested exhibiting firms and provided services aimed at helping them find new suppliers and trade partners. Each show features an International Business Center at which export counseling, matchmaking, interpreter, and other business services are provided to international visitors and exhibitors.
The "Virtual Matchmaker," "Video Gold Key," and "Video Market Briefing" programs provide an effective tool to help U.S. companies assess an overseas market or overseas business contacts before venturing abroad to close a deal. Companies can use these cost-effective video services to interview international contacts, get a briefing from overseas industry specialists on prospects and opportunities, or develop a customized solution to international business needs.
The Matchmaker Trade Delegation Program is designed to match small to medium-sized new-to-market or new-to-export U.S. firms with qualified business contacts abroad. Each mission targets major markets in two or three countries that have strong potential for U.S. goods and services. Delegation members travel to each country and benefit from export counseling, interpreter service and logistics support, market research, in-depth market briefings, and a personalized itinerary of business appointments screened by commercial specialists at U.S. Embassies and Consulates.
This program showcases U.S. company product literature through exhibits in international trade shows held in both mature and emerging markets. The Product Literature Center is a low cost, efficient way for small and medium-sized firms to get worldwide sales leads in their particular industry. A Commerce Department industry/international specialist or the U.S. Embassy operates Product Literature Centers. Visitors to Product Literature Centers are required to register and may take company literature with them. All sales leads are sent directly to the Product Literature Center participant.
This program showcases U.S. company product literature in fast-growing markets within a geographic region. The U.S. Department of Commerce and representatives from state development agencies present product literature to hundreds of interested business prospects abroad and send the trade leads directly to U.S. participants.
Commercial News USA (CNUSA)
CNUSA, a catalog-magazine containing advertisements of U.S. products serves to promote U.S. products and services to more than 400,000 potential buyers and partners in 145 countries.
APPENDIX
A:
Information
Technology Agreement Products by Harmonized System Classification Number
|
|
HS96 |
|
HS description |
|
|
3818 |
|
Chemical elements doped for use in electronics, in form of discs, wafers or similar forms; chemical compounds doped for use in electronics |
|
|
8469 |
11 |
Word processing machines |
|
|
8470 |
|
Calculating machines and pocketsize data recording, reproducing and displaying machines with a calculating function; accounting machines, postage franking machines, ticket issuing machines and similar machines, incorporating a calculating devices; cash registers: |
|
|
8470 |
10 |
Electronic calculators capable of operating without an external source of electric power and pocket size data recording, reproducing and displaying machines with calculating functions |
|
|
8470 |
21 |
Other electronic calculating machines incorporating a printing device |
|
|
8470 |
29 |
Other |
|
|
8470 |
30 |
Other calculating machines |
|
|
8470 |
40 |
Accounting machines |
|
|
8470 |
50 |
Cash registers |
|
|
8470 |
90 |
Other |
|
|
8471 |
|
Automatic data processing machines and units thereof; magnetic or optical readers, machines for transcribing data onto data media in coded form and machines for processing such data, not elsewhere specified or included: |
|
|
8471 |
10 |
Analogue or hybrid automatic data processing machines |
|
|
8471 |
30 |
Portable digital automatic data processing machines, weighing no more than 10 kg, consisting of at least a central processing unit, a keyboard and a display |
|
|
8471 |
41 |
Other digital automatic data processing machines comprising in the same housing at least a central processing unit and an input and output unit, whether or not combined |
|
|
8471 |
49 |
Other digital automatic data processing machines presented in the form of systems |
|
|
8471 |
50 |
Digital processing units other than those of subheading 8471 41 and 8471 49, whether or not in the same housing one or two of the following types of units : storage units, input units, output units |
|
|
8471 |
60 |
Input or output units, whether or not containing storage units in the same housing |
|
|
8471 |
70 |
Storage units, including central storage units, optical disk storage units, hard disk drives and magnetic tape storage units |
|
|
8471 |
80 |
Other units of automatic data processing machines |
|
|
8471 |
90 |
Other |
|
ex |
8472 |
90 |
Automatic teller machines |
|
|
8473 |
21 |
Parts and accessories of the machines of heading No 8470 of the electronic calculating machines of subheading 8470 10, 8470 21 and 8470 29 |
|
|
8473 |
29 |
Parts and accessories of the machines of heading No 8470 other than the electronic calculating machines of subheading 8470 10, 8470 21 and 8470 29 |
|
|
8473 |
30 |
Parts and accessories of the machines of heading No 8471 |
|
|
8473 |
50 |
Parts and accessories equally suitable for use with machines of two or more of the headings Nos. 8469 to 8472 |
|
ex |
8504 |
40 |
Static converters for automatic data processing machines and units thereof, and telecommunication apparatus |
|
ex |
8504 |
50 |
Other inductors for power supplies for automatic data processing machines and units thereof, and telecommunication apparatus |
|
|
8517 |
|
Electrical apparatus for line telephony or line telegraphy, including line telephone sets with cordless handsets and telecommunication apparatus for carrier current line systems or for digital line systems; videophones: |
|
|
8517 |
11 |
Line telephone sets with cordless handsets |
|
|
8517 |
19 |
Other telephone sets and videophones |
|
|
8517 |
21 |
Facsimile machines |
|
|
8517 |
22 |
Teleprinters |
|
|
8517 |
30 |
Telephonic or telegraphic switching apparatus |
|
|
8517 |
50 |
Other apparatus, for carrier current line systems or for digital line systems |
|
|
8517 |
80 |
Other apparatus including entry phone systems |
|
|
8517 |
90 |
Parts of apparatus of heading 8517 |
|
ex |
8518 |
10 |
Microphones having a frequency range of 300 Hz to 3,4 KHz with a diameter of not exceeding 10 mm and a height not exceeding 3 mm, for telecommunication use |
|
ex |
8518 |
30 |
Line telephone handsets |
|
ex |
8518 |
29 |
Loudspeakers, without housing, having a frequency range of 300 Hz to 3,4 KHz with a diameter of not exceeding 50 mm, for telecommunication use |
|
|
8520 |
20 |
Telephone answering machines |
|
|
8523 |
11 |
Magnetic tapes of a width not exceeding 4 mm |
|
|
8523 |
12 |
Magnetic tapes of a width exceeding 4 mm but not exceeding 6,5 mm |
|
|
8523 |
13 |
Magnetic tapes of a width exceeding 6,5 mm |
|
|
8523 |
20 |
Magnetic discs |
|
|
8523 |
90 |
Other |
|
|
8524 |
31 |
Discs for laser reading systems for reproducing phenomena other than sound or image |
|
ex |
8524 |
39 |
Other : for reproducing representations of instructions, data, sound, and
image, recorded in a machine readable binary form, and capable of being
manipulated or providing interactivity to a user, by means of an automatic
data processing machine |
|
|
8524 |
40 |
Magnetic tapes for reproducing phenomena other than sound or image |
|
|
8524 |
91 |
Media for reproducing phenomena other than sound or image |
|
ex |
8424 |
99 |
Other : for reproducing representations of instructions, data, sound, and
image, recorded in a machine readable binary form, and capable of being
manipulated or providing interactivity to a user, by means of an automatic
data processing machine |
|
ex |
8525 |
10 |
Transmission apparatus other than apparatus for radio broadcasting or television |
|
|
8525 |
20 |
Transmission apparatus incorporating reception apparatus |
|
ex |
8525 |
40 |
Digital still image video cameras |
|
ex |
8527 |
90 |
Portable receivers for calling, alerting or paging |
|
ex |
8529 |
10 |
Aerials or antennae of a kind used with apparatus for radiotelephony and radiotelegraphy |
|
ex |
8529 |
90 |
Parts of: transmission apparatus other than apparatus for radio broadcasting
or television transmission apparatus incorporating reception apparatus digital still image video cameras, portable receivers for calling, alerting or paging |
|
|
8531 |
20 |
Indicator panels incorporating liquid crystal devices (LCD) or light emitting diodes (LED) |
|
ex |
8531 |
90 |
Parts of apparatus of subheading 8531 20 |
|
|
8532 |
|
Electrical capacitors, fixed, variable or adjustable (preset): |
|
|
8532 |
10 |
Fixed capacitors designed for use in 50/60 Hz circuits and having a reactive power handling capacity of not less than 0,5 kvar (power capacitors) |
|
|
8532 |
21 |
Tantalum fixed capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
22 |
Aluminium electrolytic fixed capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
23 |
Ceramic dielectric, single layer fixed capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
24 |
Ceramic dielectric, multilayer fixed capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
25 |
Dielectric fixed capacitors of paper or plastics |
|
|
8532 |
29 |
Other fixed capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
30 |
Variable or adjustable (preset) capacitors |
|
|
8532 |
90 |
Parts |
|
|
8533 |
|
Electrical resistors (including rheostats and potentiometers), other than heating resistors: |
|
|
8533 |
10 |
Fixed carbon resistors, composition or film types |
|
|
8533 |
21 |
Other fixed resistors for a power handling capacity not exceeding 20 W |
|
|
8533 |
29 |
Other fixed resistors for a power handling capacity of 20 W or more |
|
|
8533 |
31 |
Wire-wound variable resistors, including rheostats and potentiometers, for a power handling capacity not exceeding 20 W |
|
|
8533 |
39 |
Wire-wound variable resistors, including rheostats and potentiometers, for a power handling capacity of 20 W or more |
|
|
8533 |
40 |
Other variable resistors, including rheostats and potentiometers |
|
|
8533 |
90 |
Parts |
|
|
8534 |
|
Printed circuits |
|
ex |
8536 |
50 |
Electronic AC switches consisting of optically coupled input and output circuits (Insulated thyristor AC switches) |
|
ex |
8536 |
50 |
Electronic switches, including temperature protected electronic switches, consisting of a transistor and a logic chip (chip-on-chip technology) for a voltage not exceeding 1000 volts |
|
ex |
8536 |
50 |
Electromechanical snap-action switches for a current not exceeding 11 amps |
|
ex |
8536 |
69 |
Plugs and sockets for coaxial cables and printed circuits |
|
ex |
8536 |
90 |
Connection and contact elements for wires and cables |
|
|
8541 |
|
Diodes, transistors and similar semiconductor devices; photosensitive semiconductor devices, including photovoltaic cells whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels; light emitting diodes; mounted piezoelectric crystals: |
|
|
8541 |
10 |
Diodes, other than photosensitive or light emitting diodes |
|
|
8541 |
21 |
Transistors, other than photosensitive transistors, with a dissipation rate of less than 1 W |
|
|
8541 |
29 |
Transistors, other than photosensitive transistors, with a dissipation rate of 1 W or more |
|
|
8541 |
30 |
Thyristors, diacs and triacs, other than photosensitive devices |
|
|
8541 |
40 |
Photosensitive semiconductor devices, including photovoltaic cells whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels; light emitting diodes |
|
|
8541 |
50 |
Other semiconductor devices |
|
|
8541 |
60 |
Mounted piezoelectric crystals |
|
|
8541 |
90 |
Parts |
|
|
8542 |
|
Electronic integrated circuits and microassemblies |
|
|
8542 |
12 |
Cards incorporating an electronic integrated circuit ('smart' cards) |
|
|
8542 |
13 |
Metal oxide semiconductors (MOS technology) |
|
|
8542 |
14 |
Circuits obtained by bipolar technology |
|
|
8542 |
19 |
Other monolithic digital integrated circuits, including circuits obtained by a combination of bipolar and MOS technologies (BIMOS technology) |
|
|
8542 |
30 |
Other monolithic integrated circuits |
|
|
8542 |
40 |
Hybrid integrated circuits |
|
|
8542 |
50 |
Electronic microassemblies |
|
|
8542 |
90 |
Part |
|
|
8543 |
81 |
Proximity cards and tags |
|
ex |
8543 |
89 |
Electrical machines with translation or dictionary functions |
|
ex |
8544 |
41 |
Other electric conductors, for a voltage not exceeding 80 V, fitted with connectors, of a kind used for telecommunications |
|
ex |
8544 |
49 |
Other electric conductors, for a voltage not exceeding 80 V, not fitted with connectors, of a kind used for telecommunications |
|
ex |
8544 |
51 |
Other electric conductors, for a voltage exceeding 80 V but not exceeding 1000 V, fitted with connectors, of a kind used for telecommunications |
|
|
8544 |
70 |
Optical fibre cables |
|
|
9009 |
11 |
Electrostatic photocopying apparatus, operating by reproducing the original image directly onto the copy (direct process)] |
|
|
9009 |
21 |
Other photocopying apparatus, incorporating an optical system |
|
|
9009 |
90 |
Parts and accessories |
|
|
9026 |
|
Instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking the flow, level, pressure or other variables of liquids or gases (for example, flow meters, level gauges, manometers, heat meters), excluding instruments and apparatus of heading No 9014, 9015, 9028 or 9032: |
|
|
9026 |
10 |
Instruments for measuring or checking the flow or level of liquids |
|
|
9026 |
20 |
Instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking pressure |
|
|
9026 |
80 |
Other instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking of heading 9026 |
|
|
9026 |
90 |
Parts and accessories of instruments and apparatus of heading 9026 |
|
|
9027 |
20 |
Chromatographs and electrophoresis instruments |
|
|
9027 |
30 |
Spectrometers, spectrophotometers and spectrographs using optical radiations (UV, visible, IR) |
|
|
9027 |
50 |
Other instruments and apparatus using optical radiations (UV, visible, IR) of heading No 9027 |
|
|
9027 |
80 |
Other instruments and apparatus of heading No 9027 (other than those of heading No 9027 10) |
|
ex |
9027 |
90 |
Parts and accessories of products of heading 9027, other than for gas or smoke analysis apparatus and microtomes |
|
|
9030 |
40 |
Instruments and apparatus for measuring and checking, specially designed for telecommunications (for example, cross-talk meters, gain measuring instruments, distortion factor meters, psophometers) |
