Environmental Technologies Industries
|
Market Research |
Partnering In China's Environmental Sector |
Vehicle | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Local Production | Can Accept payment in RMB Can compete better on cost Closer to end-user; faster delivery time, other benefits Many options for manufacturing | Requires investment Could require higher operating costs Potential dangers in Tech. Transfer |
JV | Partner may provide some benefits May be easier to get investment approval | Possible theft of technology Must run business with partner More difficult exit strategy |
WOFE* | No partner- a free hand in the market | No assistance from partner |
Direct Imports | Easier to Protect Technology Lower costs all around | Cannot accept payment in RMB May face import restrictions Products will likely cost more |
Rep Office | Cost-effective way to enter market Can understand market better before setting up production | (relative to other direct import options) Operating costs for China presence |
Agents/Dist | Very useful for broad footprint of end-users Can provide service | Dangers in losing control of marketing Not applicable for all products |
Franchise | No need to be in China | Risk of technology theft, very difficult to monitor/control, little recourse in disputes |
Direct Sales (no dist, rep.) | No need to be in China | Operationally difficult, applicable to products with small end-user footprint |
Example: Air treatment for a state-owned company Market: Few opportunities for foreign companies. | Example: Wastewater system for a foreign factory Market: Market not large, but there are opportunities |
Example: Water Treatment plant; special project Market: Some opportunities for equipment, few for service | Example: ADB funded project such as Suzhou Creek Market: Foreign companies (both service and equip) desired, but margins can be small |
Vehicle | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Local Production | Can Accept payment in RMB Can (maybe) compete better on cost Closer to end-user; faster delivery time, other such benefits Many options for manufacturing | Requires investment Could require higher operating costs Potential dangers in Tech. Transfer |
JV | Partner may provide some benefits May be easier to get investment approval | Possible theft of technology Must run business with partner More difficult exit strategy |
WOFE* | No partner- a free hand in the market | No assistance from partner |
Direct Imports | Easier to Protect Technology Lower costs all around Less risk, exit strategy easier | Cannot accept payment in RMB May face import restrictions Products will likely cost more |
Rep Office | Cost-effective way to enter market Can understand market better before setting up production | (relative to other direct import options) Operating costs for China presence |
Agents/Dist | Very useful for broad footprint of end-users Can provide service | Dangers in losing control of marketing Not applicable for all products |
Franchise | No need to be in China | Risk of technology theft, very difficult to monitor/control, little recourse in disputes |
Direct Sales (no dist, rep.) | No need to be in China | Operationally difficult, applicable to products with small end-user footprint |
Company | Vehicle | Scope |
ERM | JV | Focus on environmental auditing, assessments, training and more, for private and public projects. |
PACT | WOFE | Specialists in industrial water and wastewater |
Degremo nt | JV | Water Treatment Engineering and Equipment |
CDM | HK office | Full service environmental engineering, with focus on foreign-funded projects |
Sinosphere | Rep | Environmental consulting and advocacy |
CH2M Hill | Rep | Full service environmental engineering, with focus on foreign-funded projects |
Thames PlC | JV | Built and operates water treatment plant in Baoshan, Shanghai, with other operations. |
Montgomery Watson | Rep | General engineering and construction, including industrial facilities, power plants and the like |
Black & Veatch | ||
Fluor Daniel |
Company | Vehicle | Product |
ITT Flygt, Goulds | JV | Various Pumps |
US Filter | Rep | All kinds of environmental equipment and project management |
Fisher Rosemount | JV(s) | Analytical equipment |
Fluke Corporation | Rep | Environmental Controls |
BHA | WOFE | APC, with emphasis on indoor air |
Donaldson | Rep | Indoor APC |
ABB | FE | APC and various solutions |
Shanghai Kawamoto | JV | Pumps, Blowers |
WL Gore | WOFE | APC Filters |
Flottweg GmbH | Rep | Centrifuges, Belt Presses, other WW equipment |
General Signal | WOFE | Mixers (Lightnin brand) |
Baker Hughes/EIMCO | WOFE | Water and wastewater equipment |
AquaGuard Spill Response | Agents | Oil Spill Equipment |
Dow Filmtec | Many* | Reverse Osmosis membranes |
Nikuni Pumps | JV | Pumps |
Monsanto | WOFE | Filtration Equipment |
BOC | FE | Water and wastewater (eg, aeration) equipment and solutions |
Alfa-Laval | JV | Sludge centrifuges |
ALB Klein | Rep | Various imported equipment |
LMI (Milton Roy) | Rep | Chemical Feed Pumps |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 2.5 | N/a | 2.6 | 4% | 3.0 | 13% |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 1.2 | N/a | 1.2 | 0 | 1.5 | 20 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 20.5 | N/a | 9.6 | (113) | 9.7 | 1 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a | N/a | N/a | N/a | N/a |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 0.6 | N/a | 0.5 | (20) | 0.7 | 28 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a | 1.8 | N/a | 2.2 | 18 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a | 0.22 | N/a | 0.27 | 18 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million)) | 11 | N/a | 12 | 8 | 12 | 0 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 1.6 | 10 | 1.8 | 11 | 1.9 | 5 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 4 | N/a | 4 | 20 | 4.2 | 5 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a | N/a | 80-90 | N/a | 80-90 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 1.2 | 5 | 1.2 | 0 | 1.3 | 8 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 7-8 | N/a | 7-8 | N/a | 7-8 | N/a |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 4.6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5.3 | 5.5 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 3.4 | 10 | 3.8 | 11. | 4 | 5 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 4 | N/a | 4.5 | 11 | 4.5 | 0 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a. | N/a | N/a | N/a | N/a |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 4.5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 16 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/A | N/a | 5.5 | N/a | 5.8 | 4 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 0.6 | 10 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.8 | 25 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | 3 | 6. | 3.2 | 6 | 3.4 | 6 |
97 | (%) | 98 | (%) | 99 | (%) | |
Sales Volume ($ million) | N/a | N/a | 1.4 | 5 | 1.6 | 12.5. |