Semiconductor manufacturing and testing equipment and parts thereof
|
|
HS Code |
Description |
Comments |
|
ex |
7017 10 |
Quartz reactor tubes and holders designed for insertion into diffusion and oxidation furnaces for production of semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8419 89 |
Chemical vapor deposition apparatus for semiconductor production |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8419 90 |
Parts of chemical vapor deposition apparatus for semiconductor production |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8421 19 |
Spin dryers for semiconductor wafer processing |
|
|
ex |
8421 91 |
Parts of spin dryers for semiconductor wafer processing |
|
|
ex |
8424 89 |
Deflash machines for cleaning and removing contaminants from the metal leads of semiconductor packages prior to the electroplating process |
|
|
ex |
8424 89 |
Spraying appliances for etching, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8424 90 |
Parts of spraying appliances for etching, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8456 10 |
Machines for working any material by removal of material, by laser or other light or photo beam in the production of semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8456 91 |
Apparatus for stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
|
8456 91 |
Machines for dry etching patterns on semiconductor materials |
|
|
ex |
8456 99 |
Focused ion beam milling machines to produce or repair masks and reticles for patterns on semiconductor devices |
|
|
ex |
8456 99 |
Laser cutters for cutting contacting tracks in semiconductor production by laser beam |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8464 10 |
Machines for sawing monocrystal semiconductor boules into slices, or wafers into chips |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8464 20 |
Grinding, polishing and lapping machines for processing of semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8464 90 |
Dicing machines for scribing or scoring semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8466 91 |
Parts for machines for sawing monocrystal semiconductor boules into slices, or wafers into chips |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8466 91 |
Parts of dicing machines for scribing or scoring semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8466 91 |
Parts of grinding, polishing and lapping machines for processing of semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8466 93 |
Parts of focused ion beam milling machines to produce or repair masks and reticles for patterns on semiconductor devices |
|
|
ex |
8466 93 |
Parts of laser cutters for cutting contacting tracks in semiconductor production by laser beam |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8466 93 |
Parts of machines for working any material by removal of material, by laser or other light or photo beam in the production of semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8456 93 |
Parts of apparatus for stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8466 93 |
Parts of machines for dry etching patterns on semiconductor materials |
|
|
ex |
8477 10 |
Encapsulation equipment for assembly of semiconductors |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8477 90 |
Parts of encapsulation equipment |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 50 |
Automated machines for transport, handling and storage of semiconductor wafers, wafer cassettes, wafer boxes and other material for semiconductor devices |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Apparatus for growing or pulling monocrystal semiconductor boules |
|
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Apparatus for physical deposition by sputtering on semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Apparatus for wet etching, developing, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers and flat panel displays |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Die attach apparatus, tape automated bonders, and wire bonders for assembly of semiconductors |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Encapsulation equipment for assembly of semiconductors |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Epitaxial deposition machines for semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Machines for bending, folding and straightening semiconductor leads |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Physical deposition apparatus for semiconductor production |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 89 |
Spinners for coating photographic emulsions on semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Part of apparatus for physical deposition by sputtering on semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts for die attach apparatus, tape automated bonders, and wire bonders for assembly of semiconductors |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts for spinners for coating photographic emulsions on semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of apparatus for growing or pulling monocrystal semiconductor boules |
|
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of apparatus for wet etching, developing, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers and flat panel displays |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of automated machines for transport, handling and storage of semiconductor wafers, wafer cassettes, wafer boxes and other material for semiconductor devices |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of encapsulation equipment for assembly of semiconductors |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of epitaxial deposition machines for semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of machines for bending, folding and straightening semiconductor leads |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8479 90 |
Parts of physical deposition apparatus for for semiconductor production |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8480 71 |
Injection and compression moulds for the manufacture of semiconductor devices |
|
|
ex |
8514 10 |
Resistance heated furnaces and ovens for the manufacture of semiconductor devices on semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8514 20 |
Inductance or dielectric furnaces and ovens for the manufacture of semiconductor devices on semiconductors wafers |
|
|
ex |
8514 30 |
Apparatus for rapid heating of semiconductor wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8514 30 |
Parts of resistance heated furnaces and ovens for the manufacture of semiconductor devices on semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
8514 90 |
Parts of apparatus for rapid heating of wafers |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8514 90 |
Parts of furnaces and ovens of Headings No 8514 10 to No 8514 30 |
|
|
ex |
8536 90 |
Wafer probers |
For Attachment B |
|
|
8543 11 |
Ion implanters for doping semiconductor materials |
|
|
ex |
8543 30 |
Apparatus for wet etching, developing, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers and flat panel displays |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8543 90 |
Parts of apparatus for wet etching, developing, stripping or cleaning semiconductor wafers and flat panel displays |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
8543 90 |
Parts of ion implanters for doping semiconductor materials |
|
|
|
9010 41 to 9010 49 |
Apparatus for projection, drawing or plating circuit patterns on sensitized semiconductor materials and flat panel displays |
|
|
ex |
9010 90 |
Parts and accessories of the apparatus of Headings No 9010 41 to 9010 49 |
|
|
ex |
9011 10 |
Optical stereoscopic microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9011 20 |
Photo micrographic microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9011 90 |
Parts and accessories of optical stereoscopic microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9011 90 |
Parts and accessories of photo micrographic microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9012 10 |
Electron beam microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9012 90 |
Parts and accessories of electron beam microscopes fitted with equipment specifically designed for the handling and transport of semiconductor wafers or reticles |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9017 20 |
Pattern generating apparatus of a kind used for producing masks or reticles from photo resist coated substrates |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9017 90 |
Parts and accessories for pattern generating apparatus of a kind used for producing masks or reticles from photo resist coated substrates |
For Attachment B |
|
ex |
9017 90 |
Parts of such pattern generating apparatus |
For Attachment B |
|
|
9030 82 |
Instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking semiconductor wafers or devices |
|
|
ex |
9030 90 |
Parts and accessories of instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking semiconductor wafers or devices |
|
|
ex |
9030 90 |
Parts of instruments and appliances for measuring or checking semiconductor wafers or devices |
|
|
|
9031 41 |
Optical instruments and appliances for inspecting semiconductor wafers or devices or for inspecting masks, photo masks or reticles used in manufacturing semiconductor devices |
|
|
ex |
9031 49 |
Optical instruments and appliances for measuring surface particulate contamination on semiconductor wafers |
|
|
ex |
9031 90 |
Parts and accessories of optical instruments and appliances for inspecting semiconductor wafers or devices or for inspecting masks, photo masks or reticles used in manufacturing semiconductor devices |
|
|
ex |
9031 90 |
Parts and accessories of optical instruments and appliances for measuring surface particulate contamination on semiconductor wafers |
|
Attachment B
Positive list of
specific products to be covered by this agreement wherever they are classified
in the HS.
Where parts are specified, they are to be covered in accordance with HS Notes
2(b) to Section XVI and Chapter 90, respectively.
|
Computers: automatic data processing machines capable of 1) storing the processing program or programs and at least the data immediately necessary for the execution of the program; 2) being freely programmed in accordance with the requirements of the user; 3) performing arithmetical computations specified by the user; and 4) executing, without human intervention, a processing program which requires them to modify their execution, by logical decision during the processing run. The agreement covers such automatic data processing machines whether or not they are able to receive and process with the assistance of central processing unit telephony signals, television signals, or other analogue or digitally processed audio or video signals. Machines performing a specific function other than data processing, or incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine, and not otherwise specified under Attachment A or B, are not covered by this agreement. |
|
Electric amplifiers when used as repeaters in line telephony products falling within this agreement, and parts thereof |
|
Flat panel displays (including LCD, Electro Luminescence, Plasma and other technologies) for products falling within this agreement, and parts thereof. |
|
Network equipment: Local Area Network (LAN) and Wide Area Network (WAN) apparatus, including those products dedicated for use solely or principally to permit the interconnection of automatic data processing machines and units thereof for a network that is used primarily for the sharing of resources such as central processor units, data storage devices and input or output units including adapters, hubs, inline repeaters, converters, concentrators, bridges and routers, and printed circuit assemblies for physical incorporation into automatic data processing machines and units thereof. |
|
Monitors : display units of automatic data processing machines with a cathode ray tube with a dot screen pitch smaller than 0,4 mm not capable of receiving and processing television signals or other analogue or digitally processed audio or video signals without assistance of a central processing unit of a computer as defined in this agreement. The agreement does not, therefore, cover televisions, including high definition televisions. |
|
Optical disc storage units, for automatic data processing machines (including CD drives and DVDdrives), whether or not having the capability of writing/recording as well as reading, whether or not in their own housings. |
|
Paging alert devices , and parts thereof . |
|
Plotters whether input or output units of HS heading No 8471 or drawing or drafting machines of HS heading No 9017. |
|
Printed Circuit Assemblies for products falling within this agreement, including such assemblies for external connections such as cards that conform to the PCMCIA standard. Such printed circuit assemblies consist of one or more printed circuits of heading 8534 with one or more active elements assembled thereon, with or without passive elements "Active elements" means diodes, transistors, and similar semiconductor devices, whether or not photosensitive, of heading 8541, and integrated circuits and micro assemblies of heading 8542. |
|
Projection type flat panel display units used with automatic data processing machines which can display digital information generated by the central processing unit. |
|
Proprietary format storage devices including media therefore for automatic data processing machines, with or without removable media and whether magnetic, optical or other technology, including Bernoulli Box, Syquest, or Zipdrive cartridge storage units. |
|
Multimedia upgrade kits for automatic data processing machines, and units thereof, put up for retail sale, consisting of, at least, speakers and/or microphones as well as a printed circuit assembly that enables the ADP machines and units thereof to process audio signals (sound cards). |
|
Set top boxes which have a communication function : a microprocessor-based device incorporating a modem for gaining access to the Internet, and having a function of interactive information exchange |
APPENDIX
B:
Regulations on
Telecommunications of the People's Republic of China[70]
Adopted by
the 31st Standing Committee Session of the State Council on
September 20, 2000, the Regulations on Telecommunications of the People’s
Republic of China and is hereby officially promulgated.
----Premier Zhu Rongji, September 25, 2000
CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1: These Regulations have been formulated in
order to regulate the telecommunications market, protect the lawful rights and
interests of telecommunications subscribers and telecommunications business
operators, ensure the security of telecommunications networks and information
and promote the healthy development of the telecommunications industry.
Article 2: Anyone that engages in telecommunications
activities or activities related to telecommunications in the People’s Republic
of China must abide by these Regulations.
For the purposes of these Regulations, the term “telecommunications”
means the activity of using wired or wireless electromagnetic or optoelectronic
systems to transmit or receive voice, text, data, images or any other form of
information.
Article 3: The State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry shall supervise and administer the telecommunications
industry nationwide in accordance with these Regulations.
The telecommunications administration authorities of the
provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central
government shall, under the leadership of the State Council’s department in
charge of the information industry, supervise and administer the
telecommunications industry within their respective jurisdictions in accordance
with these Regulations.
Article 4: The supervision and administration of telecommunications
shall conform with the principles of separation of government and enterprise,
the removal of monopoly control, the encouragement of competition, the
promotion of development, transparency, fairness and impartiality.
Telecommunications business operators shall operate in
accordance with the law, abide by business ethics and submit themselves to
supervision and inspection that is carried out in accordance with the law.
Article 5: Telecommunications business operators shall
provide rapid, accurate, secure, convenient and reasonably priced
telecommunications services to telecommunications subscribers.
Article 6: The security of telecommunications networks
and information shall be protected by law. No organization or individual may
use a telecommunications network to engage in activities that compromise State
security or prejudice the public interest or the lawful rights and interests of
third parties.
CHPATER TWO: TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKET
Section One: Telecommunications Business Permits
Article 7: The State implements a system of permits for
the operation of telecommunications business that are classified according to
the type of telecommunications business.
A telecommunications service operating permit issued by
the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry or the
telecommunications administration authority of a province, autonomous region or
municipality directly under the central government must be obtained in
accordance with these Regulations in order to engage in telecommunications business.
No organization or individual may engage in telecommunications
business activities without obtaining a telecommunications service operating permit.
Article 8: Telecommunications business is divided into
basic telecommunications services and value added telecommunications services.
“Basic telecommunications services” means the business of
providing public network infrastructure, public data transmission and basic
voice communications services. “Value-added telecommunications services” means
the telecommunications and information services provided through the public
network infrastructure.
The specific classification of types of telecommunications
services is provided in the Classification of Telecommunications Services
attached hereto. The State Council’s department in charge of the Information
industry may make partial adjustments tothe categories of telecommunications
services listed in the Classification in light of actual circumstances and publish
it anew.
Article 9: The operation of basic telecommunication services
shall require the examination and approval of the State Council’s department in
charge of the information industry and the obtaining of a Basic Telecommunications
Service Operating Permit.
The operation of value-added telecommunications services
covering an area across two or more provinces, autonomous regions and/or
municipalities directly under the central government shall require the examination
and approval of the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry and the obtaining of a Cross-regional Value-added Telecommunications
Service Operating Permit. The operation of value-added telecommunications
services covering an area within one province, autonomous region or
municipality directly under the central government shall require the examination
and approval of the telecommunications administration authority of the said
province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central
government and the obtaining of a Value-added Telecommunications Service
Operating Permit.
If new technology is used to provide, on a trial basis, a
new type of telecommunications service not listed in the Classification of
Telecommunications Services, such service shall be placed on the record with
the telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous
region or municipality directly under the central government.
Article 10: The following conditions shall be met in order
to operate basic telecommunications services:
(1) the operator shall be a legally established company that
specializes in basic telecommunications services and in which the State’s
equity or shareholding is not less than 51%;
(2) there is a feasibility study and a technical plan for
formation of the network;
(3) there are funds and specialized personnel commensurate
with the business activities to be engaged in;
(4) there is a site and corresponding resources to carry out
the business activities;
(5) the operator has the reputation or the capability to provide
long term service to its subscribers; and
(6) other conditions specified by the State.
Article 11: When applying to operate basic telecommunications
services, an application accompanied by documentation related to the conditions
specified in Article 10 hereof shall be submitted to the State Council’s
department in charge of the information industry. The State Council’s department
in charge of the information industry shall complete its examination and render
its decision to approve or reject the application within 180 days of the date
of the receipt of such application. If it approves the application it shall
issue a Basic Telecommunications Service Operating Permit and if it rejects the
application it shall notify the applicant in writing and explain the reason
therefor.
Article 12: When examining an application for the operation
of Basic Telecommunications Services, the State Council’s department in charge
of the information industry shall consider such factors as State security, telecommunications
network security, continuous usability of telecommunications resources, environmental
protection and the state of competition in the telecommunications market, etc.
The issuance of Basic Telecommunications Service Operating
Permits shall require the invitation of tenders in accordance with the relevant
State regulations.
Article 13: The following conditions shall be met in order
to operate value-added telecommunications services:
(1) the operator shall be a legally established company;
(2) there are funds and specialized personnel commensurate
with the business activities to be developed;
(3) the operator has the reputation or the capability to provide
long term service to its subscribers; and
(4) other conditions specified by the State.
Article 14: When applying to operate value-added telecommunications
services, an application accompanied by documentation related to the conditions
specified in Article 13 hereof shall be submitted to the State Council’s
department in charge of the information industry or the telecommunications administration
authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the
central government pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 9 hereof. If the
relevant State regulations require that the value-added telecommunications
service applied for be examined and approved by the relevant competent
authority, the approval document from the relevant competent authority shall
also be submitted.
The State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry or the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government shall
complete its examination and render its decision to approve or reject the
application within 60 days of the date of the receipt of such application. If it
approves the application, it shall issue a Crossregional
Value-added Telecommunications Service Operating Permit
or a Value-added Telecommunications Service Operating Permit and if it rejects
the application, it shall notify the applicant in writing and explain the
reason therefor.
Article 15: If a telecommunications business operator changes
the operating entity or its scope of business during the course of operations,
or if it ceases operations, it shall submit an application to the original permit
issuing authority 90 days in advance and carry out the appropriate procedures.
If it is ceasing operations, it shall also duly take care of the consequences
thereof, in accordance with the relevant State regulations.
Article 16: After receiving approval to engage in telecommunications
business, the operator shall register with the enterprise registration
authority on the strength of its legally obtained telecommunications service
operating permit.
Operators of dedicated telecommunications networks that
operate local telecommunications services shall submit an application in
accordance with the conditions and the procedures specified herein and, after
receiving approval and obtaining a telecommunications service operating permit,
carry out registration procedures in accordance with the provisions of the
preceding paragraph.
Section
Two: Interconnection of Telecommunications Networks
Article 17: Interconnection of telecommunications networks
shall be effected on the basis of the principles of technical feasibility,
economic sense, fairness, impartiality and mutual complementation.
Leading telecommunications business operators may not
refuse interconnection requests from other telecommunications business
operators and operators of dedicated networks.
For the purposes of the preceding paragraph, the term “leading
telecommunications business operators” means operators that control vital
telecommunications infrastructure, have a relatively large share of the telecommunications
market and can materially influence the entry of other telecommunications business
operators into the telecommunications business market.
Leading telecommunications business operators shall be
determined by the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry.
Article 18: A leading telecommunications business operator
shall formulate interconnection rules that include such details as the
procedure and time limit for network interconnection and a list of unbundled network
elements in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination and transparency.
The interconnection rules shall be submitted to the State Council’s department
in charge of the information industry for its examination and consent. Such connection
rules shall be binding on the interconnection activities of the leading
telecommunications business operator.
Article 19: Interconnections between public telecommunications
networks and between public telecommunications networks and dedicated telecommunications
networks shall require the holding of consultations and entry into an agreement
on network interconnection between the parties to the interconnection in
accordance with the regulations for the administration of network
interconnections formulated by the State Council’s department in charge of the
information industry.
Network interconnection agreements shall be placed on the
record with the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry.
Article 20: If the consultations between the parties to a
network interconnection fail to produce a network interconnection agreement,
either party may apply to the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry or the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government,
depending on the area covered by the network interconnection, for mediation
within 60 days from the date a party made the interconnection request.
The authority receiving the application shall mediate in
accordance with the principles specified in the first paragraph of Article 17
hereof in order to cause the parties to the network interconnection to reach an
agreement. If the parties to the network interconnection are unable to reach an
agreement through mediation within 45 days after the date either or both
parties applied for mediation, the mediating authority shall randomly invite
telecommunications technology experts and other experts in related fields to
conduct open discussions and put forward a network interconnection plan. The
mediating authority shall render a decision based on the conclusions reached by
the experts in their discussions and the network interconnection plan they put
forward, and forcibly effectuate the interconnection.
Article 21: The parties to the network interconnection must
effectuate the interconnection within the time limit specified in the agreement
or decision. Neither party may sever the interconnection without the approval
of the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry. If a
malfunction occurs in the network interconnection’s communications technology, the
parties shall promptly take effective measures to eliminate it. If a dispute
arises between the parties to the network interconnection during the
interconnection of their networks, such dispute shall be handled in accordance
with the procedures and methods specified in Article 20 hereof.
The quality of communications through the network interconnection
shall comply with the relevant State standards. When a leading
telecommunications business operator provides network interconnections to other
telecommunications business operators, its service quality shall not be
inferior to the quality of similar services on its own network or the quality
of similar services it provides to its subsidiaries or branches.
Article 22: The settlement and apportionment of fees for
network interconnections shall be handled in accordance with the relevant State
regulations, and no fee additional to the specified rate may be charged.
The technical standards, fee settlement methods and specific
administration regulations for network interconnections shall be formulated by
the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry.
Section Three: Telecommunications Charges
Article 23: Cost shall be the basic principle for the fixing
of telecommunications charge rates, while such factors as the development
requirements of the national economy and society, the development of the telecommunications
industry and the telecommunications subscribers’ ability to pay shall also be
taken into consideration.
Article 24: Telecommunications charges are divided into
those regulated by the market, those guided by the government and those fixed
by the government. Charges for basic telecommunications services shall be fixed
by the government, guided by the government or regulated by the market. Charges
for value-added telecommunications services shall be regulated by the market or
guided by the government.
Charges for telecommunications services for which there
is sufficient competition in the market shall be regulated by the market.
The classification list for the administration of telecommunications
charges that are fixed by the government, guided by the government or regulated
by the market shall be formulated, and published for implementation, by the
State Council’s department in charge of the information industry after seeking
the opinion of the State Council’s department in charge of pricing.
Article 25: The State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry shall propose the important telecommunications service
charge rates that are to be fixed by the government, seek the opinion of the
State Council’s department in charge of pricing and issue and implement such
charge rates after approval by the State Council.
The band for telecommunications service charge rates that
are to be guided by the government shall be formulated, and published for
implementation, by the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry
after seeking the opinion of the State Council’s department in charge of
pricing. Telecommunications business operators shall autonomously determine
their charge rates within the band and file their charge rates with the
telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous region
or municipality directly under the central government for the record.
Article 26: When formulating telecommunications service
charge rates that are to be fixed or guided by the government, the opinions of
telecommunications business operators, telecommunications subscribers and other
relevant parties shall be obtained through the holding of hearings.
Telecommunications business operators shall submit accurate
and complete business cost data and other relevant information pursuant to the
request of the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry
or the telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous
region or municipality directly under the central government.
Section Four: Telecommunications Resources
Article 27: The State shall make unified plans for, centrally
administer and rationally allocate telecommunications resources and implement a
system of compensation for use thereof.
For the purposes of the preceding paragraph, the term “telecommunications
resources” refers to such limited resources used to enable telecommunications
functions as radio frequencies , orbital slots and telecommunications network
numbers. Article 28: Telecommunications business operators that possess or use
telecommunications resources shall pay a telecommunications Resource fee. The
specific measures for charging fees shall be formulated by the State Council’s
department in charge of the information industry in concert with the State
Council’s finance department and department in charge of pricing, and, after
approval by the State Council, be published for implementation.
Article 29: When allocating telecommunications resources,
consideration shall be given to telecommunications Resource planning, the
purposes for which such resources will be used and projected service
capabilities.
Telecommunications resources may be allocated through
allotment or auction. Entities that have obtained the right to use telecommunication
resources shall, within the specified time limit, commence using the resources
allocated to them and attain the minimum specified scale of use.
Telecommunications resources may not be used, assigned or
leased nor the purpose for which they are used changed without the approval of
the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry or the
telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous region
or municipality directly under the central government.
Article 30: After a user of telecommunications resources
legally obtains numeric resources for a telecommunications network , leading telecommunications
business operators and other relevant work units shall be under obligation to
adopt the necessary technical measures to cooperate with the user of the
telecommunications resources in enabling such user’s numeric resources to
function.
If laws or administrative regulations contain special provisions
concerning the administration of telecommunications resources, such provisions
shall govern.
CHAPTER THREE: TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
Article 31: Telecommunications business operators shall
provide services to telecommunications subscribers in accordance with the
telecommunications service rates specified by the State. The types and scopes of,
and the charge rates and time limits for, the services provided by a
telecommunications business operator shall be made public and filed with the telecommunications
administration authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality
directly under the central government for the record.
Telecommunications subscribers have the right to select at
their own discretion the various types of legally operated telecommunications
service that they wish to use.
Article 32: When a telecommunications subscriber applies
for telecommunications terminal equipment to be installed, or to be reinstalled
in a new location, the telecommunications business operator shall ensure that the
equipment is installed and functioning within the operator’s published time
limit. If the equipment is not installed and functioning within the time limit
due to a reason attributable to the telecommunications business operator, such
operator shall pay the telecommunications subscriber liquidated damages at the
rate of 1% per day of the fee for the installation, the fee for the reinstallation
in a new location or other fee charged.
Article 33: If a telecommunications subscriber reports an
interruption of telecommunications services, the telecommunications business
operator shall make repairs or tune the connection within 48 hours, if in an urban
area, or 72 hours, if in a rural area, from the date of receipt of the report.
If the operator is unable to make the repairs or tune the connection on
schedule, it shall promptly notify the telecommunications subscriber and exempt
him from the payment of the monthly rental fee for the period when service is
interrupted. However, interruptions of telecommunications services arising from
a reason attributable to the telecommunications terminal equipment shall not be
covered hereby.
Article 34: Telecommunications business operators shall
facilitate telecommunications subscribers’ payment of fees and making of
inquiries. If a telecommunications subscriber requests a list of charges for
domestic long distance communications, international communications, mobile
communications and information services, etc., the telecommunications business
operator shall provide such list free of charge.
The moment that a telecommunications business operator
discovers that a telecommunications subscriber has incurred unusually huge telecommunications
charges, it shall notify the telecommunications subscriber as quickly as
possible and take appropriate measures.
For the purposes of the preceding paragraph, the term “huge
telecommunications charges” means charges that arise suddenly and exceed by
more than five times the telecommunications subscriber’s average monthly telecommunications
charges for the preceding three months.
Article 35: Telecommunications subscribers shall pay timely
and in full their telecommunications charges to the telecommunications business
operator by the agreed time and by the agreed method. If a telecommunications
subscriber fails to pay his telecommunications charges on time, the telecommunications
business operator has the right to demand that he pay the telecommunications
charges and may charge him liquidated damages at the rate of 0.3% of the unpaid
charges per day.
If a telecommunications subscriber has still failed to
pay his telecommunications charges 30 days after the agreed time limit for payment,
the telecommunications business operator may suspend the provision of telecommunications
services to him. If the telecommunications subscriber has still failed to pay his
telecommunications charges and liquidated damages within 60 days after the telecommunications
business operator has suspended the provision of telecommunications services to
him, such operator may terminate the provision of services to him and pursue the
payment of the charges owed and the liquidated damages in accordance with the law.
An operator of mobile telecommunications services may
agree upon the time limit for, and method of payment of, telecommunications
charges with telecommunications subscribers, and, in doing so, it shall not be
bound by the time limits specified in the preceding paragraph.
The telecommunications business operator shall restore suspended
telecommunications services within 48 hours of the payment of the overdue telecommunications
charges and the liquidated damages by a telecommunications subscriber who had failed
to pay his telecommunications charges on time.
Article 36: If normal telecommunications services will or,
may be, affected by a telecommunications business operator’s engineering work,
network construction, etc., the operator must promptly inform subscribers within
the specified time limit and make a report to the telecommunications
administration authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality
directly under the central government.
If telecommunications services are interrupted due to a
reason as specified in the preceding paragraph, the telecommunications business
operator shall reduce or exempt the subscribers’ payment of the charges for the
corresponding period during which telecommunications services were interrupted.
If a circumstance as specified in the first paragraph of this
Article arises and the telecommunications business operator fails to promptly
notify subscribers, it shall indemnify subscribers for losses incurred as a
result thereof.
Article 37: Telecommunications business operators that
operate local telephone services or mobile telephone services shall provide to
subscribers free of charge such public service telecommunications services as
hot lines for reporting fire, crime and traffic accidents and for medical emergencies
and ensure that traffic flows freely on such communications lines.
Article 38: A telecommunications business operator shall
provide equal and reasonable access services in a timely manner to group
subscribers that require access to the operator’s telecommunications network
through a trunk line.
The telecommunications business operator may not discontinue
the access services without approval.
Article 39: Telecommunications business operators shall
establish a sound internal service quality management system and may formulate,
publish and implement enterprise standards that exceed the telecommunications
service standards fixed by the State. Telecommunications business operators
shall adopt various methods to listen to the opinions of telecommunications
subscribers, subject themselves to supervision by the public and continuously
improve the quality of their telecommunications services.
Article 40: If a telecommunications business operator’s
telecommunications services do not meet State standards for telecommunications
services or the enterprise standards published by the operator, or a telecommunication
subscriber has objections to the telecommunications charges he is paying, the
subscriber has the right to require the telecommunications business operator to
resolve the problem. If the telecommunications business operator refuses to resolve
the problem or if the telecommunications subscriber is not satisfied with the
results of the resolution, the subscriber has the right to appeal to the State
Council’s department in charge of the information industry or the
telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous region
or municipality directly under the central government.
The authority that receives the appeal must deal with it
in a timely manner and respond to the appellant within 30 days of the date of
receipt of the appeal.
If a telecommunications subscriber has an objection to the
local telephone charges he is paying, the telecommunications business operator
shall provide free of charge, at the telecommunications subscriber’s request,
the basis on which local telephone charges are billed and be under obligation
to take the necessary measures to assist the telecommunications subscriber in
investigating the cause.
Article 41: While providing telecommunications services,
a telecommunications business operator may not carry out any of the following
acts:
(1) limiting , by any means whatsoever, telecommunications
subscribers to using the telecommunications services that it has designated;
(2) limiting telecommunications subscribers to using telecommunications
terminal equipment it has designated or refusing telecommunications subscribers
’ use of self-supplied telecommunications terminal equipment for which they
have obtained permission to connect to the network;
(3) violating State regulations by modifying, or modifying
in disguised form, its charge rates, or by increasing, or increasing in
disguised form, the items for which it charges fees, without authorization;
(4) refusing, delaying or terminating the provision of telecommunications
services to a telecommunications subscriber without a legitimate reason;
(5) not performing the undertakings it publicly made to
telecommunications subscribers or making false publicity that is likely to
cause confusion; or
(6) making use of improper means to harass telecommunications
subscribers or retaliating against telecommunications subscribers who have filed
a complaint.
Article 42: During the course of telecommunications business
operations, a telecommunications business operator may not carry out any of the
following acts:
(1) using any method whatsoever to limit a telecommunications
subscriber from selecting telecommunications services legally provided by other
telecommunications business operators;
(2) unreasonably cross-subsidizing other business that it
operates; or
(3) engaging in unfair competition by providing telecommunications
business or services below cost, in order to squeeze out competitors.
Article 43: The State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of
the provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities directly under the central government
shall ex officio supervise and examine the quality of the telecommunications
services and the business activities of telecommunications business operators
and make public the results of their supervision and spot checks.
Article 44: Telecommunications business operators must
perform their corresponding obligations to make telecommunications services
universally available, in accordance with relevant State regulations.
The State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry may determine which telecommunications business operators shall assume
specific obligations in respect of the universal availability of
telecommunications services by designating such operators or by inviting
tenders.
The procedures for the administration of the compensation
for the c o s t s of making telecommunications services universally available
shall be formulated by the State Council’s department in charge of the
information industry in concert with the State Council’s financial department
and department in charge of pricing, and, after approval by the State Council,
be published for implementation.
CHAPTER FOUR: TELECOMMUNICATIONS-RELATED CONSTRUCTION
Section One: Construction of Telecommunications Facilities
Article 45: The construction of public telecommunications
networks, dedicated telecommunications networks and radio and television transmission
networks shall be subject to overall planning and industry administration by
the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry.
Before the construction of a public telecommunications network,
dedicated telecommunications network or radio or television transmission
network that is a national information network project or a construction project
above the limit set by the State is submitted for approval in accordance with
the procedures for the examination and approval of State capital construction projects,
the consent of the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry shall be obtained.
Basic telecommunications construction projects shall be incorporated
into the urban construction master plans and village and town construction
master plans of the various levels of local people’s governments.
Article 46: The installation of telecommunications facilities
shall accompany construction in urban areas and in villages and towns. The
telecommunications cables and cable distribution facilities in buildings and the
telecommunications cable ducts within the areas used for construction projects
shall be incorporated into the design documents for the construction projects
and shall be constructed and accepted at the same time as the construction
projects. The necessary funds shall be included in the budgets for the
construction projects.
When relevant work units or authorities plan and construct
roads, bridges, tunnels or subways. They shall notify the telecommunications
administration authority and the telecommunications business operators of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government and
consult with them on such matters as reserving space for telecommunications
cables.
Article 47: Operators of basic telecommunications services
may attach telecommunications circuits to or install such public
telecommunications facilities as small antennae and mobile communications base stations
on civilian buildings, provided that they notify the holders of title to or
users of the buildings in advance and pay a usage fee to the holders of title
to or other rights in the buildings in accordance with the rates set by the
people’s government of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly
under the central government.
Article 48: Signs shall be put up in accordance with the
relevant State regulations when constructing underground, underwater or other
such hidden telecommunications facilities or elevated telecommunications facilities.
An operator of basic telecommunications services shall obtain
the consent of the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry to lay submarine telecommunications cables and shall carry out the relevant
procedures in accordance with the law after obtaining the consent of the
relevant authorities. The relevant department of the State Council shall
indicate submarine telecommunications cables on marine charts.
Article 49: No work unit or individual may modify or move
the telecommunications circuits or other telecommunications facilities of a
third party without authorization. If a situation arises where such circuits or
facilities must be modified or moved, the consent of the holder of title to
such telecommunications facilities shall be obtained, and the work unit or
individual that made the request to modify or move the facilities shall bear
the expenses necessary for, and compensate for the financial losses caused by,
such modification or move.
Article 50: Such activities as construction, production and
the planting of trees may not compromise the safety of telecommunications
circuits or other telecommunications facilities or impede the flow of traffic
on the circuits. In the event that telecommunications safety may be compromised,
the relevant telecommunications business operator shall be notified in advance,
and the work unit or individual engaging in such activity shall be responsible
for taking the necessary precautions to protect the safety of such telecommunications
facilities.
If the provisions of the preceding paragraph are violated,
resulting in damage to telecommunications circuits or other telecommunications
facilities or impeding the flow of traffic on the circuits, the facilities shall
be restored to their original state or repaired and compensation shall be paid
for the financial losses incurred.
Article 51: When constructing telecommunications circuits,
the required safe distance from existing telecommunications circuits shall be
maintained. If the existing circuits are difficult to avoid or must be crossed or
if it is necessary to use existing telecommunications cable ducts,
consultations shall be held with the holder of title to the existing
telecommunications circuits and an agreement entered into. If the consultations
fail to produce an agreement, the State Council’s department in charge of the
information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government,
depending on the circumstances, shall resolve the matter through mediation.
Article 52: No organization or individual may prevent or
hinder the construction of telecommunications facilities or the provision of
public telecommunications services to telecommunications subscribers by operators
of basic telecommunications services in
accordance with the law with the exception, however, of
areas to which State regulations prohibit or restrict access.
Article 53: Telecommunications vehicles that are being used
for special or emergency communications, or for emergency repairs or for
dealing with emergencies may, subject to the approval of the public security
and traffic control authority, be exempted from observing the various
restrictions imposed by signs prohibiting the passage of motor vehicles,
provided that the safety and free flow of traffic is ensured.
Section Two: Connection of Telecommunications Equipment
to Networks
Article 54: Telecommunications terminal equipment, wireless
communication equipment and equipment used in network interconnection shall be
subject to a State-implemented permission system for connecting to networks.
Telecommunications terminal equipment, wireless communication
equipment and equipment used in network interconnection that is connected to
public telecommunications networks must meet State standards, and a network
connection permit must be obtained therefor.
A list of telecommunications equipment subject to network
connection permission shall be formulated by the State Council’s department in
charge of the information industry in concert with the State Council’s product
quality supervision department and be published for implementation.
Article 55: When carrying out the procedures for a network
connection permit for telecommunications equipment, an application shall be
submitted to the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry
together with a testing report issued by a telecommunications equipment testing
organization recognized by the State Council’s product quality supervision
department or a product quality certificate issued by a certification
institute.
The State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry shall complete its examination of the application and the
telecommunications equipment testing report or product quality certificate
within 60 days of the date of receipt of the application for a telecommunications
equipment network connection permit. If the equipment is found to meet the
standards after examination, a network connection permit shall be issued. If
the equipment is found not to meet the standards, a response shall be given in
writing explaining the reason.
Article 56: Telecommunications equipment producers must
ensure that the quality of the telecommunications equipment for which they have
obtained a network connection permit is stable and reliable and they may not
lower the quality or performance of their products.
Telecommunications equipment producers shall affix a
sticker bearing the network connection permission symbol to the
telecommunications equipment for which they have obtained a network connection
permit. The State Council’s product quality supervision department in concert
with the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry shall
perform spot checks to track and supervise the quality of telecommunications
equipment for which a network connection permit has been obtained and publish
the results of such spot checks.
CAPTER FIVE: SECURITY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Article 57: No organization or individual may use telecommunications
networks to produce, reproduce, disseminate or transmit information with
content that:
(1) opposes the fundamental principles determined in
the Constitution;
(2) compromises State security, discloses State secrets, subverts
State power or damages national unity;
(3) harms the dignity or interests of the State;
(4) incites ethnic hatred or racial discrimination or damages
inter-ethnic unity;
(5) sabotages State religious policy or propagates heretical
teachings or feudal superstitions;
(6) disseminates rumours, disturbs social order or disrupts
social stability;
(7) propagates obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence,
murder or fear or incites the commission of crimes;
(8) insults or slanders a third party or infringes upon the
lawful rights and interests of a third party; or
(9) includes other content prohibited by laws or administrative
regulations.
Article 58: No organization or individual may carry out
the following acts that compromise the security of telecommunications networks
or information:
(1) deleting or modifying functions of a telecommunications
network or the data or
application programs stored, processed or transmitted
thereon;
(2) using a telecommunications network to steal or damage
a third party’s information, thereby prejudicing the lawful rights and
interests of such third party;
(3) deliberately creating, replicating or disseminating computer
viruses or using other methods to attack the telecommunications network or
other such telecommunications facilities of a third party; or
(4) carrying out other acts that compromise the security of
a telecommunications network or information.
Article 59: No organization or individual may carry out
the following acts that disrupt the
telecommunications market:
(1) operating international telecommunications services
or telecommunications services to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,
Macao Special Administrative Region or Taiwan region without authorization, by
leasing dedicated international telecommunications lines, privately installing
relay equipment or otherwise;
(2) illegally connecting to a third party’s telecommunications
circuit, reproducing a third party’s telecommunications number(s) or using what
one is well aware to be illegally connected or reproduced telecommunications
facilities or numbers;
(3) counterfeiting or altering telephone cards or any other
valuable vouchers for telecommunications services; or
(4) using a sham identification document, or passing off
oneself under another’s identification document, to carry out network access
procedures and use a mobile telephone.
Article 60: Telecommunications business operators shall
establish a sound internal security system and implement a security
responsibility system in accordance with the State regulations on telecommunications
security.
Article 61: In the course of designing, constructing and operating
a telecommunications network, a telecommunications business operator shall
plan, construct and operate its network in a manner that keeps pace with the
security demands of the State and of telecommunications networks.
Article 62: If during the course of providing public information
services a telecommunications business operator discovers information
transmitted on its telecommunications network that clearly falls within the
scope of content specified in Article 57 hereof, it shall immediately stop the
transmission thereof, keep the relevant records and make a report thereon to
the relevant authority.
Article 63: Telecommunications subscribers shall be responsible
for the content of the information they transmit by means of a
telecommunications network and the consequences thereof.
If the information transmitted by a telecommunications subscriber
through a telecommunications network is secret State information, he must take
measures to maintain the confidentiality of such information in accordance with
the law concerning the maintenance of State secrets.
Article 64: During such emergency situations as the occurrence
of a major natural disaster, the State Council’s department in charge of the
information industry may, subject to the approval of the State Council,
temporarily requisition various kinds of telecommunications facilities to
ensure the flow of important communications.
Article 65: International communications business conducted
in the People’s Republic of China must pass through an international
communications gateway bureau that has been established with the approval of the
State Council’s department in charge of the information industry.
Communications between the mainland and the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region and the
Taiwan region shall be handled mutatis mutandis in accordance with the preceding
paragraph.
Article 66: Telecommunications subscribers’ freedom to
legally use telecommunications and the confidentiality of their communications
are protected by law. No organization or individual may, for any reason
whatsoever, inspect the content of telecommunications, except that public
security authorities, the State security authority and the People’s Procuratorate
may do so in accordance with the procedures stipulated by law in response to
the requirements of State security or the investigation of criminal offences.
No telecommunications business operator or its employees
may provide, without authorization, to a third party the content of information
transmitted through the telecommunications network by telecommunications
subscribers.
CHAPTER SIX: PENAL PROVISIONS
Article 67: If a violation of Article 57 or Article 58 hereof
is committed and such violation constitutes a criminal offence, the criminal
liability of the perpetrator shall be pursued in accordance with the law. If
the violation is insufficient to constitute a criminal offence, the public
security authority or State security authority shall punish the perpetrator in
accordance with the relevant laws and administrative regulations.
Article 68: If any of the acts specified in Items (2),
(3) and (4) of Article 59 hereof is carried out and such act disrupts the
telecommunications market and constitutes a criminal offence, the criminal
liability of the perpetrator shall be pursued. If such act is insufficient to
constitute a criminal offence, the State Council’s department in charge of the
information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government shall
ex officio order rectification of the matter, confiscate the illegal income and
impose a fine of not less than three times and not more than five times the
illegal income; if there is no illegal income or if the illegal income is less
than Rmb10,000, it shall impose a fine of not less than Rmb10,000 and not more
than Rmb100,000.
Article 69: If these Regulations are violated by counterfeiting
or assigning a telecommunications service operating permit or
telecommunications equipment network connection permit, or by fraudulently
using a third party’s telecommunications service operating permit or
telecommunications equipment network connection permit, or by fabricating the
network connection permit code marked on telecommunications equipment, the
State Council’s department in charge of the information industry or the
telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous region
or municipality directly under the central government shall ex officio
confiscate the illegal income and impose a fine of not less than three times
and not more than five times the illegal income; if there is no illegal income
or if the illegal income is less than Rmb 10,000, it shall impose a fine of not
less than Rmb10,000 and not more than Rmb100,000.
Article 70: If these Regulations are violated by the commission
of any of the acts set forth below, the State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of
the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central
government shall ex officio order rectification of the matter, confiscate the illegal
income and impose a fine of not less than three times and not more than five
times the illegal income; if there is no illegal income or if the illegal
income is less than Rmb50,000, it shall impose a fine of not less than Rmb100,000
and not more than Rmb1,000,000; if the case is serious, it shall order the
perpetrator to suspend operations and undergo rectification:
(1) operating telecommunications business without authorization
or beyond one’s scope of business, in violation of the third paragraph of
Article 7 hereof or by commission of an act specified in Item (1) of Article 59
hereof;
(2) establishing an international communications gateway
and operating international communications without the approval of the State Council’s
department in charge of the information industry;
(3) using, assigning or leasing telecommunications resources,
or changing the purpose for which the telecommunications resources are used,
without authorization;
(4) severing a network interconnection, or discontinuing
access services, without authorization; or
(5) refusing to perform obligations in respect of making services
universally available.
Article 71: If these Regulations are violated by the commission
of any of the acts set forth below, the State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of
the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central
government shall ex officio order rectification of the matter, confiscate the
illegal income and impose a fine of not less than one time and not more than
three times the illegal income; if there is no illegal income or if the illegal
income is less than Rmb10,000, it shall impose a fine of not less than
Rmb10,000 and not more than Rmb100,000; if the case is serious, it shall order
the perpetrator to suspend operations and undergo rectification:
(1) violating regulations by charging additional fees in
the course of telecommunications network interconnection;
(2) failing to take effective measures to eliminate a malfunction
arising in the technology for communications between networks;
(3) providing, without authorization, to a third party the
content of information transmitted through a telecommunications network by telecommunications
subscribers; or
(4) refusing to pay fees for the use of telecommunications
resources in accordance with regulations.
Article 72: If the provisions of Article 42 hereof are violated
by competing unfairly in the course of engaging in telecommunications business,
the State Council’s department in charge of the information industry or the
telecommunications administration authority of the province, autonomous region
or municipality directly under the central government shall ex officio order
rectification of the matter and impose a fine of not less than Rmb100,000 and
not more than Rmb1,000,000; if the case is serious, it shall order the
perpetrator to suspend operations and undergo rectification.
Article 73: If these Regulations are violated by the commission
of any of the acts set forth below, the State Council’s department in charge of
the information industry or the telecommunications administration authority of
the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central
government shall ex officio order rectification of the matter and impose a fine
of not less than Rmb50,000 and not more than Rmb500,000; if the case is
serious, it shall order the perpetrator to suspend operations and undergo
rectification:
(1) refusing requests from other telecommunication business
operators for interconnection;
(2) refusing to implement the decision on interconnection
rendered in accordance with the law by the State Council’s department in charge
of the information industry or the telecommunications administration authority
of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central
government; or
(3) providing to other telecommunications business operators
services through network interconnection that are inferior in quality to those
on the telecommunications business operator’s own network or to those it
provides to its subsidiaries or branches.
Article 74: If a telecommunications business operator violates
the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 34 or the second paragraph of
Article 40 hereof by refusing to provide to a telecommunications subscriber a
list of charges for domestic long-distance communications, international
communications, mobile communications and information services free of charge
or refuses to provide to a telecommunications subscriber free of charge with
the basis on which the local telephone charges are billed when such subscriber has
an objection to his local telephone charges and requests to be informed of such
basis, the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government shall
order it to rectify the matter and apologize to the telecommunications subscriber.
If the telecommunications business operator refuses to rectify the matter and
apologize to the telecommunications subscriber , the telecommunications
administration authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality
directly under the central government shall punish it with a warning and a fine
of not less than Rmb5,000 and not more than Rmb50,000.
Article 75: If a telecommunications business operator violates
the provisions of Article 41 hereof, the telecommunications administration
authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the
central government shall order it to rectify the matter, apologize to the
telecommunications subscribers and compensate such subscribers for their losses.
If the telecommunications business operator refuses to rectify the matter,
apologize to the telecommunications subscribers and compensate such subscribers
for their losses, the telecommunications administration authority of the
province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government
shall punish it with a warning and a fine of not less than Rmb10,000 and not
more than Rmb100,000. If the case is serious, it shall order the telecommunications
business operator to suspend operations and undergo rectification.
Article 76: If these Regulations are violated by the commission
of any of the acts set forth below, the telecommunications administration
authority of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the
central government shall order rectification of the matter and impose a fine of
not less than Rmb10,000 and not more than Rmb100,000:
(1) selling telecommunications terminal equipment for which
no network connection permit has been obtained;
(2) unlawfully preventing or hindering a telecommunications
business operator from
providing public telecommunications services to telecommunications
subscribers; or
(3) modifying or moving a third party’s telecommunications
circuits or other telecommunications facilities without authorization.
Article 77: If these Regulations are violated by lowering
the quality or performance of products after a telecommunications equipment
network connection permit has been obtained therefor, the product quality supervision
authority shall impose punishment in accordance with the relevant laws and
administrative regulations.
Article 78: If any of the prohibited acts specified in Article
57, Article 58 and Article 59 hereof is carried out and the case is serious,
the original authority that issued the perpetrator’s telecommunications
business permit shall revoke the same.
After the State Council’s department in charge of the information
industry or the telecommunications administration authority of the province,
autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government has
revoked a telecommunications business permit, it shall notify the enterprise’s registration
authority thereof.
Article 79: If an employee of the State Council’s department
in charge of the information industry or the telecommunications administration
authority of a province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the
central government is derelict in his duties, abuses his authority or practises
graft and such act constitutes a criminal offence, his criminal liability shall
be pursued; if such act is insufficient to constitute a criminal offence, he
shall be subjected to administrative sanctions.
CHAPTER SEVEN: SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS
Article 80: The State Council shall separately formulate
specific procedures governing the investment in and operation of
telecommunications business in the People’s Republic of China by foreign
organizations or individuals and investment in and operation of telecommunications
business on the mainland by organizations or individuals from the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region and the Taiwan
region.
Article 81: These Regulations shall be implemented as of
the date of promulgation.
ATTACHMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
1. Basic telecommunications services
(1) fixed network domestic long distance and local telephone
services;
(2) mobile network telephone and data services;
(3) satellite communications and
mobile satellite communications services;
(4) internet and other public data transmission services;
(5) lease and sale of broadband, wavelengths, optical fibres,
optical cables, cable ducts and other network elements;
(6) network carriage, access and outsourcing services;
(7) international communications infrastructure and international
telecommunications services;
(8) radio paging services;
(9) resale of basic telecommunications services.
The services in Items (8) and (9) shall be administered as
value-added telecommunications services.
2. Value-added telecommunications services
(1) email;
(2) voice mail;
(3) online information database storage and retrieval;
(4) electronic data interchange;
(5) online data processing and transaction processing;
(6) value-added facsimile;
(7) internet access services;
(8) internet information services;
(9) video teleconferencing services
APPENDIX C:
U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade
Business Development and Industrial Cooperation Working Group
Information Industry Subgroup
2003 Work Plan
Based on the Document Concerning the Purpose and Procedures of the Information Industry Subgroup, the principal goal is to promote commercial relations and bilateral trade between the U.S. and China in this sector. To expand bilateral trade and address commercial issues in information industry, the parties to the Subgroup agree to support the work program below.
Parties to the Subgroup agree to identify, develop, and support trade events, such as trade missions, reverse trade missions, exhibitions, conferences, seminars, and similar events, that foster trade and commercial ties between the United States and China. Through Subgroup meetings and communication between meetings, both parties agree to name their development prospects and possible trade opportunities in the information industry field. The parties will assist, in the role of both visitor and host, in identifying and recruiting governmental and business representatives to participate in these events. Each nation will also provide logistical support to visiting delegations to the extent feasible.
Parties to the Subgroup agree to strive to co-organize events in 2003, in either the United States or China, on key policy issues affecting the information industry sector or on emerging technologies of mutual interest.
Date EVENT
Early June 2003 Orientation visit to US standard & implementation bodies
Late June 2003 Semiconductor and software export licensing procedures seminar
October 2003 Telecommunications policy & law seminar
Parties to the Subgroup agree to support key trade events in the information industry
sector in the United States and China such as those listed below in calendar year 2003.
DATE EVENT
1. March 9-15, 2003 Microelectronics Trade Mission to Shanghai
(in conjunction with Electronics China/Semicon China)
2. March 17-19, 2003 Wireless 2003 (Cellular
Telecommunications Industry Association event)
New Orleans, Louisiana
3. April 5-10, 2003 National Association of Broadcasters
Las Vegas, Nevada
4. April 2003 Seventh China International E-commerce Summit
Beijing
5.
June 1-5, 2003 SuperComm
Atlanta, Georgia
6.
June 23-26, 2003 ELE/EXPO
COMM 2003
Shanghai
7.
Late June 2003 Chinese
international software exhibition
Beijing
8. September 16-18, 2003 PC EXPO
New York, New York
9. November 11-15, 2003 PT Wireless and Networks COMM
Beijing
10. November
16-21, 2003 Comdex
Las Vegas, Nevada
11. November
18-21, 2003 Original
Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)-focused
Reception
at EXPO COMM China South Guangzhou
12. December 8-11, 2003 Internet World Fall
New York, New York
13. December 2003 Information Industry Subgroup meeting
Signing
of the 2004 Subgroup Work Plan
Beijing.
Additions or adjustments to this Work Plan will be made at subsequent meetings of the Subgroup or between meetings of the Subgroup whenever appropriate and mutually agreed to by the Chinese and U.S. co-chairs of the Subgroup.
Any activities undertaken by the Subgroup, including annual meetings, will be subject to the availability of appropriated funds and subject to the laws and regulations of the United States and China.

APPENDIX D:
USEFUL CONTACTS
UNITED STATES
U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION
U.S.
Department of Commerce/International Trade Administration staff located
throughout the United States can answer many questions that U.S. IT,
telecommunications, and e-commerce firms have about doing business abroad.
Office of Information Technologies and Electronic
Commerce (OITEC)
Tu-Trang Phan (Information Technologies)
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Room 2802
Washington D.C. 20230
Phone: (202) 482-0480
Fax: (202) 482-0952
E-mail: tu-trang_phan@ita.doc.gov
Web address: http://www.export.gov/infotech
Jeff Rohlmeier (E-commerce)
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Room 2001A
Washington D.C. 20230
Phone: (202) 482-0343
Fax: (202) 482-5522
E-mail: jeff_rohlmeier@ita.doc.gov
Web address: http://www.export.gov/infotech
Office of Telecommunications Technologies (OTT)
John Henry
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Room 4327
Washington D.C. 20230
Phone: (202) 482-1193
Fax: (202) 482-5834
E-mail: john_henry@ita.doc.gov
Web address: http://www.export.gov/infotech
U.S.-BASED IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRADE ASSOCIATIONS
American Electronics Association (AEA)
William T. Archey
President
1225 Eye Street, NW
Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 682-9110
Fax: (202) 682-9111
Email: Bill_Archey@aeanet.org
Web address: http://www.aeanet.org
Business Software Alliance (BSA)
Robert Holleyman, II
President
1150 18th Street
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 872-5500
Fax: (202) 872-5501
Email: software@bsa.org
Web address: http://www.bsa.org
Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association
(CTIA)
Thomas Wheeler
President and CEO
1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 785-0081
Fax: (202) 785-0721 or (202) 467-6990
Contact: Robert Roche, Research Director;
Jeffrey Nelson, Communications Director
Web address: http://www.wow-com.com
Computer & Communications Industry Association
(CCIA)
Ed Black
President
666 11th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20001
Tel: (202) 783-0070
Fax: (202) 783-0534
Email: ccia@aol.com
Web address: http://www.ccianet.org
Harris Miller
President
1616 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1300
Arlington, VA 22209
Tel: (703) 522-5055
Fax: (703) 525-2279
Email: ccayo@itaa.org
Web address: http://www.itaa.org
Rhett B. Dawson
President
1250 Eye Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 737-8888
Fax: (202) 638-4922
Email: rdawson@itic.nw.dc.us
Web address: http://www.itic.org
Personal Communications Industry Association (PCIA)
Jay Kitchen
President
500 Montgomery Street, Suite 700
Alexandria, VA 22314-1561
Tel: (703) 739-0300
Fax: (703) 836-1608
Contact: Mark Golden
Web address: http://www.pcia.com
Satellite Industry Association (SIA)
Richard DalBello
Executive Director
225 Reinekers Lane, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
Tel: (703) 549-8697
Fax: (703) 549-9188
E-mail: info@sia.org
Web address: http://www.sia.org
Kenneth Wasch
President
1730 M. Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 452-1600
Fax: (202) 223-8756
Email: kwasch@spa.org
Web address: http://www.siia.net
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA)
Jason Leuck
Director, International Affairs
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 350
Washington, DC 20004
Tel: (202) 383-1493
Fax: (202) 383-1495
E-mail: jleuck@tia.eia.org
Web address: http://www.tiaonline.org
Robert Kapp
President
1818 N Street NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036
Tel:(202) 429-0340
Fax: (202) 775-2476
Web address: http://www.uschina.org
United States Council for International Business
(USCIB)
1212 Avenue of the
Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: (212) 354-4480
Policy Advocacy Fax: (212) 575-0327
Membership Fax: (212) 391-6568
General information:
info@uscib.org
Membership: membership@uscib.org
Web address: http://www.uscib.org
United States Telecom Association (USTA)
Walter B. McCormick, Jr.
President & CEO
1401 H Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005-2164
Tel: (202) 326-7300
Fax: (202) 326-7333
Contact: Kathleen Kelleher
Tel: (202) 326-7357
E-mail: kkellehe@usta.org
Web address: http://www.usta.org
Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation
(MOFTEC)
2 Dong Chang’an Avenue
Dongcheng District
Beijing 100731
Tel: 86-10-6519-8114
Fax: 86-10-6519-8039
Web address: http://www.moftec.gov.cn
Ministry of Information Industry (MII)
13 West Chang An Avenue
Beijing 100804, China
Tel: 8610 660177061
Fax: 8610 66011284
Web address: http://www.mii.gov.cn
Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
No. 15 Fuxing Road
Haidian District
Beijing 100038
Tel: 8610-6851-5544
Web address: http://www.most.gov.cn
State Administration of Radio, Film and Television
(SARFT)
No. 2 Fuxingmenwai Street
Xicheng District
Beijing 100866
Tel: 8610-6609-3114
Web address: http://www.sarft.gov.cn
State Council Informatization Office (SCITO)
P.O. Box: 1720
Beijing 100017
Tel: 8610 83087437
Fax: 8610 83085664
State Development Planning Commission (SDPC)
38 Yuetannanjie
Xicheng District
Beijing 100824
Tel: 86-10-6850-2114
Fax: 8610-6850-1090
Web address: http://www.sdpc.gov.cn
State Economic Trade Commission (SETC)
26 Xuanwumen Xidajie
Xuanwu District
Beijing 100053
Tel: 8610-6319-2298
Fax: 8610-6319-2177
Web address: http://www.setc.gov.cn
Web address: http://www.chinasmb.gov.cn
State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO)
6 Xituchenglu
Jimenqiao
Haidian District
Beijing 100088
Tel: 8610-8208-6768
Fax: 8610-6201-9307
Web address: http://www.sipo.gov.cn
No. 3, Nanlishi Road Toutiao
Beijing, China 100045
Tel: 8610 68050148
Fax: 8610 86821092
Contact: Zou Tong, Vice Director General
E-Mail: zout@bnii.gov.cn
7F, Sun Tong Infoport Plaza
55 Huaihai(w) Road
Shanghai, China 200030
Tel: 8621 62822266
Fax: 8621 62839339
Web address: http://www. http://www.infooffice.sta.net.cn/
No. 66, Gwiwangquiao Western Avenue
Chengdu, China 610017
Tel: 8628 86625211
Fax: 8628 958153391
Web address: http://www.scit.gov.cn
Science & Technology Department
Chenghua Street
Chengdu, Sichuan 610081
Tel: 8628 3334033-6510
Fax: 8628 3332164
Shaanxi Province Commercial Information Center,
Shaanxi Electronic Certificate Authority Center
No. 85, Xiwu Road, Xi’an, China 710004
Tel: 8629 5226199
Fax: 8629 5226299
Web address: http://www.shaanxi.gov.cn
U.S. Information Technology Office (USITO)
C511B Lufthansa Center Offices
50 Liangmaqiao Road
Chaoyang District
Beijing 100016
Tel: 8610-6465-1540
Fax: 8610-6465-1543
Contact: Dan Brody, Managing Director
E-mail: djbrody@usito.org
China Resources Building, #1903
8 Jianguomenbei Dajie
Beijing 100005
Tel: 8610-8519-1920
Fax: 8610-8519-1910
Web address: http://www.amcham-china.org.cn
Sichaun Branch, Chongqing Branch
No. 16, Section 3, Ren Min Zhong Road
Chengdu, Sichuan, China 610031
Tel: 8628 67732640
Fax: 8628 67732640
Building 2
No. 27 Wanshou Road
Beijing 100846
Tel: 8610 68208238/8247
Fax: 8610 68208238
Web address: http://www.ceca.net.cn
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service
31st Floor, North Tower
Beijing Kerry Center
1 Guang Hua Road
Beijing, China 100020
Tel: 8610 85296655
Fax: 8610 85296558
Web address: http://www.usatrade.gov
Contacts:
Sarah Kemp, Commercial Officer (telecommunications products and services)
E-mail: Sarah.Kemp@mail.doc.gov
Tel: 8610 85296655 ext. 813
Jianhong (Michael) Wang, Commercial Specialist (telecommunications products and services)
E-mail: Jianhong.Wang@mail.doc.gov
Tel: 8610 85296655 ext. 865
Cameron Werker, Commercial Officer (IT, Internet, e-commerce)
E-mail: Cameron.Werker@mail.doc.gov
Tel: 8610 85296655 ext. 818
Xianmin Xi, Commercial Specialist (IT, Internet, e-commerce)
E-mail: Xianmin.Xi@mail.doc.gov
Tel: 8610 85296655 ext. 829
Shujuan (Merry) Cao, Commercial Specialist (IT, Internet, e-commerce)
E-mail: Shujuan.Cao@mail.doc.gov
Tel: 8610 85296655 ext. 861
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service
Shanghai Center
Suite 631
1376 Nanjing West Road
Shanghai 200040
Tel: 8621 62797630
Fax: 8221 62797639
Web address: http://www.usatrade.gov
Contacts:
Jonathan Heimer, Commercial Officer
E-mail: Jonathan.Heimer@mail.doc.gov
Christie Ho, Commercial Representative
E-Mail: Christie.ho@mail.doc.gov
Ronnie Xu, Senior Commercial Specialist,
E-Mail: Ronnie.xu@mail.doc.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service
4 Lingshiguan Road
Chengdu, Sichuan 610041
Tel: 8628 85583992
Fax: 8628 85589221
Web address: http://www.usatrade.gov
Contacts:
Helen Peterson, Principal Commercial Officer
E-mail: Helen.Peterson@mail.doc.gov
Rose Nickel, Commercial Representative
E-Mail: rose.nickel@mail.doc.gov
Xu Tao, Commercial Assistant
E-Mail: xu.tao@mail.doc.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service
14/F China Hotel Office Tower
Room 1454-61 China Hotel
Liu Hua Lu
Guangzhou 510015
Tel: 8620 86674011
Fax: 8620 86666409
Contact: Kent Guo, Commercial Representative
E-Mail: Kent.Guo@mail.doc.gov
Web address: http://www.usatrade.gov
52 Shi Si Wei Road
Heping District
Shenyang 110003
Tel: 8624-23221198
Fax: 8624-2322-2206
Contact: Erin Sullivan, Commercial Officer
E-mail: Erin.Sullivan@mail.doc.gov
Web address: http://www.usatrade.gov
Participation in trade fairs is one of the most cost effective ways of testing a foreign market's receptivity to a product and investigating competitors, and of finding customers or potential agents and distributors. In China, participants use trade fairs to do business, not merely to advertise their products.
The events listed below are some of the major ones in China. They are international in scope, giving visitors, buyers, and exhibitors alike the foundation needed to start business relations. For a complete list of IT, telecommunications, and related trade fairs in China supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, see http://www.usatrade.gov. In addition, the Department’s Information Technology Industries’ web site (http://www.export.gov/infotech) lists IT- and telecommunications-related trade fairs.
U.S. Department of Commerce personnel participate in many of these trade fairs with or on behalf of U.S. firms, offering them market promotion and additional services such as trade lead generation. These trade promotion events facilitate participation at prices far below regular trade fair participation costs or offer additional services not elsewhere available. In addition, U.S. firms on the waiting list for exhibit space, or not interested in exhibiting but needing qualified assistance and meeting rooms at specific trade shows, should contact the Department’s commercial specialists in the particular country (see Contacts) to discuss options.
China Computerworld Expo
http://www.ccwexpo.com.cn/english/
Date: September 2003
Location: China International Exhibition Center, Beijing
Organizer: China Computerworld Publishing & Servicing Company
Infoex-world Services Ltd.,
Tel: 86-10-68259420
Fax: 86-10-68259768
E-mail: Zhangwy@public3.bta.net.cn
PT/Expo Communications
http://www.ejkrause.com/events/9202.html
Date: October 2003
Location: China International Exhibition Center, Beijing
Organizer: E.J. Krause & Associates
Tel: 86-10-8451-1832
Fax: 86-10-8451-1829
Email: ejk@public3.bta.net.cn
Event Type: International Conference
Date: April 2003
Location: International Convention Center, Beijing
Organizers: Ministry of Information Industry,
Tel: 8610-68200719
Fax: 8610-68200717
Comdex China
http://www.comdex.com.cn/english/index.htm
Date: To Be Determined
Location: China International Exhibition Center, Beijing
Tel: 86-10-84602153
Fax: 86-10-64671904
Shanghai International Industry Fair (SIF)
http://www.sif-expo.com/sif2002/eindex.htm
Date: October 2003
Location: Shanghai Exhibition Center
1000 Yanan Road, Shanghai
Tel: 86-21-6279-0279, 86-21-6256-0100
Fax: 86-21-6256-1068
Supercomm Asia
http://www.supercommasia.com/english/edefault.asp
Date: April 2003
Location: Shanghai
Times Publishing Group
Times Centre
1 New Industrial Road
Singapore 536196
Tel: (65)2848844(General); (65)3807436(Direct)
Fax: (65)2865754
E-mail: jshuang@tpl.com.sg
Web site: http://www.tpl.com.sg
China High-Tech Fair (Shenzhen)
http://www.chtf.com/english/
Date: October 2003
Location: Shenzhen International Exhibition Center
Organizer: IDG Expos and Shenzhen Municipal Government
Tel: 86-755-369-9381; 86-755-209-9209
Fax: 86-755-367-1044
APPENDIX F:
LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS
Contributing Information for this Report
GOVERNMENT
Beijing Informatization Office
Ministry of Information
Industry
Ministry of Foreign Trade
and Economic Cooperation China International Electronic Commerce Center,
Sichuan Branch
Shaanxi Province
Informatization Office
Shaanxi Province Economic
and Trade Commission
Shanghai Informatization
Office
Shanghai Economic
Commission
Shanghai Communications
Administration
State Council Informatization Office
State Economic and Trade Commission
AsiaInfo
Bonsen Tech
Channel Beyond
China National Cereals,
Oils & Foodstuffs Import and Export Corporation (COFCO)
China Telecom Guangdong
China Unicom
Cosco Lines Co. Ltd.
Digital China, Legend
E&T International (EDI Center)
ecSolutions Corp. Ltd.
Great Wall Telecom
Guangzhou Huanghuagang Information Park
Huawei Technologies
Pacific Century International
Pudong Software Park
Shaanxi Province Commercial Information Center
Shaanxi Electronic Certificate Authority Center
Shanghai Bell Alcatel
Super Data Software
TOP Group
UT Starcom
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Xian National High Technology Industrial Development Zone
[1] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml. According to CNNIC, “’business’ websites refers to those fictitious network-like websites, e.g., such ‘.com’ companies as sina and sohu. ‘Enterprise’ websites are opposite to the business websites-- those founded by enterprises whose operation is mainly off- line.”
[2] At the National People’s Congress (NPC) meeting in March 2003, SDPC was renamed the State Development and Reform Commission and given the responsibility for the nation’s economic restructuring.
[3] At the March 2003 NPC meeting, SETC and MOFTEC were merged into a new Ministry of Commerce.
[4] The following 21 IT and telecom products require CCC mark approval to be imported into and sold in China: Personal computers, Portable personal computers, Display units connected with computer, Printers connected with computer, Multiplying printer & coping machines, Scanners, Switching power supply units for computer and adapters, Chargers, Computer game players, Learning machine, Duplicators, Servers, Finance and trade settlement equipment, Fixed telephone terminal, Cordless telephone terminal, Key-phone system, Facsimile machine, Modem, Mobile terminal, ISDN terminal, Data Terminal, and Multimedia terminal.
[5] “Informatization” is defined as the promotion of the use of information technologies by governments, businesses, and citizens, as well as the support of the information technology industry’s growth and development.
[6] Ogutcu, Mehmet, Getting China’s regions moving, OECD Observer, June 26, 2002.
[7] The Ministry of Electronics Industry merged with the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications in 1998 to form the Ministry of Information Industry. This list of Golden Projects reflects the responsible ministries in 1993.
[8] The Ministry of Internal Trade is now part of the State Economic Trade Commission.
[9] The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation replaced the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade in March 1993.
[10] Prior to China’s accession to the WTO, China required two marks to import and sell IT and telecom equipment in the China market. These marks were administered by two separate agencies. Since China’s accession, the two marks have been merged into a new China Compulsory Certification (CCC) mark, required on all products - domestic and imports - on a 132-product category list. A new body called the Certification and Accreditation Administration of China (CNCA), administratively under the State General Administration for Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ), administers the CCC mark. However, redundant testing requirements still remain between CNCA and the Ministry of Information Industry for certain telecom products. Telecom terminal equipment currently requires three marks to be sold in the China market: (1) one for frequency verification, (2) one for network access, and (3) one for quality, safety, and electromagnetic compatibility (CCC mark).
[11] APEC was established in 1989 to promote trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. APEC currently consists of 21 member economies, including Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States of America, and Vietnam.
[12] Exchange rate of approximately 1 U.S. dollar = 8.1938 RMB
[13] Electronic and information products include computers, telecommunications terminal equipment, monitors, television sets, electronic components, and integrated circuits.
[14] The Standard, December 4, 2002, p. 12.
[15] Digital Planet 2002, World Information Technology and Services Alliance, February 2002.
[16] The twelve IT products requiring the CCC mark include personal computers and portable personal computers, display units connected to computers, printers connected to computers, multiplying printer and copying machines, scanners, switching power supply units for computer and adapters, chargers, computer game players, learning machines, duplicators, servers, finance, and trade settlement equipment.
[17] According to the Object Management Group (OMG), CORBA is OMG's open, vendor-independent architecture and infrastructure that computer applications use to work together over networks. Using the standard protocol IIOP, a CORBA-based program from any vendor, on almost any computer, operating system, programming language, and network, can interoperate with a CORBA-based program from the same or another vendor, on almost any other computer, operating system, programming language, and network.
[18] Note: companies are eligible for the value-added tax (VAT) rebate only under certain conditions. The normal VAT is 17 percent for software and integrated circuit (IC) design and manufacturing companies. The refund reduces the effective VAT rate for certified software companies from 17 percent to 3 percent. Domestic manufacturers of ICs are eligible for a refund of VAT paid above 6 percent, if their investment in China exceeds RMB 8 billion and they produce chips with line widths below 0.25 microns.
[19] The 35 software colleges are: Peking University, Tsinghua University, Beijing Polytechnic University, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronauts, Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications, Beijing Technology Institute, Nankai University, Tianjin University, Northeastern University, Dalian University of Technology, Jilin University, Harbin Institute of Technology, Fudan University, Tongji University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Eastern China Normal University, Nanjing University, Southeast University, Zhejiang University, University of Science and Technology of China, Shandong University, Wuhan University, University of Science and Technology of Central China, University of National Defense, Hunan University, Zhongshan University, South China University of Technology, Chongqing University, Sichuan University, University of Science and Technology of China, Yunnan University, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Northwestern Polytechnic University, Xidian University, and Hangzhou Electronics Industry College.
[20] At the National People’s Congress (NPC) meeting in March 2003, SDPC was renamed the State Development and Reform Commission and given the responsibility for the nation’s economic restructuring.
[21] The 11 software bases administered by MII and SDPC are: Beijing Zhonghuancun Base, Shanghai Pudong Software Park, Dalian Software Base, Chengdu Software Base, Xi’an Software Base, Jinan Software Base, Hangzhou Software Base, Guangzhou Software Base, Changsha Software Base, Nanjing Software Base, and Zhuhai Software Base.
[22] Brizendine, Thomas, Software Integration in China, The China Business Review, March-April 2002, p.28.
[23] China is not a signatory to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), which requires signatories to select contractors based on performance standards. Upon accession to the WTO in December 2001, China did agree to consider joining the GPA two to three years after accession and after reviewing its current government procurement laws to ensure that they are consistent with GPA provisions.
[24] These 14 cities include Chengdu, Chongqing, Dalian, Fuzhou, Hangzhou, Nanning, Ningbo, Qingdao, Shenyang, Shenzhen, Xiamen, Xi’an, Taiyuan, and Wuhan.
[25] China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), Semiannual Survey Report on the Development of China’s Internet (July 2001, July 2002 and January 2003), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/develst/repindex-e.shtml.
[26] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml. According to CNNIC, “’business’ websites refers to those fictitious network-like websites, e.g. such ‘.com’ companies as sina and sohu. ‘Enterprise’ websites are opposite to the business websites-- those founded by enterprises whose operation is mainly off- line”. Id.
[27] CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the Development of China’s Internet (January 2003), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/develst/2002-7e/index.shtml.
[28] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml.
[29] United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), E-commerce and
Development Report 2002, pg. 14, http://www.unctad.org. Data based on UNCTAD and private sector
research calculations. Figures include
data for Hong Kong, as well as the People’s Republic of China.
[30] United States & Foreign Commercial Service (US&FCS China), Internet Services Industry Sector Analysis (October 18, 2001).
[31] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml.
[32] Elaine X. Grant, Study: E-Commerce to Top $1 Trillion in 2002, E-Commerce Times, online edition; http://www.ecommercetimes.com, February 13, 2002.
[33] UNCTAD, E-commerce and Development Report 2002, pg. 13, http://www.unctad.org, citing data from eMarketer.
[34] Digital China informational brochure and interview with company officials (Beijing, June 2002).
[35] Interview with COFCO company officials (Beijing, June 2002).
[36] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml
[37] B2C Gaining Popularity in Urban China, China Daily (online edition), May 30, 2001, http://www1.chinadaily.com.cn.
[38] CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the Development of China’s Internet (July 2002 and January 2003). http://www.cnnic.net.cn/develst/repindex-e.shtml
[39] CNNIC, Semiannual Survey Report on the Development of China’s Internet (January 2003), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/develst/2002-7e/index.shtml.
Note: The CNNIC’s survey does not explain exactly why Chinese consumers are increasingly indicating that e-commerce is an “efficient” option. This sentiment may be based on the real or perceived benefits of e-commerce, namely that, in comparison to off-line commerce, it allows for more efficient mechanisms of choice, payment and delivery.
[40] UNCTAD, E-commerce and Development Report 2001, pg. 236, http://www.unctad.org
[41] US&FCS China, Commercial Banking Industry Sector Analysis (September 6, 2001).
[42] Id.
[43] Interview with Bank of Communications officials (Shanghai, June 2002).
[44] Online Trading Growth in China, HK-iMail, April 9, 2002, as published on http://www.nua.com/surveys/
[45] Online Trading Booms in China, South China Morning Post, January 29, 2002, as posted on http://www.nua.com/surveys/
[46] China’s Entry Into the WTO: What It Means for U.S. Industry, Export America magazine (online edition), January 2002, http://www.trade.gov/exportamerica/FullArchive/Jan02.pdf
[47] Online Education Picking Up In China, Chronicle of Higher Education, May 22, 2001, as posted on http://www.nua.com/surveys/
[48] UNCTAD, E-commerce and Development Report 2001, pg. 240, http://www.unctad.org
[49] Interview with staff of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Xian, Shaanxi Province, June 2002).
[50] Id.
[51] In 2003, Guangdong province, one of China’s most important regional economies, became the first province to enact its own e-commerce law. The law grants legal recognition for electronic signatures and regulates e-commerce certification agencies and Internet service providers.
[52] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml
[53] Interview with Shanghai Informatization Office officials (Shanghai, June 2002).
[54] China Admits to Digital Divide, China Daily, May 20, 2002, as posted on http://www.nua.com/surveys/
[55] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml
[56] CNNIC, Survey Report on the Quantity of China’s Internet Information (July 2002), http://www.cnnic.net.cn/e-sl.shtml
[57] Interview with officials at MII (Beijing, June 2002).
[58] Interview with officials at Shaanxi Economic & Trade Commission (Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, June 2002).
[59] Interview with SCITO officials (Beijing, June 2002).
[60] China’s First Draft Civil Code Gives Priority to Protection, China Daily, as posted on Beijing China Daily (Internet Version) in English, December 24, 2002.
[61] Id.
[62] Jonah Greenberg, Web Content Rules in China Threaten New Penalties, Reuters (online edition), July 15, 2002, http://www.reuters.com
[63] Official Says China Will Tax E-Commerce, Associated Press, July 24, 2000, as posted on the New York Times website, http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/07/biztech/articles/24china-tax.html
[64] The May 1998 WTO Declaration on Electronic Commerce established a moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions and a work program to address e-commerce issues in the WTO.
[65] More information on the APEC ECSG’s data privacy activities can be located at http://www.export.gov/apececommerce/privacy.html.
[66] China Country Commercial Guide FY2002, Chapter 1: Executive Summary, U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service, Beijing, China.
[67] Information about the International Partner Search program can be found in Chapter 6
[68] Industry Sector Analysis: IT Product Distribution; Kent Guo, U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service, Guangzhou, China, September 14, 2002.
[69] U.S. Department of Commerce, China Country Commercial Guide 2002.
[70] This is an unofficial translation of the China’s telecommunications regulations provided by the U.S. Information Technology Office (USITO).